IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- Framework document scope (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), (continued)
- Framework document scope (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Alper Yegin
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
"Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta"
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Sam Hartman
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Bernard Aboba
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Sam Hartman
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA partly useful?,
Peter Dambier
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Florian Weimer
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Bernard Aboba
- NEA scope (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Alper Yegin
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Ralph Droms
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Jari Arkko
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Sam Hartman
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Ralph Droms
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Yoshihiro Ohba
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Avi Lior
- Message not available
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Lakshminath Dondeti
- Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Alper Yegin
- Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Alper Yegin
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Alper Yegin
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Alper Yegin
- Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Jari Arkko
- Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?),
Dave Crocker
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Fleischman, Eric
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
"Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta"
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Narayanan, Vidya
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Gray, Eric
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Narayanan, Vidya
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Narayanan, Vidya
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Narayanan, Vidya
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Avi Lior
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Gray, Eric
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Gray, Eric
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
Basavaraj Patil
Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt,
John C Klensin
cApitalization,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05,
Pasi.Eronen
negotiation of the parameters of SIP,
TANIOS Charbel
cdma 2000,
Ashfaaq H Poonawala
Re: Last Call: 'IETF Process and Operations Documentss' to Experimental RFC (draft-alvestrand-ipod),
John C Klensin
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Dave Crocker
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
John C Klensin
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Dave Crocker
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
John C Klensin
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Dave Crocker
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
John C Klensin
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Dave Crocker
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
John C Klensin
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Dave Crocker
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
John C Klensin
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Dave Crocker
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt,
Brian E Carpenter
Fwd: TLS authorizations draft,
Russ Housley
appeal against an IESG decision,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Ray Pelletier
- FW: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Ólafur Guðmundsson
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Yaakov Stein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fwd: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Allison Mankin
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Allison Mankin
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Black_David
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Black_David
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
Announcement! Call for Entries.,
Raju Sutar
RE: policy enforcement points and management [RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)],
Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Off topic: Montreal pipe organ builder tour,
Ole Jacobsen
RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp),
Pekka Savola
preserving unity within lingual and technical diversity,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
comments on <draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt>,
Craig Partridge
Announcement of the new work : Link Characteristic Information for Mobility,
Soohong Daniel Park
How widely have the Seamoby CARD and CXTP protocols been deployed?,
Fleischman, Eric
draft on network-based mobility management,
Soliman, Hesham
Location Change for IETF 67,
Ray Pelletier
Re: Last Call: 'The Tao of IETF - A Novice's Guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force' to Informational RFC,
Pekka Savola
2005-2006 NomCom Announcement,
Ralph Droms
Upcoming APPs area interim meeting (LEMONADE and EAI),
Ted Hardie
Possible General Area MiniBOF 4: Mailing lists management procedures,
Brian E Carpenter
Possible General Area MiniBOF 3: Appeals procedures,
Brian E Carpenter
Possible General Area MiniBOF 2: WG Procedures,
Brian E Carpenter
Possible General Area MiniBOF 1: IESG structure and charter,
Brian E Carpenter
Possible new work items in the General Area,
Brian E Carpenter
Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Peter Dambier
- Message not available
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Julian Reschke
- Message not available
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12,
Robert Sayre
Summer of Code: Event notification service for the IETF,
stanislav shalunov
IETF lists as RSS?,
Alexandru Petrescu
IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call,
Ray Pelletier
RE: [Fwd: Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations],
Beaulieu, Marcia
IETF 65 Survey,
Ray Pelletier
Merging PIDF documents from multiple sources,
Tor Noga
Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-idn-nextsteps-05,
Simon Josefsson
Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations,
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
IPv6 Subsets?,
Timothy J. Salo
Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Scott Leibrand
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Kevin Loch
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Kevin Loch
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Kevin Loch
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Masataka Ohta
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
william(at)elan.net
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Lixia Zhang
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Eliot Lear
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Joe Abley
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Kevin Loch
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Joe Abley
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Tony Hain
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Tony Hain
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Jari Arkko
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Martin Hannigan
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Patrick W. Gilmore
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Michel Py
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Noel Chiappa
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Michel Py
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Scott Bradner
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Scott Bradner
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Christian Huitema
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Jeroen Massar
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Keith Moore
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Tony Hain
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Keith Moore
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Eliot Lear
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Keith Moore
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Theodore Ts'o
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Keith Moore
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Theodore Ts'o
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Eliot Lear
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Erik E. Fair
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Erik E. Fair
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Tony Hain
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Michel Py
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Bound, Jim
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Bound, Jim
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Michel Py
- Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN],
Noel Chiappa
Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-hash-stuffing-05.txt,
Salowey, Joe
Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard,
Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard,
Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard,
John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard,
Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard,
Simon Josefsson
Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Noel Chiappa
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Peter Dambier
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Fleischman, Eric
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Michel Py
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Michel Py
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Michel Py
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Noel Chiappa
Seeking... IAB Executive Director,
Leslie Daigle
Copyright status of early RFCs,
John Levine
Sorry about the posting errors regarding the dkim draft.,
Douglas Otis
draft-ietf-dkim-threats-02 nit//Affects verification of messages?,
Douglas Otis
Syslog inquiry, what is TAG delimiter with regard to RFC 3164,
Johan Bosaeus
Syslog inquiry, TAG delimiters.,
Johan Bosaeus
Announcement of IAB member selection,
Ralph Droms
RE: Don't feed the trolls,
Soliman, Hesham
RE: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
OT: Japanese addresses (was: 128 bits should be enough for everyone),
Dave Aronson (re IETF)
PI space (was: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them),
Noel Chiappa
RE: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re:StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[no subject],
Unknown
IETF Social/Way-back machine presentation available online?,
Spencer Dawkins
Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Michel Py
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Austin Schutz
- IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Scott Leibrand
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Scott Leibrand
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Scott Leibrand
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Mark Andrews
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Mark Andrews
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Thomas Narten
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Scott Leibrand
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Tim Chown
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Tim Chown
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Stephen Sprunk
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:,
Steve Silverman
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:,
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:,
Austin Schutz
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:,
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:,
Theodore Ts'o
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:,
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:,
Dave Cridland
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:,
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:,
Peter Sherbin
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Stephen Sprunk
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.),
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Don't feed the trolls,
Pekka Savola
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Austin Schutz
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Scott Leibrand
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Scott Leibrand
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Austin Schutz
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Andrew McGregor
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Eliot Lear
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
John C Klensin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Peter Sherbin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
John C Klensin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Austin Schutz
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.,
Dave Cridland
Mail converted by MHonArc
