IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM
  • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen
    • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos
• Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Eran Hammer-Lahav
  • Stepping back a bit Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Leslie Daigle
• ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), Jaap Akkerhuis
  • Re: ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), George Michaelson
    • Re: ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), Brian E Carpenter
• Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig
  • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Peter Saint-Andre
  • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lucy Lynch
    • RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lucy Lynch
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, John C Klensin
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, JFC Morfin
      • RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, James M. Polk
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lynn St.Amour
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Olaf Kolkman
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lynn St . Amour
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Joel Jaeggli
      • RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig
      • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Joel Jaeggli
      • RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Paul Hoffman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
• Question about the meaning of the following boilerplate statement..., TSG
  • Re: Question about the meaning of the following boilerplate statement..., TSG
• Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
  • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
• draft-p2pi-cooper-workshop-report, Vijay K. Gurbani
• Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Eric Burger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen
    • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen
  • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
• Some WG Mail Lists Archiving Incorrectly, Alexa Morris
  • Re: Some WG Mail Lists Archiving Incorrectly, Alexa Morris
• Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf
• Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard], Hector Santos
• Initial Version I-D Submission Deadline Extended to March 4, 2009, Alexa Morris
• Query regarding V2 Profile Classification (Profile 0x104), Chaitanya Pradeep
• Withdraw of [rt.amsl.com #13277]: Authentication-Results Header Field Appeal, Douglas Otis
  • Re: Withdraw of [rt.amsl.com #13277]: Authentication-Results Header Field Appeal, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: Withdraw of [rt.amsl.com #13277]: Authentication-Results Header Field Appeal, Harald Alvestrand
    • Re: Withdraw of [rt.amsl.com #13277]: Authentication-Results Header Field Appeal, Douglas Otis
• ISOC BOT nominees, IAB Chair
• Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, Cullen Jennings
  • Re: Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, SM
  • Re: Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, Julian Reschke
    • Message not available
      • Re: [xml2rfc] Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: [xml2rfc] Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, Julian Reschke
• Version of xml2rfc to produce drafts with new pre5378 IPR clause, Cullen Jennings
• unsubscribe me from the ie mailing list, upendra bhanja
• Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, The IESG
  • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Scott Kitterman
      • RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Stephen Kent
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Stephen Kent
      • RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis
  • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, John Levine
    • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Doug Otis
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Doug Otis
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis
  • [no subject], Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: appeal-otis-2009-02-16, J.D. Falk
    • Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, SM
• Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Noel Chiappa
  • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Stephen Farrell
  • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Steven M. Bellovin
    • RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Theodore Tso
      • RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Theodore Tso
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Ted Hardie
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Paul Hoffman
      • RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, TSG
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, TSG
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Stephan Wenger
      • RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen
      • RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Christian Huitema
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Steven M. Bellovin
      • RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, John Levine
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, ned+ietf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Noel Chiappa
  • RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Noel Chiappa
• Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Keith Moore
    • Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Joel Jaeggli
      • Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Keith Moore
      • Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Jari Arkko
      • Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), TSG
  • Re: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Lars Eggert
    • Re: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Fernando Gont
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Fernando Gont
• RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Noel Chiappa
  • Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Thomas Narten
    • RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Powers Chuck-RXCP20
      • RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Lawrence Rosen
      • RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Contreras, Jorge
      • Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Harald Alvestrand
      • RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Lawrence Rosen
      • Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), John Levine
      • Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), ned+ietf
      • Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), TSG
      • RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: Referencesto Redphone's "patent"), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re:Referencesto Redphone's "patent"), Powers Chuck-RXCP20
      • RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re:Referencesto Redphone's "patent"), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Paul Hoffman
      • Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Paul Hoffman
      • RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Michael B. Einschlag
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, John Levine
      • Message not available
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Michael Dillon
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Thierry Moreau
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Doug Ewell
      • Message not available
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Michael Dillon
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, John Levine
      • Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, TSG
      • Settlement proposal - Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy, TSG
      • Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Theodore Tso
    • Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Scott Brim
    • RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • IPR advice to avoid ignorant flame wars about patents, Lawrence Rosen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Noel Chiappa
• [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Henk Uijterwaal
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Jari Arkko
    • Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], John C Klensin
    • Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], John Levine
      • Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], John Levine
    • Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], David Morris
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Brian E Carpenter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Noel Chiappa
    • RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS
  • RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Noel Chiappa
    • RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS
  • RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Noel Chiappa
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Noel Chiappa
• Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Noel Chiappa
  • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Clint Chaplin
  • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Michael Dillon
    • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Rich Kulawiec
    • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Ofer Inbar
  • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Tim Bray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, David Morris
      • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Willie Gillespie
      • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, David Morris
      • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Ralf Weber
      • RE: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
      • RE: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, David Morris
      • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Cullen Jennings
      • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, David Morris
      • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Noel Chiappa
• LORAN is making a comeback.., TSG
  • Re: LORAN is making a comeback.., Robinson Tryon
    • Re: LORAN is making a comeback.., Gary E. Miller
      • Re: LORAN is making a comeback.., Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: LORAN is making a comeback.., Stewart Bryant
      • Re: LORAN is making a comeback.., Alexandru Petrescu
      • Re: LORAN is making a comeback.., Peter Dambier
• No to patent emcumbered standards, cramhead
• TLS Standard problem, Mark I. Berman
• DIME Phone Conference, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
• ECRIT Phone Conference, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
• "TLS authorization", John Wyatt
• TLS authorization and RedPhone Security patent, Stephen Pollei
• Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Alfred Hönes
  • Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Angelos D. Keromytis
    • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Hannes Tschofenig
      • Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Melinda Shore
      • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Hannes Tschofenig
      • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Josh Howlett
      • Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Sam Hartman
      • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Josh Howlett
      • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Kemp, David P.
      • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Hannes Tschofenig
      • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Hannes Tschofenig
      • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Josh Howlett
      • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Kemp, David P.
      • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Hannes Tschofenig
      • RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Josh Howlett
      • Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Melinda Shore
      • Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Peter Sylvester
• "TLS authorization" standard, Nuno Silva
• TLS authz licensing problem, Marek Kubica
• If you install Mail Filters how is the list integrity to be documented?, TSG
  • Re: If you install Mail Filters how is the list integrity to be documented?, Sam Hartman
    • Re: If you install Mail Filters how is the list integrity to be documented?, Peter Dambier
• Concern regarding Patented TLS Authorization spec, Stephen Paul Weber
• Comment on TLS-authz proposal, Larry West
• Comments on TLS-authz, Scott Goodwin
• Please say No to draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Shai Berger
• standard for TLS authorisation, Monique Chartrand
• Please reject Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions, Nolan Andres
• RE proposed standard draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07, Ryan McIntosh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RE proposed standard draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07, Ryan McIntosh
• re: (TLS) Authorization Extensions, Parker, Carlton L
• FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John Sullivan
  • Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Willie Gillespie
  • Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Paul Hoffman
    • Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John Sullivan
  • Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Sam Hartman
    • References to Redphone's "patent", Lawrence Rosen
      • Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Thierry Moreau
      • RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Lawrence Rosen
      • RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Ted Hardie
      • Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Thierry Moreau
      • How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Henning Schulzrinne
      • Re: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Michael Richardson
    • Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, ned+ietf
      • RE: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Powers Chuck-RXCP20
  • Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Byung-Hee HWANG
• Do not approve patent-encumbered TLS auth standard, Keith Dawson
• Comments opposing TLS-authz proposed standard, Aram
• serious concerns on TLS authorization standard enclosure, jaromil
• Proposed TLS-authz standard, Chris Charles
• opposing TLS-authz standardization, P. Oscar Boykin
• Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions <draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt>, Bryan Venable
• Please don't patent TLS! (TLS-authz), Jubal Kessler
• TLS Authorization: Proposed Patent-Encumbered Standard, jpangamarca
• No patent-encumbered standards, please., Ben Miller-Jacobson
• please do not publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Ward Vandewege
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: please do not publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Ward Vandewege
    • Re: please do not publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Mark Andrews
• Re: [A2k] TODAY/URGENT: Stop IETF Enactment of Patented Standard for TLS, Jeffrey A. Williams
• Comment on proposed TLS authorisation, Leon
• Comment on proposed patent-encumbered TLS authorization standard, Melbourne E. Wells
• yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, Bob Jolliffe
  • Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, Rich Kulawiec
  • Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, Stephan Wenger
    • Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, Stephan Wenger
      • Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, Simon Josefsson
      • IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Jari Arkko
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Tony Finch
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Jari Arkko
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Aaron Williamson
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Margaret Wasserman
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Tony Finch
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Jari Arkko
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Marshall Eubanks
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, TSG
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Scott O. Bradner
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Brian E Carpenter
      • Message not available
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Jaap Akkerhuis
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Simon Josefsson
      • Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility), Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility), Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility), Harald Alvestrand
      • Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility), Simon Josefsson
      • RE: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility), Pasi.Eronen
      • Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility), Simon Josefsson
      • (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility), Scott Kitterman
      • On the best use of IETF resources with respect to IPR, Paul Hoffman
      • Re: On the best use of IETF resources with respect to IPR, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility), Thierry Moreau
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Willie Gillespie
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Rémi Denis-Courmont
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt), Scott Brim
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, TSG
