IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• RE: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTP State Management to BCP, Dave Kristol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTP State Management to BCP, Jacob Palme
    • Re: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTP State Management to BCP, Keith Moore
      • Re: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTP State Management to BCP, Jacob Palme
      • Re: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTP State Management to BCP, Keith Moore
      • RE: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTPState Management to BCP, Bernard Aboba
• More on wireless networks, Graham Klyne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • More on wireless networks, Graham Klyne
• [no subject], =?x-user-defined?b?wO67qg==?=
• Warning for draft-baldwin-bsafe-test-00.txt, bmanning
  • Re: Warning for draft-baldwin-bsafe-test-00.txt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Re: Warning for draft-baldwin-bsafe-test-00.txt, bmanning
• stupid question, Constantine Protopapas
• ATM standard speeds, Constantine Protopapas
• draft-kalt-irc-*, Christophe Kalt
• Broadband Access Conference (BAC'99), Preliminary Program, Andrzej Pach
• isadsoc at fokus.gmd.de, issll at mercury.lcs.mit.edu, itc at fokus.gmd.de, itc at ieee.org, kia at usl.edu, lanoms99 at lrg.ufsc.br, members at hpovua.org, members at tmforum.org, mobile-ip at tadpole.com, modern-heuristics at uk.ac.mailbase.ucdavis.edu, multicomm at cc.bellcore.com, multicomm at research.panasonic.com, Andrzej Pach
• [no subject], Vishal Dutta MCP
• Gigabit router architecture, Constantine Protopapas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Gigabit router architecture, Irwin Lazar
  • RE: Gigabit router architecture, Reza Arefi
  • Gigabit router architecture, Wang Qihua
    • Re: Gigabit router architecture, Lloyd Wood
• How do I unsubscribe from this list?, Loretta W. Prencipe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How do I unsubscribe from this list?, Robert G. Ferrell
• [no subject], zhu gu
• [no subject], srinivasarao_sakhamuri
• [no subject], Firman Gunawan
• RE: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTP State Management to BCP, Yaron Goland (Exchange)
  • Re: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTP State Management to BCP, Dave Kristol
• Naive RFC-creation questions, Erik Stewart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Naive RFC-creation questions, Tony Hain
• Help formatting RFCs, Sean Turner
• Re: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTP State Managementto BCP, John Stracke
  • Re: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTP State Managementto BCP, Fred Baker
    • Re: Last Call: Applicability Statement for HTTP State Managementto BCP, Valdis . Kletnieks
• call for BCP: draft-simpson-des-as-01.txt, William Allen Simpson
• Diff-serv PHB identifiers, Scott W Brim
• [no subject], Loretta W. Prencipe
• auth 7411672a subscribe ietf Manoj at AcceleratedNetworks.soft.net, Manoj
• [Fwd: RFC Search Index], Rodent of Unusual Size
• [no subject], Lance James
• RE: Anyone interested in selling a 2.4Gh PCMCIA?, Gaylord K. Miyata
• [no subject], Djohan
• [no subject], Kevin Tucker
• Email Failure, mark.paton
  • Re: Email Failure, Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: Email Failure, Lloyd Wood
      • Re: Email Failure, Peter Dawson
      • Re: Email Failure, Lloyd Wood
      • Re: Email Failure, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Email Failure, Lloyd Wood
• Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Randy Bush
  • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Matt Crawford
    • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Randy Bush
  • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, John C Klensin
    • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Marcus Leech
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, John C Klensin
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Marcus Leech
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Robert Moskowitz
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Stephen Casner
      • Message not available
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Matt Crawford
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Takashi TSUTSUI
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Dave Mitton
  • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, tytso
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Graham Klyne
    • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Amlan Saha
      • RE: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Arnoud Zwemmer
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Bill Sommerfeld
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Henning Schulzrinne
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Takashi TSUTSUI
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Theodore Y. Ts'o
