IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., (continued)
  • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Ted Hardie
  • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., James Galvin
    • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Stewart Bryant
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., James Galvin
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
    • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Dave Crocker
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., James Galvin
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Dave Crocker
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Jeffrey Hutzelman
      • Why was the trust setup as a Va. Entity? & no FTC linkage., todd glassey
  • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael StJohns
    • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Henk Uijterwaal
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)
    • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Ned Freed
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Randy Presuhn
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eliot Lear
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
      • Message not available
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael StJohns
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael StJohns
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eliot Lear
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Dave Crocker
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Jeffrey Hutzelman
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Theodore Tso
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Joel M. Halpern
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Richard Shockey
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Dave Crocker
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Richard Shockey
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Yaakov Stein
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Marshall Eubanks
      • [no subject], Jari Arkko
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Ned Freed
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Avri Doria
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Stewart Bryant
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Pete Resnick
    • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eliot Lear
      • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael StJohns
  • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Jeffrey Hutzelman
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Richard Shockey
  • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Cimbala, Matthew
    • Message not available
      • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Jefsey_Morfin
  • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
    • Size of pool (Was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...), Ole Jacobsen
      • Re: Size of pool (Was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...), bmanning
  • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Scott Bradner
  • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Scott Bradner
  • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Theodore Tso
    • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
      • 3797 details (was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...), Frank Ellermann
  • RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
      • Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Bill Fenner
      • Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
      • Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Andrew Newton
      • Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
      • Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin
      • Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
      • Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin
      • Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael Thomas
• Resend: RE: What is going on with the NOMCOM, Richard Shockey
• Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and, variations' to BCP, Elwyn Davies
• I'm looking for Pacific Islanders on the IETF, Franck Martin
• Measurements at IETF65., Andrea G Forte
  • Re: Measurements at IETF65., Joel Jaeggli
    • Re: Measurements at IETF65., Andrea G Forte
• RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for Multicast in L3 Provider-Provisioned VPNs' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l3vpn-ppvpn-mcast-reqts), benjamin.niven-jenkins
• [no subject], huangxiangkui
  • Re: One Mistake and One Question of RFC2812., Brian E Carpenter
• Message Delivery Delay, Delivery Subsystem
• [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps], Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps], Andy Bierman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps], Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps], Eliot Lear
      • Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps], Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps], Eliot Lear
      • Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps], Frank Ellermann
• Two other RFCs to be published as Historic (was Re: Expedited Handling Request for draft-ietf-ltru-registry, draft-ietf-ltru-matching, and draft-ietf-ltru-initial), Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru), Harald Alvestrand
• Deploying v6 was: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Announcement of mailing list for pre-congestion notification (PCN), Bruce Davie
• RE: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the I nternet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cr isp-iris-lwz), Gray, Eric
  • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the I nternet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cr isp-iris-lwz), Sam Hartman
    • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the I nternet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cr isp-iris-lwz), Andrew Newton
• L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Pekka Savola
  • Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Shane Amante
    • Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Keith Moore
      • Message not available
      • Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Keith Moore
      • knowing the technical background (was: Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only), JFC Morfin
      • Message not available
      • Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Keith Moore
    • Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Elwyn Davies
    • RE: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Shah, Himanshu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Noel Chiappa
    • Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Keith Moore
  • Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Keith Moore
  • Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: RFP Question for you Jorge... did anyone put a notice of "Responsibility for Copyright Violations" to the Publisher RFP Candidates?, Todd Glassey
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Sam Hartman
  • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Andrew Newton
    • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Sam Hartman
  • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Mark Townsley
    • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Sam Hartman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Todd Glassey
• RFP and BCP addition - receipt needs to be generated & RFC's that revise IETF process., todd glassey
• Re: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-laganier-ipv6-khi, julien . laganier
• draft-jennings-impp-vcard-07, Brian Suda
  • Re: draft-jennings-impp-vcard-07, Julian Reschke
• Re: New Version Notification - draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-04.txt, julien . laganier
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Frank Ellermann
  • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Andrew Newton
    • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Andrew Newton
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Lars Eggert
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Andrew Newton
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), kent crispin
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), william(at)elan.net
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Ted Faber
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Ted Faber
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Andrew Newton
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Ned Freed
      • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Marcos Sanz/Denic
    • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Frank Ellermann
  • Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz), Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license), Frank Ellermann
  • Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license), James M Snell
    • Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license), James M Snell
      • Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license), James M Snell
      • Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license), James M Snell
      • feed-license-08 (was: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: feed-license-08, James M Snell
• RFP Question for you Jorge... did anyone put a notice of "Responsibility for Copyright Violations" to the Publisher RFP Candidates?, todd glassey
• administrative question on RFC publications, Jefsey Morfin
  • Message not available
    • Re: administrative question on RFC publications, todd glassey
