IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- No debate-Solutions? IAB/ISOC Sponsorship? Re: off-list, Re: IAB/ISOC not IETF Charter Re: What isat stake?, (continued)
- Bagged cats and DNS elfs,
Dan Kolis
- Impossible suggestions,
Brian E Carpenter
- Revision to RFC2727 - NOMCOM,
James M Galvin
- What is at stake?,
Ed Gerck
- Re: What is at stake?,
Gary E. Miller
- Re: What is at stake?,
Ari Ollikainen
- Re: What is at stake?,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: What is at stake?,
Michael StJohns
- Re: What is at stake?,
vint cerf
- Re: What is at stake?,
Michael Hammer
- Re: What is at stake?,
vint cerf
- Re: What is at stake?,
Tony Hansen
- Re: What is at stake?,
Bill Manning
- Re: What is at stake?,
Ed Gerck
- Re: What is at stake?,
Dave Crocker
- Re: What is at stake?,
Ed Gerck
- Re: What is at stake?,
Keith Moore
- Re: What is at stake?,
Ed Gerck
- Re: What is at stake?,
Einar Stefferud
- RE: What is at stake?,
Tony Hain
- Perceptions... Re: What is at stake?,
grenville armitage
- Re: Perceptions... Re: What is at stake?,
Einar Stefferud
- Re: What is at stake?,
Dave Crocker
- Re: What is at stake?,
Michael StJohns
- of control and frogs, Re: What is at stake?,
Ed Gerck
- Re: What is at stake?,
Joel Jaeggli
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: What is at stake?,
Franck Martin
- RE: What is at stake?,
Christian Huitema
- RE: What is at stake?,
Dave Crocker
- RE: What is at stake?,
Julia Finnegan
- Re: What is at stake?,
Lloyd Wood
- Re: What is at stake?,
Greg Skinner
- putting vendors' feet to the fire,
Keith Moore
- Schedule after Yokohama,
Yutaka SAKAI
- RE: Last Call: Message Disposition Notification to Draft Standard,
Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg)
- Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH! We do (maybe) need more stinking bandwidth,
Dan Kolis
- Please note this was NOT from me to the list but was redirected by Stef to the list (a bad practice),
David Farber
- IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
David Farber
- Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Randy Bush
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Einar Stefferud
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Randy Bush
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Marshall T. Rose
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Theodore Tso
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Einar Stefferud
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Ed Gerck
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Randy Bush
- conformance != enforcement, Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Ed Gerck
- Re: conformance != enforcement, Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Christopher Evans
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Keith Moore
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Henning G. Schulzrinne
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Ed Gerck
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Doug Royer
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Tony Hain
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- putting vendors' feet to the fire,
Keith Moore
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Ed Gerck
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Keith Moore
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Keith Moore
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Marshall T. Rose
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Keith Moore
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Marshall T. Rose
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Getty Verma
- how do we do conformance?,
Michael Richardson
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Fred Baker
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Franck Martin
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Sabharwal, Atul
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Franck Martin
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Franck Martin
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Michel Py
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Mak, L (Leen)
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Franck Martin
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Morgan, Peter (Engineering)
- FW: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Ed Mier
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Davis, Charles
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Vernon Schryver
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Michel Py
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Keith Moore
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Franck Martin
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Bob Braden
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification,
Kyle Lussier
- Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth... we gots labels and a fancy RSVP to fix us up!,
Dan Kolis
- Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth,
Dan Kolis
- Re: Last Call: Message Disposition Notification to Draft Standard,
Graham Klyne
- SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c to HISTORIC,
C. M. Heard
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Sean Doran
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53),
Jeffrey Altman
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Ran Atkinson
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC)
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Scott Brim
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Dave Crocker
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Jon Crowcroft
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Randy Bush
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Dave Crocker
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Lloyd Wood
- Message not available
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Dave Crocker
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc.,
Aaron Falk
<Possible follow-ups>
RE: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53),
Michel Py
Strip-O-Text, Mobi-Cam, SMS Party Pack: - Brand New lot`s of FUN!,
Entertainment 4 mobile users
Re: Plenaries at IETF 53,
Marc Blanchet
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53,
Rodney Thayer
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53,
Pekka Savola
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53,
Susan Harris
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53,
John Border
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53,
Scott Brim
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53,
Holdrege, Matt
- RE: Plenaries at IETF 53,
Tony Hain
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53,
Henning G. Schulzrinne
- RE: Plenaries at IETF 53,
Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
MPTP,
Wenyue Zhang
one copy sent to list but THREE returned,
Gordon Cook