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Jim Thompson
      • Re: 45th IETF: Wireless LAN, Takashi TSUTSUI
• Comments on STD-1: RFC-2500, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
• Printing RFCs & IDs from MS Explorer, Falk, Aaron
  • Re: Printing RFCs & IDs from MS Explorer, Erik Huizer
• RFC Search Index, Leonardo Freitas
  • Re: RFC Search Index, Fred Baker
  • RE: RFC Search Index, Constantine Protopapas
    • DES reclassifed as Historic?, Pete Loshin
      • Re: DES reclassifed as Historic?, Fred Baker
      • Re: DES reclassifed as Historic?, Perry E. Metzger
      • Re: DES reclassifed as Historic?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: RFC Search Index, Simon Leinen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RFC Search Index, Irwin Lazar
  • RE: RFC Search Index, Dan Kohn
  • Re: RFC Search Index, Henning Schulzrinne
• The IETF list has become quieter, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The IETF list has become quieter, Robert G. Ferrell
• Implementors of RFC 1740 -- MacMIME, Patrik Fältström
• 2 IP address, Sahasranamam Subramanian
• NFS Failover solution, Sahasranamam Subramanian
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: NFS Failover solution, Jeff Schreiber
  • RE: NFS Failover solution, Jeff Schreiber
• Test, Please ignore, Stanley Weilnau
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Test, Please ignore, IETF archive user
  • Test, Please ignore, Stanley Weilnau
  • Test, please ignore, IETF archive user
  • Test, please ignore, Glen
  • test, please ignore, Glen Zorn
  • Test, please ignore, Glen Barney
• IEEE Network Magazine Special Issue on Multicasting, Sanjoy Paul
  • CFP for ISMIP-99 (fwd), fanliu
• Please remove my email address from the distribution list, S Wedgeworth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Please remove my email address from the distribution list, O . E . OKUMO
• Wireless ATM, Leonardo Freitas
  • RE: Wireless ATM, Constantine Protopapas
• Ralph Nader takes ICANN to task, Peter Dawson
  • Re: Ralph Nader takes ICANN to task, Robert Shaw
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ralph Nader takes ICANN to task, Graham Klyne
    • Re: Ralph Nader takes ICANN to task, Shane Kerr
      • Re: Ralph Nader takes ICANN to task, Robert Moskowitz
      • Anyone interested in selling a 2.4Gh PCMCIA?, Robert Moskowitz
      • RE: Anyone interested in selling a 2.4Gh PCMCIA?, Bernard Aboba
    • Re: Ralph Nader takes ICANN to task, John Stracke
      • Re: Ralph Nader takes ICANN to task, Keith Moore
  • Re: Ralph Nader takes ICANN to task, TIM LEE
    • Re: Ralph Nader takes ICANN to task, Perry E. Metzger
• NDSS 2000 SUBMISSION DEADLINE EXTENDED TO JUNE 23RD, David M. Balenson
• RFC 1314 to historic status -- input needed, Patrik Fältström
• Amateurish question, srinivasarao_sakhamuri
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Amateurish question, srinivasarao_sakhamuri
• 48,000 jobs + free resume posting, skibo1999
• Dumb question, tom
  • Re: Dumb question, Peter Dawson
  • Re: Dumb question, Michel Gilbert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Dumb question, Tom Winters
• Nothing to do with email, Robert G. Ferrell
  • Re: Nothing to do with email, Graham Rae Dulmage
  • Re: Nothing to do with email, Peter Dawson
• remove name, Craig Young
• CompactPCI Query, JIM MEDEIROS
• MIBs for VPN, Lawson, Rich
• [no subject], High Performance Distributed Computing
• MPLS RFC, Constantine Protopapas
  • Re: MPLS RFC, Andrew G. Malis
• Q: Need RFC Number, Jeff Canning
  • Re: Q: Need RFC Number, Claus Färber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Q: Need RFC Number, Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: Q: Need RFC Number, dnewman
  • Re: Q: Need RFC Number, Steven M. Bellovin
• [no subject], mark.paton
  • Again it all degrades to ad hominem attacks, Uber, Chet
• Apologies, scot
• Cringely on Cisco's Certified Network Engineers, Lloyd Wood
  • Re: Cringely on Cisco's Certified Network Engineers, Vijay Gill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cringely on Cisco's Certified Network Engineers, Fred Baker
    • Re: Cringely on Cisco's Certified Network Engineers, M. Obbad
    • Re: Cringely on Cisco's Certified Network Engineers, Uber, Chet
      • Re: Cringely on Cisco's Certified Network Engineers, Lloyd Wood
      • RE: Cringely on Cisco's Certified Network Engineers, mark.paton
• Question RFC 2460 IPv6 Next Header values, h.a.aalderink
  • Re: Question RFC 2460 IPv6 Next Header values, Matt Crawford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Question RFC 2460 IPv6 Next Header values, h.a.aalderink
• Interesting article about ICANN in NY Times, Ron Lautmann
  • Re: Interesting article about ICANN in NY Times, Kent Crispin
    • Re: Interesting article about ICANN in NY Times, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Interesting article about ICANN in NY Times, Peter Dawson
• Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Keith Moore
  • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Dick St.Peters
    • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Brad Knowles
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Lloyd Wood
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Keith Moore
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Keith Moore
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Matt Curtin
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Brad Knowles
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Dave Sill
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Lloyd Wood
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Martin Hamilton
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Perry E. Metzger
      • Re: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Perry E. Metzger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Asinine anti-spam mechanisms, Larry Osterman (Exchange)
• Protest mail, Constantine Protopapas
  • Re: Protest mail, E.I. Kolehmainen
• Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Common Sense, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Common Sense, Jeff Williams
    • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Common Sense, Michael H. Warfield
  • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Common Sense, Fred Baker
    • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Common Sense, Jeff Williams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Common Sense, Jim Fleming
• Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Jeff Williams
  • RE: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Constantine Protopapas
    • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Jeff Williams
    • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Peter Dawson
      • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Alex Kamantauskas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Einar Stefferud
    • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Milton Mueller
      • RE: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • RE: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Juan del Villar
    • RE: Damned petty squabbling, Simon Butcher
  • RE: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, scot
  • FW: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, scot
    • Re: FW: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Fred Baker
  • Re: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Jim Fleming
    • RE: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • RE: FW: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, scot
    • RE: FW: What direction is the IETF heading ? That of Censorship, Lloyd Wood
• auth 5950c870 subscribe ietf skilaru at cisco.com, Srikanth Kilaru
• RE: Fwd: IETF is *NOT* the internet community (fwd), scot
• IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Bob Allisat
  • Re: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Rodent of Unusual Size
  • Re: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Michael H. Warfield
    • RE: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Jim Harlow
      • Re: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Valdis . Kletnieks
    • How to make profit on IP-based services.....!!, Nils-Åke Nordström
  • RE: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Constantine Protopapas
    • RE: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Fred Baker
      • RE: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Constantine Protopapas
    • RE: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, mark.paton
      • Re: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Ace Meataku Anvil
      • RE : Mobile Phone SMS RFCs, Ace Meataku Anvil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Robert G. Ferrell
  • RE: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, scot
    • PLEASE don't trim the CC: lines, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: PLEASE don't trim the CC: lines, Markus Peuhkuri
      • Re: PLEASE don't trim the CC: lines, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, 鄭志文 (Chih-Wen Cheng)
    • RE: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Ted Wolf Jr
    • Re: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, John W. Noerenberg
      • Re: IETF is *NOT* the internet community, Fred Baker
• Internet and Efficiency, Micoft
• K12 at INET, Greg FitzPatrick
• Senator Alstons Itinery (fwd), Bob Allisat
• FILE /internet-drafts/draft-rajan-policy-framework-00.txt, shreyasgandhi
• FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mobileip-mn-nai-01.txt, shreyasgandhi
• Re: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing, Scott Bradner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing, Noriko Hata
    • Re: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing, Keith McCloghrie
• Re: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing Differentiated Services, Noriko Hata