      • Re: administrative question on RFC publications, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: administrative question on RFC publications, JFC Morfin
      • Re: administrative question on RFC publications, todd glassey
      • Re: administrative question on RFC publications, JFC Morfin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • re: administrative question on RFC publications, Joyce Reynolds
    • re: administrative question on RFC publications, JFC Morfin
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Harald Alvestrand
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], JFC Morfin
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], JFC Morfin
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Sam Hartman
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Harald Alvestrand
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Ned Freed
  • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Sam Hartman
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt], Gray, Eric
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt, Frank Ellermann
• RFC 4612 - historic status, Yaakov Stein
  • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Brian E Carpenter
    • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Yaakov Stein
    • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Dave Crocker
      • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Paul E. Jones
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, todd glassey
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, JFC Morfin
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Eliot Lear
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Paul E. Jones
      • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, John C Klensin
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Colin Perkins
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, John C Klensin
      • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Paul E. Jones
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, todd glassey
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Frank Ellermann
      • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Paul E. Jones
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, todd glassey
      • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Paul E. Jones
      • Re: RFC 4612 - historic status, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Ned Freed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Yaakov Stein
  • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Ned Freed
  • RE: RFC 4612 - historic status, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Todd Glassey
  • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Yaakov Stein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Gray, Eric
    • RE: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Yaakov Stein
      • Re: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Keith Moore
• draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-01.txt, Brian E Carpenter
  • pet request (was Re: draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-01.txt), JFC Morfin
    • Re: pet request, Frank Ellermann
• 16ng Interim - September 12-13, Frankfurt, Soohong Daniel Park
• RE: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Middlebox Communication' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-midcom-mib), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
  • Re: [midcom] RE: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Middlebox Communication' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-midcom-mib), Pyda Srisuresh
• Clustered Signaling Gateways specifications, Satya Prasad Nemana
  • RE: Clustered Signaling Gateways specifications, Ajay goel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Clustered Signaling Gateways specifications, Todd Glassey
• Level Compression Recovery, Renato Fabbri
• Re: Document Action: 'Requirements for IETF Technical Publication Service' to Informational RFC, Frank Ellermann
• Autoreply: away from desk, Olaf M. Kolkman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Autoreply: away from desk, Olaf M. Kolkman
  • Autoreply: away from desk, Olaf M. Kolkman
• RFC Editor RFP Announcement, Ray Pelletier
• Re: Terms used in rules-update-07, Todd Glassey
• Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Reque, Bob Braden
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
  • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
    • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Bernard Desruisseaux
      • Re: Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Robert Sayre
      • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
      • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Bernard Desruisseaux
      • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
      • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
      • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Bernard Desruisseaux
    • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Lisa Dusseault
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Cyrus Daboo
    • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
      • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Robert Sayre
      • Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: 'Document Shepherding From Working Group Last Call to IESG Approval' to Informational RFC, Frank Ellermann
• Draft minutes from General Area open meeting, Brian E Carpenter
• Draft Wednesday plenary minutes, Brian E Carpenter
• regarding Editors and their 'recreating new ip'..., todd glassey
  • Re: regarding Editors and their 'recreating new ip'..., Joe Touch
• Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?, Hadmut Danisch
  • Re: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?, todd glassey
  • Re: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?, Russ Housley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • RE: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?, todd glassey
  • RE: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?, Bob Braden
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Brian E Carpenter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Allison Mankin
    • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
  • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, John C Klensin
    • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, John C Klensin
      • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Joe Touch
  • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Todd Glassey
    • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, John C Klensin
      • Proposal for slightly modified vetting commitment., todd glassey
• OT - Post-SOX Thinking in US Public Companies (was Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL), Scott Kitterman
• Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL, todd glassey
  • Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL, Jeffrey Hutzelman
    • Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL, todd glassey
      • Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL, Jeffrey Altman
      • Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL, todd glassey
      • Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL, Russ Allbery
      • Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL, todd glassey
  • RE: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL, Brian Rosen
    • Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL, todd glassey
• Novell IETF bag, Philip Matthews
  • Re: Novell IETF bag, Ned Freed
    • Re: Novell IETF bag, Sandy Wills
    • Re: Novell IETF bag, Tom.Petch
• Question about the folks providing the WG Mailing List services?, todd glassey
• Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles, John C Klensin
  • Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles, JFC Morfin
    • IANA, Unicode, and the multilingual Internet, Martin Duerst
      • Re: IANA, Unicode, and the multilingual Internet, JFC Morfin
  • Re: Appeal's purposes (was appeals, post-appeal, etc.), JFC Morfin
  • Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles, John C Klensin
      • Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles, Frank Ellermann
• Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: Data format error, Low, Celestine
• tsv-area mailing list, Lars Eggert
• The IETF's Standadrs Process should produce a Intellectual Property Portfolio, todd glassey
• San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Burger, Eric
  • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Andrew G. Malis
  • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Dave Crocker
      • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Eliot Lear
      • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Joel Jaeggli
      • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Clint Chaplin
      • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Scott W Brim
      • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Clint Chaplin
      • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Andrew G. Malis
      • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Melinda Shore
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Bob Braden
  • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Henrik Levkowetz
    • No code of conduct. No "hold-harmless" sections of the IETF's participation agreements has an interesting effect..., todd glassey
    • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Eliot Lear
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Eliot Lear
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Doug Barton
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Bill Fenner
    • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
    • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Bill Fenner
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Tony Hansen
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Tom.Petch
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, John Levine
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Thomas Narten
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Henrik Levkowetz
    • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Robert Elz
  • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Bob Braden
  • RFC Editor RFP Review Request, IETF Administrative Director
    • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Scott Kitterman
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Geoff Huston
    • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
  • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Allison Mankin
  • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, John C Klensin
    • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Jeffrey Hutzelman
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, John C Klensin
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Ted Hardie
      • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Leslie Daigle
      • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Ted Hardie
      • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Joe Touch
      • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Leslie Daigle
      • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Joe Touch
      • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Eliot Lear
      • Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Joe Touch
      • Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Keith Moore
      • Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Joe Touch
      • Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Keith Moore
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Yaakov Stein
      • Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Yaakov Stein
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, John C Klensin
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Ted Hardie
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, John C Klensin
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Ted Hardie
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, John C Klensin
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Andy Bierman
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Jeffrey Hutzelman
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, John C Klensin
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
      • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Joe Touch
  • Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Todd Glassey
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...], Todd Glassey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Response to the Appeal by [...], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • Re: Response to the Appeal by [...], todd glassey
    • Re: Response to the Appeal by [...], JFC Morfin
  • Re: Response to the Appeal by [...], todd glassey
    • Re: Response to the Appeal by [...], todd glassey
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs, Todd Glassey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Minutes and jabber logs, Todd Glassey
  • RE: Minutes and jabber logs, Gray, Eric
    • Re: Minutes and jabber logs, todd glassey
    • Re: Minutes and jabber logs, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Pete Resnick
  • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Dave Crocker
    • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Joe Touch
      • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Dave Crocker
      • Message not available
      • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Dave Crocker
      • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Ned Freed
      • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, todd glassey
  • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Brian E Carpenter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Todd Glassey
    • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Marcus Leech
      • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Joe Touch
  • RE: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Fleischman, Eric
    • RE: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, John C Klensin
      • Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review, Dave Crocker
• +1, Michael Thomas
  • RE: +1, David Harrington
    • Re: +1, Eliot Lear
  • Re: +1, Henrik Levkowetz
  • Re: +1, Dave Crocker
  • Re: +1, Tim Bray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: +1, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• regarding retransmission of Control message after receive error form peer end, Padmalochan Moharana
• ITU-T 50th anniversary, Jefsey Morfin
• Adding WAE Jabber Room at 12:00noon ET (1 minute downtime), IETF Secretariat
• Revised draft of Last Call document (draft-miller-media-type-cellml), Andrew Miller
• Currency Exchange in Montreal, Clint Chaplin
  • Re: Currency Exchange in Montreal, Jim Fenton
• Meetings in other regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
  • Re: Meetings in other regions, Pekka Savola
    • Re: Meetings in other regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Henk Uijterwaal
    • Re: Meetings in other regions, Fred Baker
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Joe Abley
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Patrick Vande Walle
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Patrick Vande Walle
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: Meetings in other regions, Stephane H. Maes
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Jeffrey Altman
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Melinda Shore
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Melinda Shore
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Dave Cridland
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Melinda Shore
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Dave Cridland
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Melinda Shore
      • RE: Meetings in other regions, Richard Shockey
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Fred Baker
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Joel Jaeggli
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Tim Chown
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Spencer Dawkins
      • Minutes and jabber logs, David Harrington
      • Re: Minutes and jabber logs, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Minutes and jabber logs, Eliot Lear
      • Re: Minutes and jabber logs, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Minutes and jabber logs, Jeffrey Hutzelman
      • Re: Minutes and jabber logs, Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: Minutes and jabber logs, Thomas Narten
      • Re: Minutes and jabber logs, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Edward Lewis
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Joel Jaeggli
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Jeffrey Hutzelman
      • RE: Meetings in other regions, Richard Shockey
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, JFC Morfin
      • RE: Meetings in other regions, Tony Hain
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, todd glassey
    • Re: Meetings in other regions, Russ White
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
      • RE: Meetings in other regions, Darryl \(Dassa\) Lynch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Meetings in other regions, Sam Weiler
    • Room Rates RE: Meetings in other regions, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
    • Re: Meetings in other regions, Henk Uijterwaal
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: Meetings in other regions, Fred Baker
    • Re: Meetings in other regions, Scott W Brim
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Fred Baker
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Scott W Brim
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Avri Doria
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Joel Jaeggli
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Tony Hansen
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Fred Baker
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Tony Hansen
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Edward Lewis
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Joel Jaeggli
      • RE: Meetings in other regions, Stephane H. Maes
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
      • RE: Meetings in other regions, Stephane H. Maes
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, bmanning
      • RE: Meetings in other regions, Darryl \(Dassa\) Lynch
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • Re: Meetings in other regions, Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Meetings in other regions, Fred Baker
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Fred Baker
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Jeffrey Hutzelman
  • Re: Meetings in other regions, Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Meetings in other regions, Scott W Brim
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Henrik Levkowetz
      • Re: Meetings in other regions, Jari Arkko
  • RE: Meetings in other regions, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • RE: Meetings in other regions, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • Re: Meetings in other regions, John C Klensin