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Simon Josefsson
      • RE: IETF and open source license compatibility, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Jukka Ruohonen
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Wes Hardaker
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Wes Hardaker
    • Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, Bob Jolliffe
• LC announcements -- lessons to be learned?, Alfred Hönes
  • Re: LC announcements -- lessons to be learned?, Paul Hoffman
• Please do not approve standard for TLS authorization, Edgar J Young
• In protest of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, jim . smilanich
• FW: [IP] TODAY: Stop IETF Enactment of Patented Standard for TLS, Livingood, Jason
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FW: [IP] TODAY: Stop IETF Enactment of Patented Standard for TLS, Noel Chiappa
• Please do not approve TLS authorisation as a standard, Morgan Read
• We are against TLS, Tomer Cohen
• draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard, Ralf Weber
  • Message not available
    • Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard, Ralf Weber
  • Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf
    • Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard, Aaron Williamson
      • Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf
      • Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard, David Morris
      • Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf
    • Writeup (not) [Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard], Brian E Carpenter
• Request for "TLS Authorization Extensions" Rejection, cipindo . tanjaya
• Reject the proposed TLS-authz standard, Lucas
• Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07, Eric Rescorla
  • Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07, Thierry Moreau
    • Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07, Scott Brim
      • Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07, Thierry Moreau
    • Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07, Thierry Moreau
      • Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07, Aaron Williamson
      • Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07, Thierry Moreau
• TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Eric Rescorla
  • RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Steven M. Bellovin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Eric Rescorla
    • RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Powers Chuck-RXCP20
      • Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Melinda Shore
    • Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Michael StJohns
      • RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Pasi.Eronen
    • Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Tim Polk
      • Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, SM
• Re: Last Call: draft-jones-dime-3gpp-eps-command-codes (Diameter Command Code Registration for Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)) to Informational RFC, Cullen Jennings
  • Re: Last Call: draft-jones-dime-3gpp-eps-command-codes (Diameter Command Code Registration for Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)) to Informational RFC, jouni korhonen
  • RE: Last Call: draft-jones-dime-3gpp-eps-command-codes (DiameterCommand Code Registration for Third Generation PartnershipProject (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)) to Informational RFC, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
    • Re: Last Call: draft-jones-dime-3gpp-eps-command-codes (DiameterCommand Code Registration for Third Generation PartnershipProject (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)) to Informational RFC, Cullen Jennings
• Re: [PCN] Last Call: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture (Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Architecture) to Informational RFC, Fortune HUANG
• Patent-encumbered standards are not a good idea, Jose Lorenzo
• FSF whinging (again), Clint Chaplin
• restricting access to standard protocol languages, Michelle Wang
• The actual situation re. posting w/o subscribing, David Morris
• Patents in the Standard, Roy Schestowitz
• Internet Draft: Transport Layer Security (TLS) Evidence Extensions, Oron Peled
• Please do not approve patent-encumbered TLS authorisation standard, David Claughton
• Opposing the TLS authorization standard, Brendan Ribera
• Please Do Not Approve the Proposed Patent-Encumbered Standard for TLS Authorization., Jay Lee Jaroslav
• Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Alex Loret de Mola
  • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Ole Jacobsen
    • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Alex Loret de Mola
      • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Melinda Shore
      • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Alex Loret de Mola
      • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Melinda Shore
      • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Alex Loret de Mola
      • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Marshall Eubanks
      • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Doug Ewell
      • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Alessandro Vesely
      • RE: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • How does the IETF work? (was:Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Robinson Tryon
      • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Clint Chaplin
      • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Brian E Carpenter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation), Noel Chiappa
• Re: Welcome to the "IETF Honest" list (now go home!), Bernard Aboba
  • Re: Welcome to the "IETF Honest" list (now go home!), Dave CROCKER
• IETF standards should not be patent-encumbered, Robinson Tryon
• Keep Standards Open, McDowell, Perry (CIV)
• RE: why to contact the IETF, Noel Chiappa
  • Re: why to contact the IETF, Marshall Eubanks
  • RE: why to contact the IETF, Lawrence Rosen
• I am against the RedPhone Security as a IETF Standard, Joe Gulizia