Empowering the Customer or Empowering the Telco - State of the Internet 2002 (abridged) Published annually to the IETF list,
Gordon Cook
Conference MIB,
Chai Forsher
128 bit IP addresses,
Bill Cunningham
Key Distribution mail list,
Edward Lewis
historical NIC activities report,
Chip Rosenthal
slm,
Serdar Kahya
- <Possible follow-ups>
- slm,
Serdar Kahya
Base64,
Daniel Kraft
Does JSSE support mutual authentication with PFX files?,
E Alaknantha
AW: AW: Software Module Information Protocol (SMIP),
Daniel Kraft
Software Module Information Protocol (SMIP),
Daniel Kraft
Software modules,
Daniel Kraft
viewgraphs from the IAB plenary last night,
Sally Floyd
Blue Sheet Etiquette,
borderlt
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Doug Royer
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Ross Finlayson
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Robert Moskowitz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Book, Robert
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
John Stracke
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
John Stracke
- RE: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Ian King
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
John Stracke
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Vernon Schryver
- RE: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Ian King
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Fred Baker
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
John Stracke
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
John Stracke
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
John Stracke
- Re: Blue Sheet Etiquette,
Tom Petch
wireless,
Randy Bush
the ascii discussion all over again...,
Leif Johansson
skiing,
Michael Richardson
abha ahuja,
Sean Doran
FW: [IT-PACNET] speaker for ICT events,
Franck Martin
Re: Room taps are alive,
itojun
On the Internet in a Disaster (Natl Academy study),
Craig Partridge
on personal wireless APs and wireless laptops,
RJ Atkinson
Room taps are live,
Tony Hain
Attention wireless lan congestion issues,
Olafur Gudmundsson
Justify what you are doing and why you are doing it,
ian
FAQ on RDMA available,
allyn
Code Red still at IETF 52 ?,
a . saha
ITU CDs are on the way,
Ostap Monkewich
End-to-End vision. Is it visionary ?,
Jiwoong Lee
IETF52: IPv6 in term room/wireless,
itojun
Change of room for RDMA on IP informal face-to-face meeting,
Stephen Bailey
social event registration,
Michael Richardson
New mailing list and ID on passive packet measurement,
Albert Greenberg
SDL Demo and ITU CD Q&A,
Ostap Monkewich
Regarding Traffic Generators of ATM cells,
Chandra Shekar Reddy Challagonda
Kerberos Query.,
Aneuya
Informal face-to-face meeting for discussion of RDMA on IP,
Stephen Bailey
ACTION REQUESTED: Call for nominations for IAB/IESG (2nd request),
Theodore Ts'o
TCP on Ethernet:[Re:] BGP on Ethernet,
Mareline Sheldon
BGP on Ethernet,
Mareline Sheldon
comment on SIP draft " draft-agrawal-sip-H.323-Interworking-01.txt ",
Chiou, Mark
Social at SLC?,
Eric Rescorla
Re: [e2e] DCP mail list,
demir
Cable modem spec(s) sites - lookie here,
Dan Kolis
Cable modem spec.,
None
about radius,
duyong16
ipngwg, please stop the insanity,
Zoch, Richard (TIFS)
Why is this thread alive? (was RE: Why IPv6 is a must?),
Ian King
Website password,
Julia Finnegan
Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, etc,
Dan Kolis
Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
John Stracke
IETF PGP Key Signing Party for Salt Lake City,
Theodore Ts'o
Please welcome...,
Bernard Aboba
Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP,
stanislav shalunov
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP,
Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP,
Francois D. Menard
- trying to reconcile two threads,
Fred Baker
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Alex Zinin
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Eric Rosen
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Anthony Atkielski
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Bob Hinden
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Howard Weiss
- RE: trying to reconcile two threads,
Tony Hain
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Daniel Senie
- RE: trying to reconcile two threads,
Dr. Carsten Bormann
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Robert Moskowitz
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Keith Moore
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Richard Shockey
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Tony Hansen
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Lloyd Wood
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Anthony Atkielski
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Matt Crawford
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP,
Ed Gerck
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP,
Joe Touch
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP,
John Stracke
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP,
John Stracke
Re: Last Call: Extensions to FTP to Proposed Standard,
Zefram
v6 at Salt Lake,
Perry E. Metzger
>about 802.1x,
duyong16
announcing a mailing list to discuss anonymous forwarding IDs,
Scott Bradner
example .procmailrc stuff for announce lists,
Eliot Lear
internet-drafts at ietf.org is broken,
ietf
Re: draft-ietf-pilc-link-design-08.txt,
Internet Draft Submission Manager
ACTION REQUESTED: Call for nominations for IAB/IESG (1st request),
Theodore Ts'o
Hello!who have the "Formal Authentication Model of Security Protocol Based on Intruder " codes?,
lijianxinipsec at 263.net
Splitting the IETF list,
Andy Bierman
on using HTML for the ietf-internet-draft-announce-digest-list,
Keith Moore
draft-allocchio-gstn-00.txt - request for comments!,
Claudio Allocchio
RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard,
Hollenbeck, Scott
Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Pete Resnick
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Michael Richardson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
John Stracke
- RE: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Ian King
- RE: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Brijesh Kumar
- RE: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Pete Resnick
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Leslie Daigle
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Pete Resnick
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Keith Moore
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Fred Douglis
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Gregory Neil Shapiro
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Keith Moore
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Melinda Shore
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Meritt James
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Robert Elz
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
Mark Allman
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?,
John Stracke
Mail converted by MHonArc