  • Re: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing Differentiated Services, Dave Crocker
    • Re: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing Differentiated Services, Jon Crowcroft
• The answer to those who say that ASCII is inadequately expressive..., Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The answer to those who say that ASCII is inadequately expressive..., Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
• REMINDER: CFP: ISOC Year 2000 Netw. & Distr. Sys. Security Symp. (NDSS 2000), David M. Balenson
• RE : The Internet is for Everyone, Ace Meataku Anvil
• Network design software, Constantine Protopapas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Network design software, Constantine Protopapas
• purpose of SMTP gateways, sbeltz
  • Re: purpose of SMTP gateways, Keith Moore
    • Re: purpose of SMTP gateways, John W. Noerenberg
• Re: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing Differentiated Services, Noriko Hata
• draft-finseth-btv-00.txt, Patrik Fältström
• Broadband Access Conference - EXTENDED DEADLINE - MAY 31 !, Andrzej Pach
• IETF Attendance Statistics, Fred Baker
• 回复: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing Differentiated Services, Xiaoming Fu
• RE: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing Differe ntiated Services, Yoram Bernet
  • Re: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing Differentiated Services, Kathleen Nichols
    • Re: BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing Differentiated Services, Jon Crowcroft
• BOF proposal announcement: Complexity of Implementing Differentiated Services, Jon Crowcroft
• Worldperks bonus bulletin - Radisson Oslo, Robert Moskowitz
• [no subject], LANOMS'99
• Re: Last Call: A Proposal for an MOU-Based ICANN Protocol Support Organization, Dave Crocker
• Web Architecture for a data for a data sensitive application, achuthaks
• question??, Guangsheng Liu
  • Re: question??, Ari Ollikainen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: question??, Vernon Schryver
    • Re: question??, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: question??, Guangsheng Liu
    • Re: question??, Fred Baker
      • Re: question??, Bill Manning
  • Re: question??, Vernon Schryver
  • FW: question??, Constantine Protopapas
  • Re: FW: question??, Vernon Schryver
• Comments: draft-arnold-scmp-02.txt, Graham Klyne
• delivery notification, Mail_Delivery_Agent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • delivery notification, Mail_Delivery_Agent
• Comment on draft-arnold-scmp-02.txt, John Stracke
  • Re: Comment on draft-arnold-scmp-02.txt, Jason Eaton
    • Re: Comment on draft-arnold-scmp-02.txt, John Stracke
• Re: In IETF We Trust --- FW: internet engineering task force - internet society task force ?, scot
• In IETF We Trust, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
  • Re: In IETF We Trust, Valdis . Kletnieks
  • Re: In IETF We Trust, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: In IETF We Trust, Ace Meataku
    • Re: In IETF We Trust, Fred Baker
  • Re: In IETF We Trust, Scott Bradner
  • Re: In IETF We Trust, Robert G. Ferrell
  • Re: In IETF We Trust, Juan del Villar
• [no subject], LANOMS'99
• Suggestion for an RFC., Peter Seebach
  • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., Fred Baker
    • Message not available
      • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., Fred Baker
    • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., Lloyd Wood
      • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., seebs
      • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., Peter Dawson
      • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., Keith Moore
      • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., Fred Baker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., Vernon Schryver
  • Re: Suggestion for an RFC., Robert G. Ferrell
• Download NEW Internet Radio Tuner, Maria Cantwell
• Comment on RFC1812 Update, Tony Dal Santo
  • Re: Comment on RFC1812 Update, Peter Dawson
• Guidelines for internet-draft documents, Fred Baker
  • Re: Guidelines for internet-draft documents, Lloyd Wood
    • Re: Guidelines for internet-draft documents, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
    • Re RFC 2500, John Border
• [no subject], Murali
• IM99 early registration extended to May 6th, IM99 conference
• Tutorials by Sanjoy Paul at ICMCS99, Enrico Vicario
• Re: Register fee set, DoC/NSI agree, Jeff Williams
• Re: Confirmation for subscribe ietf, Michael Hunter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Confirmation for subscribe ietf, Majordomo
  • Re: Confirmation for subscribe ietf, Robert G. Ferrell
  • Confirmation for subscribe ietf, Majordomo
  • Confirmation for subscribe ietf, Majordomo
  • Confirmation for subscribe ietf, Majordomo
  • Confirmation for subscribe ietf, Majordomo
• IETF Oslo hotel, Ole J. Jacobsen
  • Re: IETF Oslo hotel, Ken Hornstein
    • RE: IETF Oslo hotel, Fruitbat
      • Re: IETF Oslo hotel, Ken Hornstein
