IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys, (continued)
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
william(at)elan.net
- New RR problem not evidence that DNS needs to be replaced (was Re: SRV records considered dubious),
Ofer Inbar
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Mark Andrews
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Keith Moore
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Mark Andrews
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
John C Klensin
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Michael . Dillon
- Something better than DNS?,
Pekka Savola
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Keith Moore
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Peter Dambier
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Patrick Vande Walle
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Patrick Vande Walle
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
John C Klensin
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Michael . Dillon
- Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?,
John Levine
- Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?,
Peter Dambier
- Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?,
Joe Baptista
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Emin Gun Sirer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Emin Gun Sirer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Emin Gun Sirer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Patrick Vande Walle
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Carl Malamud
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Emin Gun Sirer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Emin Gun Sirer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
David Conrad
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Eliot Lear
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Emin Gun Sirer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Michael . Dillon
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Emin Gun Sirer
- Re: Something better than DNS?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys,
Michael . Dillon
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys,
Eliot Lear
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys,
Michael . Dillon
- SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Dave Crocker
- Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Eric Burger
- Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
John C Klensin
- Message not available
- Re: IM and Presence history,
John C Klensin
- Re: IM and Presence history,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IM and Presence history,
Dave Crocker
- Re: IM and Presence history,
John C Klensin
- Re: IM and Presence history,
Dave Crocker
- RE: IM and Presence history,
Brian Rosen
- Re: IM and Presence history,
Eliot Lear
- Re: IM and Presence history,
John C Klensin
- RE: IM and Presence history,
Brian Rosen
- Re: IM and Presence history,
Marshall Eubanks
- RE: IM and Presence history,
Janet P Gunn
- Re: IM and Presence history,
Dave Crocker
- Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys),
Eric Burger
- Replacing email protocols: First comes consensus on the requirements,
Dave Crocker
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys,
Tony Finch
- Re: DNS Choices,
Dave Crocker
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys,
Nelson, David
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' toProposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Avoid enhancement pills,
Jeffrey Robinson
Draft minutes of Wednesday plenary,
Brian E Carpenter
RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt),
Bernard Aboba
Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Fred Baker
review of draft-cam-winget-eap-fast-05.txt,
Bernard Aboba
Willing to serve a new term in the IAOC,
Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
RE: [Hubmib] Last Call: 'Managed Objects of EPON' to Proposed Sta ndard (draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib),
Lior Khermosh
ESP usage at IETF65,
Michael Richardson
About your health,
Jonathan Jackson
*.ppt slides,
Frank Ellermann
Test the sweets of the life yourself,
Edwin Scott
She will love you more than any other guy,
Adrian Collins
IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00,
Jim Martin
found verizon phone from 339 area code...,
Joel Jaeggli
Improving Security with Encryption,
King, Kimberly S.
Radia Perlman presentation,
Spencer Dawkins
Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...,
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Prepar edness (ieprep),
Dolly, Martin C, NPE
[no subject],
Scott W Brim
gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt,
Scott W Brim
RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Prepar edness (ieprep),
King, Kimberly S.
Comments on new sipping drafts?,
Rajesh Ramanathan
RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep),
King, Kimberly S.
