IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), (continued)
  • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), stephen botzko
  • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), stephen botzko
  • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Russ Housley
  • Re: [IAB] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Gregory M. Lebovitz
  • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Stephan Wenger
  • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Jean-Marc Valin
  • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Herve Taddei
  • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Roni Even
  • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Monty Montgomery
  • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), stephane.proust
    • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Ron
    • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Jean-Marc Valin
  • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Michael Knappe
  • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Ron
    • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), John Kostogiannis
  • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Sjoerd Simons
    • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Roni Even
• Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-rationale-15, Ben Campbell
• IETF 82 in Taipei, Ray Pelletier
• Fwd: Need volunteer for continued support of xml2rfc, Russ Housley
  • Re: Fwd: Need volunteer for continued support of xml2rfc, Julian Reschke
    • Re: Fwd: Need volunteer for continued support of xml2rfc, Robert Moskowitz
• Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John Levine
  • Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Jorge Amodio
    • Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John R. Levine
    • Message not available
      • Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains, SM
• Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Olafur Gudmundsson
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
      • Minutiae, was Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ..., Shane Kerr
      • Re: Minutiae, was Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ..., John C Klensin
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, John R. Levine
      • draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ..., Shane Kerr
      • Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ..., Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ..., Bill McQuillan
      • Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ..., Olafur Gudmundsson
      • Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa vs foo.invalid, John Levine
• Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, John Levine
  • Message not available
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, John R. Levine
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, John R. Levine
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, John R. Levine
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, John R. Levine
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Olafur Gudmundsson
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, John R. Levine
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, John R. Levine
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Phil Pennock
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, SM
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, SM
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard, Olaf Kolkman
• Spam Filter Y2.1K Bug, Glen
  • Re: Spam Filter Y2.1K Bug, Glen
• Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0), Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0), Julian Reschke
    • Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0), Sam Hartman
      • Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0), Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0), ned+ietf
    • Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0), Marshall Eubanks
      • Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0), Julian Reschke
• Re: I-D Action:draft-levine-reserved-names-registry-00.txt, Bill McQuillan
• Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John Levine
  • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John C Klensin
  • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Arnt Gulbrandsen
    • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Arnt Gulbrandsen
    • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Olafur Gudmundsson
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John Levine
    • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, J.D. Falk
  • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Jorge Amodio
    • RE: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, De Zeurkous
  • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Reed Loden
    • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John Levine
  • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Joe Abley
    • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Jorge Amodio
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Jorge Amodio
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John Levine
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, David Conrad
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Jorge Amodio
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John R. Levine
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Jorge Amodio
  • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Alan Barrett
    • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John Levine
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Joe Abley
      • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John R. Levine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, Alfred Hönes
    • Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains, John R. Levine
• Unexpected confirmation messages from the IETF, Glen
  • Re: Unexpected confirmation messages from the IETF, Andrew G. Malis
• What is this with these confirmation messages?, Christian Huitema
  • Re: What is this with these confirmation messages?, Michael Richardson
• Re: [New-work] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Andrew G. Malis
• Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Robert Elz
  • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
  • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Robert Elz
    • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Roni Even
    • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Roni Even
    • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Robert Elz
      • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Roni Even
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Koen Vos
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Patrik Fältström
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Mans Nilsson
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Brian West
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Jean-Marc Valin
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Brian West
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Brian West
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Richard Shockey
      • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Gregory Maxwell
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Brian West
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Benjamin M. Schwartz
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Brian West
      • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Gregory Maxwell
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Dean Willis
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Richard Shockey
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Joel Jaeggli
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Mans Nilsson
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Sam Hartman
      • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Richard Shockey
      • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Roni Even
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Sam Hartman
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Joel Jaeggli
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Andrew G. Malis
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Benjamin M. Schwartz
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Adrian Farrel
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Russ Housley
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Andrew G. Malis
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Stephan Wenger
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Jean-Marc Valin
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Stephan Wenger
      • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Michael Ramalho (mramalho)
      • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
      • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Roni Even
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Russ Housley
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Adrian Farrel
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Jean-Marc Valin
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Sam Hartman
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), John C Klensin
      • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Herve Taddei
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Joel Jaeggli
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Patrik Fältström
      • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Ingemar Johansson S
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Mans Nilsson
      • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Ingemar Johansson S
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Mans Nilsson
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), stephen botzko
      • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Ingemar Johansson S
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), stephen botzko
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Adrian Farrel
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Richard L. Barnes
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Adrian Farrel
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), stephen botzko