      • RE: IETF Oslo hotel, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Re: IETF Oslo hotel, Matt Crawford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IETF Oslo hotel, Graham Klyne
• RE: AF-ALL: RE: AF-ALL:, jp carroll
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: AF-ALL: RE: AF-ALL:, Peck, Greggory
  • Re: AF-ALL: RE: AF-ALL:, Raghu Dev
  • RE: AF-ALL: RE: AF-ALL:, Reni Ninan
• [no subject], Matt Henne
• Your April Issue is now online, newsdesk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Your April Issue is now online, Peck, Greggory
    • RE: Your April Issue is now online, James D. Wilson
• Anonymous Internet access?, Gunnar Lindberg
• Multi-services network, Constantine Protopapas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Multi-services network, Kevin Tucker
    • Re: Multi-services network, Peter Dawson
  • RE: Multi-services network, Reni Ninan
    • RE: Multi-services network, Constantine Protopapas
  • RE: Multi-services network, Avijeet Mukherjee
    • Re: Multi-services network, Peter Dawson
    • RE: Multi-services network, Eric S. Crawley
  • RE: Multi-services network, Reni Ninan
    • RE: Multi-services network, Satpute. Madhavi
      • Re: Multi-services network, Peter Dawson
      • RE: Multi-services network, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • RE: Multi-services network, Irwin Lazar
    • RE: Multi-services network, Constantine Protopapas
  • RE: Multi-services network, scot
  • RE: Multi-services network, Reni Ninan
• [no subject], Prof. Carlos B. Westphall
  • Re: AF-ALL:, BRYAN_INGRAM
• my posting (multi services network), Constantine Protopapas
• RE: Broadband Access Conference (BAC'99), Paul Christ
• IMAP, vipher
  • Re: IMAP, Peter Dawson
• Roaming Ethernet at IETF meetings, Rodent of Unusual Size
• Multi services network, Constantine Protopapas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Multi services network, Constantine Protopapas
• spam targeting domain owners, Svante Nygren
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: spam targeting domain owners, The Bullington's
• REMINDER: IM99 early registration ends April 23rd, IM99 conference
• old I-D on rdbms wire protocol?, Jeff . Hodges
• auth 5816702b subscribe ietf alessandro.mordacci at etx.ericsson.se, Alessandro Mordacci (ETX)
  • [no subject], sahkhar
• RFC-2555: 30 Years of RFCs., Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
  • Re: RFC-2555: 30 Years of RFCs., James Glave
• re: IPv6, Victor Nittolo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • IPv6, Don McMorris
    • Re: IPv6, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: IPv6, Pekka Savola
    • RE: IPv6, Tony Hain
    • Re: IPv6, itojun
  • Re: IPv6, Robert G. Ferrell
    • Re: IPv6, Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: IPv6, Nicolai Schlenzig (DXD)
  • IPv6, Thor Harald Johansen
    • Re: IPv6, Petr Baudis
  • Re: IPv6, Thor Harald Johansen
  • IPv6, Thor Harald Johansen
  • RE: IPv6, Christian Huitema
  • IPV6, piyush dwivedi
    • Re: IPV6, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Fw: IPV6, piyush dwivedi
• NOMS 2000 Call for Papers, JUDY A KELLER
• Fwd: "PARIS84215", Casey Farrell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fwd: "PARIS84215", Casey Farrell
• Benchmark Print Supply, Alex de Joode
  • RE: Benchmark Print Supply, James D. Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Benchmark Print Supply, Brandt, Mark S
• On the URI/DNS last calls, Robert Elz
  • Re: On the URI/DNS last calls, Keith Moore
• Request for rfc, swar
• Re: Last Call: The Text/Plain Format Parameter to Proposed Standard, Claus André Färber
  • Re: Last Call: The Text/Plain Format Parameter to Proposed Standard, Ned Freed
    • Re: Last Call: The Text/Plain Format Parameter to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz
      • Re: Last Call: The Text/Plain Format Parameter to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Last Call: The Text/Plain Format Parameter to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick
• Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Vernon Schryver
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Vernon Schryver
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Keith Moore
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Vernon Schryver
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Keith Moore
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Keith Moore
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Vernon Schryver
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., David Borman
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Vernon Schryver
• copier & laser printer supplies advertisement, remailer
  • Re: copier & laser printer supplies advertisement, Sahasranamam Subramanian
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • copier & laser printer supplies advertisement, bb123
• Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Valdis . Kletnieks
