IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Announcements Archive]

Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, (continued)
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Jari Arkko
- RE: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Francis Dupont
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, David Kessens
  - Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    - Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, RJ Atkinson
    - Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, David Kessens
    - Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Sam Hartman
  - Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Spencer Dawkins
  - Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, RJ Atkinson
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Eliot Lear
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum
terminology proposal: NAT+PT, RJ Atkinson
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després
  - Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore
    - RE: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    - Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després
    - Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore
    - Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després
    - Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore
    - Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després
    - Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore

Mail converted by MHonArc