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Jean-Marc Valin
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), stephen botzko
      • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), stephane.proust
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Ron
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), stephen botzko
      • Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Monty Montgomery
      • RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Ingemar Johansson S
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Bernard Aboba
    • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Stephen Casner
      • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Jean-Marc Valin
  • Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec), Bernard Aboba
• need advice on reproducing code (Relax NG) from RFC 4287 (The Atom Syndication Format), Jorge Contreras
• Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, SM
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, John C Klensin
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Olafur Gudmundsson
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Olafur Gudmundsson
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, John C Klensin
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Ted Hardie
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, John C Klensin
      • Re: separate out SINK and registry, was Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa, John Levine
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Joe Abley
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Joe Abley
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, SM
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Joe Abley
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Joe Abley
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Tony Finch
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Tony Finch
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, SM
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Tony Finch
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Joe Abley
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, SM
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Bill Manning
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Alan Barrett
• Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Ted Hardie
  • Message not available
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Olafur Gudmundsson
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Ted Hardie
      • Message not available
      • Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP, Olafur Gudmundsson
• need advice on reproducing code (Relax NG) from RFC 4287 (The Atom Syndication Format), Julian Reschke
• Most bogus news story of the week, Ole Jacobsen
  • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Marshall Eubanks
    • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Richard L. Barnes
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Sam Hartman
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Patrik Fältström
      • RE: Most bogus news story of the week, Christian Huitema
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Marshall Eubanks
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, John C Klensin
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Richard L. Barnes
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Robert Moskowitz
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Cullen Jennings
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Scott Brim
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Robert Moskowitz
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Steven Bellovin
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Danny McPherson
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Ole Jacobsen
    • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Florian Weimer
    • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Scott Brim
      • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Bob Hinden
  • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Steven Bellovin
    • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, John Levine
  • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
    • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Sam Hartman
  • Re: Most bogus news story of the week, Bill Manning
• reminder about BOF proposals, Jari Arkko
• Re: your posting to IETF main list wrt References, Alfred Hönes
• Responses to IETF LC comments on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements-03), Martin Vigoureux
• draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps, Pasi.Eronen
  • Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps, Martin Rex
    • Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps, Martin Rex
  • Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps, Michael D'Errico
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps, Eric Rescorla
    • Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps, Marsh Ray
      • Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps, Martin Rex
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment and Operations) to Informational RFC, Pekka Savola
  • Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment and Operations) to Informational RFC, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment and Operations) to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear
• IETF 81 in Quebec City!, Ray Pelletier
• Creating issues for "Related Active Documents", Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: Creating issues for "Related Active Documents", Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: [Fecframe] Last Call: draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec (DVB-IPTV Application-Layer Hybrid FEC Protection) to Informational RFC, Colin Perkins
  • RE: [Fecframe] Last Call: draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec (DVB-IPTVApplication-Layer Hybrid FEC Protection) to Informational RFC, Ali C. Begen (abegen)
    • Re: [Fecframe] Last Call: draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec (DVB-IPTVApplication-Layer Hybrid FEC Protection) to Informational RFC, Colin Perkins
• draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-08.txt, Donald Eastlake
• draft-ietf-smime-cms-rsa-kem-10 LC comments, Alfred Hönes
  • Re: draft-ietf-smime-cms-rsa-kem-10 LC comments, Sean Turner
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security(TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch
• XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke
  • Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard, Anthony Bryan
    • Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke
      • Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard, Anthony Bryan
      • RE: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard, Thomson, Martin
      • Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke
      • RE: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard, Thomson, Martin
      • Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard, Peter Pöml
• ISOC BoT nominations, Ted Hardie
• ISOC and W3C Announcement, IETF Chair
  • Re: ISOC and W3C Announcement, Russ Housley
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-krb-wg-preauth-framework (A Generalized Framework for Kerberos Pre-Authentication) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard, Polk, William T.
  • Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard, SM
• Re: Last Call: draft-xli-behave-ivi (The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition) to Experimental RFC, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Last Call: draft-xli-behave-ivi (The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition) to Experimental RFC, Jari Arkko
• Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, IETF Member Dave Aronson
    • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Joe Abley
  • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Russ Housley
    • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Wes Hardaker
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Julian Reschke
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Julian Reschke
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Wes Hardaker
    • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Doug Ewell
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, IETF Member Dave Aronson
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Richard L. Barnes
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Julian Reschke
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, IETF Member Dave Aronson
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Loa Andersson
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Steven Bellovin
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, IETF Member Dave Aronson
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Dave Cridland
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Stewart Bryant
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Dave Cridland
      • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    • Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails, Robert Moskowitz
• but ipv6 wasn't dead, Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead, AJ Jaghori
  • Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead, David Morris
    • Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead, Arnt Gulbrandsen
• IUCG IDNA2010 SIG, jean-michel bernier de portzamparc
  • Re: IUCG IDNA2010 SIG, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • IUCG IDNA2010 SIG, jean-michel bernier de portzamparc
• Re: Another thoughts on TRANSITIONAL, JFC Morfin
• RE: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC, Eran Hammer-Lahav
  • Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC, Anthony Bryan
    • RE: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC, Eran Hammer-Lahav
      • Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC, Anthony Bryan
    • Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC, Scott Lawrence
      • Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC, Anthony Bryan
• recent change to draft-reschke-rfc2731bis (in IESG), Alfred Hönes