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Perry E. Metzger
    • RE: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Larry Masinter
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Jeffrey I. Schiller
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Pete Resnick
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Ned Freed
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Jeffrey I. Schiller
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Pete Resnick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Vernon Schryver
    • RE: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Larry Masinter
    • RE: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Richard Shockey
  • RE: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Vernon Schryver
    • RE: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Dan Wing
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Keith Moore
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., William Allen Simpson
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Perry E. Metzger
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Vernon Schryver
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Pete Resnick
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Theodore Y. Ts'o
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Vernon Schryver
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Pete Resnick
  • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Vernon Schryver
    • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Keith Moore
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Dick St.Peters
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Jeffrey I. Schiller
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Dick St.Peters
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Rusty Zickefoose
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Jeffrey I. Schiller
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Glen Zorn
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Keith Moore
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Jeffrey I. Schiller
      • RE: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Rusty Zickefoose
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Jeffrey I. Schiller
      • Re: Argh. the spam.. make it stop..., Randall Gellens
• Toner Supplies, remailer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • toner supplies, toner18
• Philo, California is named for the inventor of the Internet!, Casey Farrell
• Philo, California named for "inventor" of Internet!, Casey Farrell
• NOMS 2000 Call for Participation,, Gayle Weisman
• ietf at howard-online.com: Career opportunities for IETF Members, Kannan Varadhan
  • Re: ietf at howard-online.com: Career opportunities for IETF Members, Peter Dawson
    • Re: ietf at howard-online.com: Career opportunities for IETF Members, Daniel Senie
  • Re: ietf at howard-online.com: Career opportunities for IETF Members, Syed Farrukh Rasheed Abidi
• SPAM using the IETF's name, Fred Baker
  • Re: SPAM using the IETF's name, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: SPAM using the IETF's name, Steve Coya
    • Re: SPAM using the IETF's name, Paul Hoffman / IMC
• IETF Connectivity and Terminal Room, Daniel Senie
  • Re: IETF Connectivity and Terminal Room, Jessie Stickgold-Sarah
    • Re: IETF Connectivity and Terminal Room, Daniel Senie
    • Re: IETF Connectivity and Terminal Room, Kauto Huopio
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IETF Connectivity and Terminal Room, Kevin C. Almeroth
• [no subject], Paul Bowker
• "potluck" terminal room, William Allen Simpson
  • Re: "potluck" terminal room, John Martin
    • Re: "potluck" terminal room, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "potluck" terminal room, Graham Klyne
  • Re: "potluck" terminal room, Graham Klyne
    • Re: "potluck" terminal room, Randy Bush
      • Re: "potluck" terminal room, Kent Crispin
      • Re: "potluck" terminal room, Dave Crocker
      • Re: "potluck" terminal room, Randy Bush
      • Re: "potluck" terminal room, Dave Crocker
      • Re: "potluck" terminal room, Randy Bush
      • Re: "potluck" terminal room, Matt Crawford
  • Re: "potluck" terminal room, William Allen Simpson
• [no subject], Mrityunjay Hubli
• Minneapolis terminal room, Keith Moore
  • Terminal rooms and their future, Dennis Fazio
  • Re: Minneapolis terminal room, Geert Jan de Groot
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Minneapolis terminal room, Tim Salo
  • Re: Minneapolis terminal room, adfalk
• [no subject], Nhena Nyagura
• [no subject], 安田弘和
• [no subject], Andy Symons
• (Kein Betreff), Philippe
• FYI: <http://www.iana.org/postel/> is up again!, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
• Minneapolis terminal room post-mortem, Matt Holdrege
  • Re: Minneapolis terminal room post-mortem, Tripp Lilley
  • Re: Minneapolis terminal room post-mortem, Matt Crawford
  • Re: Minneapolis terminal room post-mortem, Andrew Partan