IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?,
Nicholas Staff
Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
grenville armitage
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Robert Elz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Stuart Cheshire
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Bernard Aboba
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Bernard Aboba
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Bernard Aboba
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Bernard Aboba
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Bill Manning
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Ned Freed
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call,
Bernard Aboba
- .local [Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call],
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: .local,
Frank Ellermann
- 2606bis (was: .local),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: 2606bis (was: .local),
John C Klensin
- Re: 2606bis (was: .local),
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: 2606bis,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: 2606bis,
Bill Fenner
- Re: 2606bis,
John C Klensin
- Re: 2606bis,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: 2606bis,
Brian E Carpenter
Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Pekka Savola
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
grenville armitage
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Melinda Shore
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Melinda Shore
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Pete Resnick
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Scott W Brim
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Pete Resnick
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Richard Shockey
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Adam Roach
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Scott Michel
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Yaakov Stein
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Yaakov Stein
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
Yaakov Stein
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
sbrim
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-blanchet-v6ops-routing-guidelines-00.txt,
Bill Manning
RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area,
john . loughney
RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charterbroken- onus should be on WG to fix it)],
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
John C Klensin
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Leslie Daigle
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
C. M. Heard
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Pekka Savola
- Re: IETF Process Evolution,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Control RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)],
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter br oken- onus should be on WG to fix it)],
Gray, Eric
RE: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should beon WG to fix it),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)],
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: BitTorrentvs MBONE,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: WG Review: Recharter of Integrated Security Model for SNMP (isms),
C. M. Heard
Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Fw: IETF Tools,
Spencer Dawkins
RE: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Nelson, David
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Sam Hartman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Sam Hartman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Michael Thomas
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Michael Thomas
- BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it),
Paul Hoffman
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it),
Michael Thomas
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it),
Paul Hoffman
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it),
Scott W Brim
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it),
Michael Thomas
- net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)],
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)],
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)],
Marc Manthey
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)],
Michael Thomas
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)],
Nicholas Staff
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it),
Thomas Narten
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it),
Michael Thomas
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it),
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- CH and p2p [Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it],
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Juergen Schoenwaelder
ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it,
Eliot Lear
Re: [Isms] WG Review: Recharter of Integrated Security Model for,
Keith McCloghrie
RE: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Ltru] Re: The LTRU initialization document,
McDonald, Ira
20 years later - where are we?,
Michael StJohns
RFC 3066 bis Libraries list,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initializationdocuments,
Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry andinitialization documents,
Peter Constable
Re: LLMNR news you can lose,
Bernard Aboba
Re: Stuart's comments,
Bernard Aboba
Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion] (fwd),
Dean Anderson
RE: Model patent license (RE: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denieddiscussion] ),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
IETF64 hotel already full?,
Pekka Savola
RE: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denieddiscussion],
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion],
Dean Anderson
Vint Cerf joins Google,
Gene Gaines
ISMS working group,
Ken Arnold
Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Stuart Cheshire
RE: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Stuart Cheshire
RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
Addison Phillips
Question on level_idc in Session Description Protocol, RFC3984,
ming
ISMS working group and charter problems,
Eliot Lear
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Dave Crocker
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Eliot Lear
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Thomas Gal
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Daniel Senie
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Melinda Shore
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Thomas Gal
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Dave Singer
- Firewall considerations (Re: ISMS working group and charter problems),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Juergen Quittek
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Fleischman, Eric
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Fleischman, Eric
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Fleischman, Eric
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Nelson, David
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Keith McCloghrie
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Dave Crocker
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Tom Petch
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Sam Hartman
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Sam Hartman
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Keith McCloghrie
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Eliot Lear
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Eliot Lear
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Eliot Lear
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Eliot Lear
- Fwd: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Rich Morin
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems,
Jim Thompson
- ISMS working group and charter problems,
Brent Chapman
Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
John C Klensin
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
Sam Hartman
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
John C Klensin
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
Sam Hartman
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
John C Klensin
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
Doug Ewell
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
Doug Ewell
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
John C Klensin
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
Doug Ewell
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
John.Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents (issue #878),
Randy Presuhn
- The LTRU initialization document (was: Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents (issue #878)),
John C Klensin
- Re: The LTRU initialization document,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: The LTRU initialization document,
John C Klensin
- Re: The LTRU initialization document,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents (issue #878),
r&d afrac
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
Frank Ellermann
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents,
John C Klensin
tools.ietf.org is not working ?,
Soohong Daniel Park
Request for NomCom05 Volunteers,
Ralph Droms
IETF last call on draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines-05: The practical case of SMS and MMS URI schemes,
Markus . Isomaki
RE: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Dave Singer
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Keith Moore
- Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Tony Finch
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Jeroen Massar
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Bill Manning
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Tony Finch
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Tony Finch
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Daniel Senie
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...),
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Ian Jackson
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Peter Dambier
RE: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Stuart Cheshire
Re: STD,
Doug Ewell
RE: Enough is enough: Intent to file an RFC 3683 against Jefsey Morfin,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard,
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Peter Dambier
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Bill Manning
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Marc Manthey
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Peter Dambier
- Alternative roots (was: Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard),
Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Christian de Larrinaga
- Single DNS root (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Single DNS root,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Single DNS root,
John C Klensin
- Re: Single DNS root,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Peter Dambier
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Jeroen Massar
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR) ' to Proposed Standard,
Ned Freed
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Peter Dambier
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Daniel Karrenberg
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Peter Dambier
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Ian Jackson
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Tony Finch
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard,
Andrew Sullivan
Re: Enough is enough: Intent to file an RFC 3683 against Jefsey Morfin (Harald Tveit Alvestrand),
Peter Constable
RE: Is it necessary to go through Standards Track to Get to Histo ric?,
Gray, Eric
Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822,
william(at)elan.net
Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822,
Brian E Carpenter
RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP [Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 16, Issue 95],
Peter Constable
Enough is enough: Intent to file an RFC 3683 against Jefsey Morfin,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 16, Issue 95,
Peter Constable
e: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict,
Go Mehwua
Re: [Ltru] RE: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP),
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP),
Doug Ewell
STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP),
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: Reply-To,
Bruce Lilly
Re: Is it necessary to go through Standards Track to Get to Historic?,
Bruce Lilly
Autoresponder lameness,
Bruce Lilly
Reply-To (Was Re: [Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful]),
Bruce Lilly
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Bruce Lilly
- Is it necessary to go through Standards Track to Get to Historic? (WAS: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02),
C. M. Heard
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Pekka Savola
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Sam Hartman
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Julian Mehnle
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Dick St.Peters
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Julian Mehnle
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Dick St.Peters
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
Mail converted by MHonArc
