IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Dave Crocker
  • RE: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Eric Gray
    • Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Lakshminath Dondeti
      • RE: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Eric Gray
  • Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Theodore Tso
  • Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", SM
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Dave Crocker
      • RE: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Eric Gray
      • RE: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Ole Jacobsen
      • Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Eric Rosen
      • Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Ole Jacobsen
      • Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Marshall Rose
      • Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Andrew G. Malis
    • Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality", Theodore Tso
• Re: Last Call: draft-wu-sava-testbed-experience (SAVA Testbed and Experiences to Date) to Experimental RFC, Jari Arkko
  • Re: Last Call: draft-wu-sava-testbed-experience (SAVA Testbed and Experiences to Date) to Experimental RFC, Pekka Savola
    • Re: Last Call: draft-wu-sava-testbed-experience (SAVA Testbed and Experiences to Date) to Experimental RFC, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Last Call: draft-wu-sava-testbed-experience (SAVA Testbed and Experiences to Date) to Experimental RFC, Pekka Savola
      • Re: Last Call: draft-wu-sava-testbed-experience (SAVA Testbed and Experiences to Date) to Experimental RFC, Jari Arkko
• [no subject], Unknown
• RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Glen Zorn
  • RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Avi Lior
  • RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Narayanan, Vidya
    • Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Charles Clancy
      • RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Bernard Aboba
      • RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Narayanan, Vidya
      • RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
      • Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Charles Clancy
      • RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Bernard Aboba
  • Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Brian E Carpenter
    • RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue, Glen Zorn
• Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt, Charles Lindsey
  • Re: Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt, Charles Lindsey
      • Re: Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt, Brian E Carpenter
• Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-mraihi-inch-thraud-05, Ben Campbell
  • Followup on draft-mraihi-inch-thraud-06.txt (was re: Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-mraihi-inch-thraud-05), Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
  • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov
    • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
  • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
    • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
    • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Ned Freed
      • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Cyrus Daboo
    • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
  • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Ned Freed
    • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch
      • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Ned Freed
    • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
• draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt, Joel M. Halpern
  • Re: draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt, Lakshminath Dondeti
    • Re: draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt, Lakshminath Dondeti
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000-beam-09.txt, Black_David
• On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Lakshminath Dondeti
  • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Danny McPherson
  • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Melinda Shore
    • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Ole Jacobsen
    • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Lakshminath Dondeti
    • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Michael StJohns
      • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Dave Crocker
      • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Dave Crocker
      • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Dave Crocker
      • Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context, Alexey Melnikov
• Thoughts on the nomcom process, Lakshminath Dondeti
  • Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process, Spencer Dawkins
    • Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process, Jari Arkko
  • Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process, Michael StJohns
    • Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process, Ole Jacobsen
      • Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process, Michael StJohns
      • Confirming vs. second-guessing, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Michael StJohns
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Ralph Droms
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Michael StJohns
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Michael StJohns
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Ralph Droms
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Stewart Bryant
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Danny McPherson
      • Nomcom liaison duties, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Nomcom liaison duties, Danny McPherson
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, SM
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Fred Baker
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Dave Crocker
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Dan Wing
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Christian Huitema
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Dan Wing
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Lixia Zhang
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Fred Baker
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Lixia Zhang
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Theodore Tso
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Theodore Tso
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Ole Jacobsen
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Danny McPherson
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Lixia Zhang
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Theodore Tso
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Dave Crocker
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Dan Wing
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Dan Wing
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Russ Housley
      • RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Michael StJohns
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Message not available
      • Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing, Dave Crocker
      • Message not available
      • Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process, Michael StJohns
    • Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process, Stephen Kent
• IPv6 experiment: recording lessons, deficiencies and action items, Dave Crocker
• experiments in the ietf week, Jari Arkko
  • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Fred Baker
    • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Julian Reschke
  • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Richard Barnes
  • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
    • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Mark Andrews
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Marc Manthey
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Joe Abley
      • Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week, Jari Arkko
      • RE: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week, Russ Housley
      • Message not available
      • RE: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week, Patrik Fältström
      • Usability RE: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week, Andrew G. Malis
      • RE: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Mark Andrews