• FSF's ... warning about TLS, terry white
• Comments on proposed TLS Authorisation Standard, Alan Lord (The Open Learning Centre)
• Please don't Accept the Patent-Encumbered Standard for TLS Authorisation, Shlomi Fish
• draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, Ivan Baldo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, yesmar
  • Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, Ivan Baldo
• FSF campaign against TLS-authz, Noel Chiappa
  • Re: FSF campaign against TLS-authz, Dean Anderson
• Please say NO to the TLS-authz standard, Răzvan Sandu
• Letter sent to FSF, needs a follow-up..., Alex Loret de Mola
• About tls-authz-standard, projects . gg . aaron
• Patent-Encumbered IETF Standard, teoverton
• Please REJECT proposal for "TLS authorization" standard, Chris Ward
• Eclipse plugin for authoring Internet-Drafts?, Dan York
  • Re: Eclipse plugin for authoring Internet-Drafts?, Julian Reschke
• Regarding TLS authorization, Munir Hasan
• campaigns at fsf.org, Блуд
• proposed TLS authz extension standard, Stefan Sels
• TLS authorisation proposal, glyn moody
• complains on Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions, mike
• Concern with draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07, Erik Hetzner
• Don't accept a patent crippled TLS-auth, Martin Olsson
• opposition to TLS-authz standard, Yahoo.co.uk account
• Comment to draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Martin Zoller
• Re: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Bernard Aboba
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Bernard Aboba
• Re: The IESG that can so "no!", Bernard Aboba
• Re TLS AUTHZ, Pavel Kichigin
• patented standards, Eric Johnson
• TLS Authz - Encumbered Standards are Not Standards, P.A.Long
• about RedPhone TLS-autz, Joshua Ismael Haase Hernández
• TLS AUTHZ, Максим Геннадьевич
• Request to refuse TLS authorization standard, Eric T Bavier
• Scrub proposed patented standard for "TLS authorization", Nilesh Kumar
• I'm opposed to the proposed TLS-authz standard, Michael Schenck
• RedPhone "Patent", J Prendergast
• RedPhone Patent On TLS Authorization, Denis Combs
• It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), Dave CROCKER
  • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest"mailing list]), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest"mailing list]), Scott Brim
      • Re: It's time for some new steps, Wes Hardaker
      • Re: It's time for some new steps, Randy Presuhn
      • The Dean list (was: It's time for some new steps), Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: The Dean list, Harald Alvestrand
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ietf-honest] It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest"mailing list]), Peter Saint-Andre
  • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), Scott Kitterman
  • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), Scott Brim
    • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), Cullen Jennings
      • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), Scott Brim
      • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), Dave CROCKER
      • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), Scott Brim
      • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), TSG
      • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), John Levine
    • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), David W. Hankins
      • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), Rich Kulawiec
    • Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list]), Clint Chaplin
• Re: how to contact the IETF, Noel Chiappa
  • Re: how to contact the IETF, Alex Loret de Mola
    • Re: how to contact the IETF, Clint Chaplin
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Alex Loret de Mola
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, John Levine
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, David Morris
      • List membership [Re: how to contact the IETF], Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: how to contact the IETF, Stephen Kent
    • Message not available
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Alex Loret de Mola
  • Re: how to contact the IETF, Tim Bray
    • Re: how to contact the IETF, Scott Brim
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Andrew Newton
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Michael Richardson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: how to contact the IETF, Noel Chiappa
  • Re: how to contact the IETF, Noel Chiappa
    • RE: how to contact the IETF, Ed Juskevicius
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Melinda Shore
      • RE: how to contact the IETF, Ed Juskevicius
    • Re: how to contact the IETF, Keith Moore
    • Re: how to contact the IETF, SM
  • Re: how to contact the IETF, Noel Chiappa
• Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 9, Issue 25, Alex Loret de Mola
  • Re: how to contact the IETF, Ofer Inbar
    • Re: how to contact the IETF, Alex Loret de Mola
    • Re: how to contact the IETF, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Melinda Shore
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Andrew Sullivan
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Melinda Shore
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Andrew Sullivan
      • RE: how to contact the IETF, Ed Juskevicius
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Cullen Jennings
      • RE: why to contact the IETF, Lawrence Rosen
      • Re: why to contact the IETF, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: why to contact the IETF, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Wes Hardaker
      • Re: how to contact the IETF, Andrew Sullivan
• Regarding Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions, Alex Loret de Mola
• patent threat for draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07, Rich Schultz
  • Re: patent threat for draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07, Clint Chaplin
    • Re: patent threat for draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07, Simon Josefsson