IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-number-registries-02.txt> (Internet Numbers Registries) to Informational RFC

Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Mon, 16 December 2013 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14E51A1F56 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:10:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9eJtCna-o_0L for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:10:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B031A1F4A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:10:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11224DA557; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:09:58 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RpcRHGz63v4T; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:09:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from golem.sobco.com (golem.sobco.com [136.248.127.162]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AE294DA54A; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:09:57 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-number-registries-02.txt> (Internet Numbers Registries) to Informational RFC
From: Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131216175534.1390.8446.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:09:56 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F0D5C88C-3391-4539-AB36-C45FECC71A10@sobco.com>
References: <20131216175534.1390.8446.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: draft-housley-number-registries@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:10:03 -0000

I’m not sure it is helpful to have the special use IPv4 address in more than one RFC

i.e., why not just point to RFC 6890 rather than reproduce it?

and if there is a reason to make a new one then this doc should unambiguously obsolete RFC 6890

Scott

On Dec 16, 2013, at 12:55 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:

> 
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'Internet Numbers Registries'
>  <draft-housley-number-registries-02.txt> as Informational RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-01-22. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>   RFC 7020 provides information about the Internet Numbers Registry
>   System and how it is used in the distribution of autonomous system
>   (AS) numbers and globally unique unicast Internet Protocol (IP)
>   address space.
> 
>   This companion document identifies the IANA registries that are part
>   of the Internet Numbers Registry System at this time.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-housley-number-registries/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-housley-number-registries/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email