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Mark Andrews
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Jari Arkko
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: experiments in the ietf week, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week), Jari Arkko
      • Re: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week), Dan Wing
      • Re: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week), Eric Rescorla
      • Re: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week), Eric Rescorla
      • Re: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week), Eric Rescorla
      • Re: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week), Ned Freed
      • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Eric Rescorla
  • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Hannes Tschofenig
    • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Jari Arkko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Russ Housley
    • Re: experiments in the ietf week, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Bernard Aboba
  • Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Fred Baker
  • Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Jari Arkko
    • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Avi Lior
      • EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet), Jari Arkko
      • RE: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet), Avi Lior
      • Re: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet), Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet), Theodore Tso
      • Re: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet), Jari Arkko
      • Re: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet), Dan Harkins
      • Re: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet), Bernard Aboba
      • RE: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet), Avi Lior
      • Message not available
      • RE: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet), Dan Harkins
      • RE: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet), Avi Lior
  • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Avi Lior
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Bernard Aboba
    • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Pasi.Eronen
      • Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Narayanan, Vidya
      • Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Narayanan, Vidya
      • Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Yoshihiro Ohba
      • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Pasi.Eronen
      • Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Yoshihiro Ohba
      • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Avi Lior
      • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Avi Lior
      • Message not available
      • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Dan Harkins
      • EMSK key hierarchy and the DSRK, Dan Harkins
      • Re: EMSK key hierarchy and the DSRK, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: EMSK key hierarchy and the DSRK, Dan Harkins
      • Re: [HOKEY] EMSK key hierarchy and the DSRK, Yoshihiro Ohba
      • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Avi Lior
      • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Pasi.Eronen
      • RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Avi Lior
  • Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Results from the Federated Roaming BBoF, stefan . winter
• Sun Glasses Found in Salon I, Alexandru Petrescu
• IPv6 router when switching wifi networks, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: IPv6 router when switching wifi networks, Rémi Denis-Courmont
• Any further explanation of the Jabber server problems this week?, Dan York
  • Re: Any further explanation of the Jabber server problems this week?, Alexa Morris
    • Re: Any further explanation of the Jabber server problems this week?, Dan York
• Re: Last Call: draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry (A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes) to BCP, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Last Call: draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry (A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes) to BCP, Alexey Melnikov
• Jabber accounts for the IPv4 outage, Russ Housley
• IPv6 only experiment already yielding results, Joao Damas
  • Re: IPv6 only experiment already yielding results, David Conrad
• Updated KMART BoF Slides have been Upload, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Fwd: [71attendees] IPv6 Jabber Identity server anyone?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Fwd: [71attendees] IPv6 Jabber Identity server anyone?, Mark Andrews
• BBoF on Federated Roaming: Update, stefan . winter
• RFC 4693 Experiment Conclusion, The IESG
• Social Event - Transportation / Final Logistics Update, Livingood, Jason
  • Looking for a social ticket, Ahmad Muhanna
• IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News, Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News, Ofer Inbar
    • Re: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News, Carl Malamud
    • Re: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News, Marshall Eubanks
    • Re: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News, Daniel Brown
    • Re: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News, Carsten Bormann
• RE: Win Ice Hockey Tickets, Livingood, Jason
• GEOPRIV Experiment at IETF 71, Richard Barnes
• Re: Request for advancement, draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry-04, Frank Ellermann
• Jabber Update, Alexa Morris
• Problem with Jabber Server, Alexa Morris
• spamarrest.com and mailing list subscriptions, Adam Roach
  • Re: spamarrest.com and mailing list subscriptions, Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: spamarrest.com and mailing list subscriptions, SM
• Jabber server down? Contact for Jabber server onsite at IETF71?, Dan York
  • Re: Jabber server down? Contact for Jabber server onsite at IETF71?, Dan York
  • Re: Jabber server down? Contact for Jabber server onsite at IETF71?, Marc Manthey
• Attention to people trying to participate remotely: DST in progress, Julian Reschke
• Accommodation in Dublin, Adrian Farrel
  • Re: Accommodation in Dublin, Kurt Zeilenga
• Problem with Jabber?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Problem with Jabber?, Andrew G. Malis
• Audio Streaming has begun - IETF 71 Philadelphia, PA, USA 9-14 March 2008, Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Greg Shepherd
• sip call hold, d.giordano
  • Re: sip call hold, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Call for participation for possible IRTF Network Virtualization Research Group, Martin Stiemerling
• Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Dan York
  • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Joel Jaeggli
    • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Marshall Eubanks
      • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Theodore Tso
      • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Marshall Eubanks
      • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Patrik Fältström
      • Multicast and charging (Was: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Multicast and charging (Was: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?), Greg Shepherd
      • RE: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Dan York
      • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Patrik Fältström
      • Design for Deployment (yes you IPv6 wg!) RE: Was it foreseen .., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Design for Deployment (yes you IPv6 wg!) RE: Was it foreseen .., Peter Sherbin
      • RE: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Tony Hain
  • Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?, Fred Baker
• Win Ice Hockey Club Box Tickets in Philly, Ray Pelletier
• IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs, John C Klensin
  • Re: IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Re: IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs, John C Klensin
  • Re: IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs, Lisa Dusseault
• Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-05, Elwyn Davies
  • RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-05, Ghyslain Pelletier
• Gen-art review of draft-ietf-smime-multisig-04.txt, Elwyn Davies
  • RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-smime-multisig-04.txt, Turner, Sean P.