Why are we still seeing new Internet-Draft announcements this week?,
Ross Finlayson
IETF 67 Streaming update...,
Joel Jaeggli
Lost Logitech headset,
Suresh Krishnan
lost and found,
Lucy Lynch
Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base),
Pekka Savola
RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt),
Bernard Aboba
[tsbsg13 at itu.int: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"],
Scott W Brim
The Party?s Almost Over (But Not Quite),
Susan Estrada
Found: lost SecureID card,
John
lost SecureID card,
john . loughney
On Nov 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:,
Sam Weiler
- Re: On Nov 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:,
Fred Baker
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Theodore Tso
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Lucy Lynch
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Avri Doria
- RE: nomcom and confidentiality,
Narayanan, Vidya
- RE: nomcom and confidentiality,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Bob Hinden
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Danny McPherson
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Bob Hinden
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Ralph Droms
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Danny McPherson
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
John C Klensin
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality,
Brian E Carpenter
- IPv6 calls for the new Internet,
Peter Sherbin
- Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?,
Danny McPherson
Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Janet P Gunn
How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?,
Lakshminath Dondeti
My availability for a new term as Operations & Management Area Director,
David Kessens
IETF67 Network is up!,
Jim Martin
The ietf blog should support atom,
Sam Hartman
Interesting news,
Patrick Lewis
IASA Reports - IETF 67, San Diego,
Lucy Lynch
Fwd: Factual correction,
Martin Duerst
Interesting turn of events,
Fred Baker
What IS 0EM Software And Why D0 You Care?,
Dalton Mitchell
IETF 67 audio-streaming, NOC info and webpage...,
Joel Jaeggli
hokeyp and MIP6 slots are colliding,
Madjid Nakhjiri
Encouraging nominations for IETF Chair,
Brian E Carpenter
FW: [Hubmib] Last Call: 'Managed Objects of EPON' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib),
Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
RFC Editor Letter of Intent,
Ray Pelletier
Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Sam Hartman
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Pekka Savola
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
James M. Polk
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Sam Hartman
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Scott W Brim
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Pekka Savola
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Fred Baker
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Sam Hartman
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Fred Baker
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Sam Hartman
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Pete Resnick
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Pete Resnick
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Fred Baker
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Michael . Dillon
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Pekka Savola
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
ken carlberg
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Janet P Gunn
- Message not available
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Janet P Gunn
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet EmergencyPreparedness (ieprep),
Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet EmergencyPreparedness (ieprep),
Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Michael . Dillon
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Michael . Dillon
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet EmergencyPreparedness (ieprep),
Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Robert G. Cole
Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Scott W Brim
Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Fred Baker
<Possible follow-ups>
re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
ken carlberg
Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
ken carlberg
Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
ken carlberg
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Sam Hartman
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
ken carlberg
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Sam Hartman
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Fred Baker
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Eliot Lear
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Janet P Gunn
- RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
Janet P Gunn
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep),
ken carlberg
Proper definitions of RFC-1212 and RFC-1215 not found,
Gaurav GOYAL
RE: References to XML 'documents',
Hollenbeck, Scott
Scary technology,
Fred Baker
Photoshop, Windows, Office,
Evan Russell
Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi),
Jari Arkko
Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv),
Bernard Aboba
Health,
Evan Murphy
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Health,
Dennis Morgan
My Corporation is building, designing the largest private Multicast network in the world,
Steve Giammarino \(US\)
Re: Inherent problems in the NEA architecture,
Bernard Aboba
Re: NEA compelling problem (but no deployment),
Bernard Aboba
Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to ...,
Scott Bradner
RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea),
Narayanan, Vidya
Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea),
Alan DeKok
<Possible follow-ups>
RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea),
Susan Thomson \(sethomso\)
RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea),
Keith Moore
Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea),
Alan DeKok
Qualified participant: Was RE: draft-kolkman-appeal-support,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: with merit?,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
San Francisco Digital Inclusion Strategy,
Kyse Faril
Check Your Health,
Carlos Cox
Re: Call for Nominations - NomCom06,
Sam Hartman
Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv),
Olaf M. Kolkman
Re: Requirements for Open Positions,
John C Klensin
[David Kessens] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683,
Sam Hartman
NAT TRAVERSAL IN SIP THROUGH IMS,
Ashfaaq H Poonawala
with merit? (was: draft-kolkman-appeal-support),
Robert Sayre
RFC Compliance Certification Authority?,
jax871-ietf
RE: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)' toDraftStandard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis),
Hollenbeck, Scott
legal issue of RFC3619,
Bill Su
RE: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)' to DraftStandard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis),
Hollenbeck, Scott
[no subject],
Unknown
Re: Response to appeal by Robert Sayre dated 2006-08-29,
Julian Reschke
RE: draft-kolkman-appeal-support,
Gray, Eric
Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...,
Aisenberg, Michael
[no subject],
Unknown
[no subject],
Unknown
call for documentation of legacy EAP methods,
Jari Arkko
event calendar,
Yaakov Stein
Streaming Audio for IETF67 - Starts Monday November 6th.,
Joel Jaeggli
I'm not in the office,
henk
Away 10/12-10/16: [L2TPEXT Milestones past due],
Carlos Pignataro
Re: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)' to Draft Standard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis),
Sam Hartman
RE: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- ...,
Scott Bradner
I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...,
todd glassey
Mail converted by MHonArc
