IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small PDAs), (continued)
  • Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small PDAs), Vernon Schryver
    • Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small PDAs), Marshall T. Rose
      • rfc publication suggestions, Dave Crocker
      • Re: rfc publication suggestions, Russ Allbery
• Test message (please delete), Cheng Jack-QA3581
• EDIINT WG ??, Dawson, Peter D
  • Re: EDIINT WG ??, ned . freed
• Software engineer, Kian Haghdad
• anti-plane rant (was RE: draft-anderson-forces-req-00.txt), tom worster
• Re: Why XML is perferable: manipulating and presentation, Wang Xianzhu
  • Re: Why XML is perferable: manipulating and presentation, Carl Malamud
• HTML vs. TXT: let's compare!, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
• RE: HTML better for small PDAs, graham . travers
  • Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Lloyd Wood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Christian Huitema
  • Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Robert G. Ferrell
    • HTML same problem with TXT. XML/SGML the solution, Wang Xianzhu
      • Re: HTML same problem with TXT. XML/SGML the solution, Bill Manning
  • Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks
  • RE: HTML better for small PDAs, graham . travers
  • RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Christian Huitema
  • RE: HTML better for small PDAs, graham . travers
    • Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Michael Richardson
    • Re: HTML better for small PDAs, John Stracke