• A prayer for intercession, Ted Hardie
• AutoCAD file transfer over WAN, symonds thompson
  • Re: AutoCAD file transfer over WAN, Peter Dambier
  • RE: AutoCAD file transfer over WAN, Zheng Hewen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • AutoCAD file transfer over WAN, symonds thompson
• secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-04.txt, Stephen Hanna
  • Message not available
    • RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-04.txt, Larry Zhu
• IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie
  • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Russ Housley
  • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Cullen Jennings
    • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Sam Hartman
    • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Sam Hartman
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Sam Hartman
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Cullen Jennings
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Russ Housley
      • Message not available
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Russ Housley
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Thomas Narten
      • RE: IONs & discuss criteria, Eric Gray
      • a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers, Andrew Newton
      • Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers, Michael Thomas
      • Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, John C Klensin
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Scott Brim
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Dave Crocker
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Michael Thomas
      • Message not available
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Russ Housley
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie
      • Message not available
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Russ Housley
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Jari Arkko
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Russ Housley
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Tim Polk
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Cullen Jennings
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Sam Hartman
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Cullen Jennings
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Andrew Newton
  • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Russ Housley
    • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Sam Hartman
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Sam Hartman
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Dave Crocker
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ralph Droms
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Andrew Newton
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Dave Crocker
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Tim Polk
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Sam Hartman
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, John C Klensin
    • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Pete Resnick
      • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, John C Klensin
    • Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Dave Crocker
• Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report, Lakshminath Dondeti
  • Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report, Ralph Droms
    • Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report, Lakshminath Dondeti
    • Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report, Cary FitzGerald
  • Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report, Lakshminath Dondeti
      • Sharing information from questionnaires (Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report), Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Sharing information from questionnaires (Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report), Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Sharing information from questionnaires (Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report), Danny McPherson
      • Re: Sharing information from questionnaires (Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report), Danny McPherson
• RE: 71st IETF - Hotels and Social Event, Livingood, Jason
• secdir review of draft-ietf-imapext-sort-19, Tobias Gondrom
• LMI, satinder bedi
• Reducing Unwanted Communication Using SIP (RUCUS) BOF, Hannes Tschofenig
• Consensus so far on IDN(A), Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 AlgorithmswithCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard, Denis Pinkas
  • RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 AlgorithmswithCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard, Turner, Sean P.
  • Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 AlgorithmswithCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 AlgorithmswithCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard, Eric Rescorla
• Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Mark Andrews
    • Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Patrik Fältström
      • RE: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Patrik Fältström
      • RE: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • RE: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Mark Andrews
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Patrik Fältström
    • Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: LAST CALL on: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • RE: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Olaf Kolkman
      • Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05, Olaf Kolkman
• Re: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), Ted Hardie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), LB
  • Re: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), Ted Hardie
• IESG Statement on Registration Requests for URIs Containing Telephone Numbers, IESG Secretary
• Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), Patrik Fältström
  • Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), Jari Arkko
    • Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), Cullen Jennings
      • Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn), Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard, Mark Crispin
• draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Tony Finch
  • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Julian Reschke
    • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Ned Freed
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Tim Bray
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Julian Reschke
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Ned Freed
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Julian Reschke
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Ned Freed
  • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Julian Reschke
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Tom.Petch
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Julian Reschke
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Tom.Petch
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Julian Reschke
      • Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt, Frank Ellermann
• Discussion about Federated Roaming, Stefan Winter
• Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt, Elwyn Davies
  • RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt, Sri Gundavelli
    • Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt, Elwyn Davies
      • RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt, Sri Gundavelli
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-pending-additions-04.txt, Black_David
• FW: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4346-bis (The TransportLayer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2) to Proposed Standard, Mark Brown
• Audio Streaming - IETF 71 Philadelphia, PA, USA 9-14 March 2008, Joel Jaeggli
• IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Ralph Droms
  • Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Lucy Lynch
  • Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Leslie Daigle
    • wiki for IETF71 IPv6 experience Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Leslie Daigle
      • Re: wiki for IETF71 IPv6 experience Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: wiki for IETF71 IPv6 experience Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Leslie Daigle
      • Re: wiki for IETF71 IPv6 experience Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Cyrus Daboo
      • Re: wiki for IETF71 IPv6 experience Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Mark Andrews
  • Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-03.txt, Spencer Dawkins
  • RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-03.txt, Turner, Sean P.
    • Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-03.txt, Spencer Dawkins
  • Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-09.txt, Spencer Dawkins
• RE: 71st IETF - Early Bird Registration Cutoff, Livingood, Jason
• IETF 71 Social Ticket Update - Unpaid Tickets and Waitlist, Livingood, Jason
• Re: WG Review: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock (tictoc), Pekka Savola
• Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Douglas Otis
    • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Mark Andrews
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John Leslie
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ned Freed
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ned Freed
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Bill Manning
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Bill Manning
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ned Freed
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Willie Gillespie
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ned Freed
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Mark Andrews
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ned Freed
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ned Freed
      • IPv6 incentive? RE: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ned Freed
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John Levine
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John Levine
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Eliot Lear
      • RE: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Tony Hain
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Willie Gillespie
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Jim Fenton
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, David Conrad
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Pekka Savola
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Pekka Savola
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ned Freed