IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, (continued)
  • Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman
  • Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR) ' to Proposed Standard, Ned Freed
  • Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Peter Dambier
  • Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Daniel Karrenberg
  • Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Peter Dambier
  • Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Ian Jackson
  • Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch
  • Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Enough is enough: Intent to file an RFC 3683 against Jefsey Morfin (Harald Tveit Alvestrand), Peter Constable
  • Re: Enough is enough: Intent to file an RFC 3683 against Jefsey Morfin (Harald Tveit Alvestrand), Marc Manthey
• RE: Is it necessary to go through Standards Track to Get to Histo ric?, Gray, Eric
• Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822, william(at)elan.net
    • Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822, Tony Finch
      • Resent-* oddities (was: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* [...]), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Resent-* oddities (was: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* [...]), Tony Finch
      • Re: Resent-* oddities, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Resent-* oddities, Tony Finch
      • Message not available
      • Re: Resent-* oddities, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822, Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP [Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 16, Issue 95], Peter Constable
• Enough is enough: Intent to file an RFC 3683 against Jefsey Morfin, Harald Tveit Alvestrand