  • Re: recent change to draft-reschke-rfc2731bis (in IESG), Julian Reschke
• sctp multihoming query, Sudhanva Mudigere Narayana Gowda
  • Re: sctp multihoming query, Michael Tüxen
  • Re: sctp multihoming query, Lars Eggert
• Question about Binary Encapsulation (Context: Packet Headers), Peter Schwartz
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Chris Newman
  • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Yoav Nir
    • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Chris Newman
  • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer, Martin Rex
    • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer, Chris Newman
      • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer, Martin Rex
      • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer, Nelson B Bolyard
    • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer, Marsh Ray
      • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer, Martin Rex
  • Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer, Martin Rex
• '3GPP QoS Model for Networks Using 3GPP QoS Classes, Karthik Balaguru
• Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Yoav Nir
  • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell
    • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer, Martin Rex
      • NOT RECOMMENDED (was: Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation), Peter Saint-Andre
      • RE: NOT RECOMMENDED (was: Re: [TLS] Last Call:draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation), Dan Wing
      • Re: NOT RECOMMENDED, Bob Braden
      • Re: NOT RECOMMENDED, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Cullen Jennings
  • RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
• Spotted at an IEEE conference, Richard Barnes
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-hip-native-api-09, Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-attr-cert-mime-type (Theapplication/pkix-attr-cert Content Type for AttributeCertificates) to Informational RFC, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Bodo Moeller
  • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Marsh Ray
  • RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Nasko Oskov
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, David-Sarah Hopwood
    • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Santesson
      • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch
  • Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Steve Checkoway
    • RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Glen Zorn
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18, Spencer Dawkins
  • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18, Nicolas Williams
    • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18, Nicolas Williams
      • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18, Nicolas Williams
      • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18, Simon Josefsson
    • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18, Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18, Simon Josefsson
• RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) toProposed Standard, Robert Dugal
  • RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard, Glen Zorn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) toProposed Standard, Rob P Williams
  • RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) toProposed Standard, peter.robinson
• Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC, Gerald Ash
  • [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC, Georgios Karagiannis
    • Re: [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC, Gerald Ash
      • Re: [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC, Georgios Karagiannis
• Question about BCP79's Section 4a and its Section 4.1, Todd Glassey
  • Re: Question about BCP79's Section 4a and its Section 4.1, Russ Housley
  • Re: Question about BCP79's Section 4a and its Section 4.1, Doug Ewell
• Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, Tony Hansen
  • Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, ned+ietf
  • Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, Dave CROCKER
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, SM
    • Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
    • Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, Tony Finch
  • Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, Julien ÉLIE
    • Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, Alexey Melnikov
• Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt, Joel M. Halpern
  • Re: Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt, Gerald Ash
    • Re: Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt, Magnus Westerlund
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02, Ben Campbell
  • Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02, Alfred Hönes
    • Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02, Ben Campbell
  • Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-03, Ben Campbell
• Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Russ Housley
• 3932bis approval, Jari Arkko
• Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Andrew Allen
  • Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, John Levine
      • Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Andrew G. Malis
      • Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, John R. Levine
      • Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Robert Elz
      • Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, John R. Levine
      • Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Robert Elz
      • Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Michael Dillon
    • Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Lars Eggert
  • RE: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Eran Hammer-Lahav
  • Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Andrew G. Malis
• RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Cullen Jennings
  • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), John C Klensin
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), ned+ietf
      • RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules), John-Luc Bakker
      • RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Russ Housley
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Thierry Moreau
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Simon Josefsson
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Dave Cridland
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Simon Josefsson
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Scott Brim
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Simon Josefsson
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Thierry Moreau
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Simon Josefsson
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Scott Lawrence
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Tobias Gondrom
      • RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Glen Zorn
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Scott Brim
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Simon Josefsson
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Simon Josefsson
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules), Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules), Dave CROCKER
    • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Scott Lawrence
    • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Stephan Wenger
      • RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules), Dan Wing
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules), Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), tytso
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Stephan Wenger
      • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Phillip Hallam-Baker
    • Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), John Levine
• RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Cullen Jennings
  • Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Alexey Melnikov
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Michael Montemurro
    • Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), tytso
    • Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Fred Baker
      • Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Andrew G. Malis
      • RE: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Contreras, Jorge
      • RE: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Contreras, Jorge
      • Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Fred Baker
• SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pkix-new-asn1-07, Richard Barnes
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Cullen Jennings
  • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Dave Cridland
    • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Dave Cridland
      • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, james woodyatt
      • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Stuart Cheshire
  • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Peter Dambier
    • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Stuart Cheshire
  • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Lawrence Conroy
    • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre
    • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Dave Cridland
      • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre
    • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Cullen Jennings
      • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Stuart Cheshire
      • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Stuart Cheshire
      • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, "Martin J. Dürst"
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Paul Vixie
    • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Bob Hinden
  • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, W.C.A. Wijngaards
    • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, W.C.A. Wijngaards
      • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Dave Cridland
    • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Stuart Cheshire
    • Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC, Andrew Sullivan