IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07), (continued)
  • Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07), Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Dave Cridland
  • Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07, Mary Barnes
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-freed-sieve-date-index-11, Ben Campbell
  • Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-freed-sieve-date-index-11, Ned Freed
    • Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-freed-sieve-date-index-11, Ben Campbell
• Beautiful Rado watches for less, Annmarie Mccracken
• April promo on watches, Robbie Parson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • April promo on watches, Earle Newsome
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-06.txt, Sally Floyd
• Vacation reply, leilaabbad
• ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, Ray Pelletier
  • Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, eburger
    • Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, Melinda Shore
      • Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, Melinda Shore
      • RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, Ed Juskevicius
      • Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, Melinda Shore
      • Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, John C Klensin
  • RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, David Harrington
  • Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, Pete Resnick
    • Re: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, Ray Pelletier
      • Re: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, Pete Resnick
      • RE: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration, Richard Shockey