IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: What *are* they smoking? (fwd), (continued)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (fwd), Yakov Shafranovich
• Stupid DNS tricks, Adam Roach
  • Re: Stupid DNS tricks, Masataka Ohta
    • Re: Stupid DNS tricks, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: Stupid DNS tricks, Florian Weimer
• [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Yakov Shafranovich
  • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Neal McBurnett
  • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore
    • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Tim Chown
    • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Zefram
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Edward Lewis
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Bruce Campbell
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Bruce Campbell
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Edward Lewis
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., David Morris
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Edward Lewis
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Bill Manning
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Bill Manning
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., grenville armitage
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., hardie
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., hardie
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Tim Chown
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Tim Chown
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Larry Smith
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., william
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Anthony Atkielski
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Neal McBurnett
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Larry Smith
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Russ Allbery
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Larry Smith
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., John C Klensin
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Larry Smith
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Larry Smith
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., jfcm
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Bruce Campbell
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., bill
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Anthony Atkielski
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Anthony Atkielski
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Eric A. Hall
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer
      • RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., bill
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Tom Lord
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Anthony Atkielski
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], James M Galvin
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], James M Galvin
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], James M Galvin
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], David Morris
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], James M Galvin
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Rick Wesson
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Jaap Akkerhuis
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Anthony Atkielski
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Bill Sommerfeld
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], James M Galvin
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Yakov Shafranovich
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Yakov Shafranovich
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Simon Leinen
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Francis Dupont
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Dean Anderson
      • RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], bill
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Paul Vixie
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Bill Manning
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Paul Vixie
      • RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], bill
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Carl Malamud
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Masataka Ohta
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Anthony Atkielski
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], grenville armitage
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Michael Richardson
  • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Zefram
    • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Florian Weimer
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Paul Vixie
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Florian Weimer
    • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Karl Auerbach
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Kurt Erik Lindqvist
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Fwd: Verisign attempt to "take" all unpaid addresses, Gene Gaines
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • ICANN At-Large Advisory Committee response to Verisign "SiteFinder", Gene Gaines
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Vernon Schryver
    • Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Bruce Campbell
  • RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Gream, Matthew
• Developing software for IETF/IRTF groups, Yakov Shafranovich
  • Re: Developing software for IETF/IRTF groups, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Developing software for IETF/IRTF groups, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: Re: [Megaco] A question about H.248 on SCTP, zhou . zichun
• Skill page for classroom use., vcerf
• Careful with those spamtools....., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Careful with those spamtools....., Michel Py
  • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Shelby Moore
    • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson
      • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson
      • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson
  • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Shelby Moore
  • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dr. Jeffrey Race
    • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson
      • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Shelby Moore
  • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Valdis . Kletnieks
  • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dr. Jeffrey Race
    • Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson
• Shannon Entropy, channel protocols, and propensity for noise, Shelby Moore
• Re: Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques (was Re: You Might...), Valdis . Kletnieks
  • Re: Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques (was Re: You Might...), Shelby Moore
• Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Sergey Babkin
  • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Joel Jaeggli
      • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Sergey Babkin
      • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Dean Anderson
      • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Sergey Babkin
      • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Dean Anderson
      • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Sergey Babkin
    • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Bill Manning
  • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Fritz F. Saad
  • RE: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, MDX Technologies Inc.
  • Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Edward Lewis
• Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques (was Re: You Might...), Shelby Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques (was Re: You Might...), Shelby Moore
    • No censorship (Re: Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques (was Re: You Might...), Shelby Moore
• Re: literature review [ was: blah blah blah ], Bob Braden
• how to get a filename for ID?, wang liang
  • Re: how to get a filename for ID?, Donald Eastlake 3rd
  • Re: how to get a filename for ID?, Jari Arkko
• POP3 extensions - thanks, Dan Kolis
  • Re: POP3 extensions - thanks, Joel Jaeggli
    • Re: POP3 extensions - thanks, Russ Allbery
• weemail (was Proposal to define a simple architecture ...), jfcm
• POP SMTP etc extensions, Dan Kolis
• POP3 has no EHLO! (yup). There is no POP4, Dan Kolis
  • Re: POP3 has no EHLO! (yup). There is no POP4, Pete Resnick
• Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Graham Klyne
  • Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Doug Royer
    • Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Colin Perkins
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Jim Sermersheim
    • Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Doug Royer
    • Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Einar Stefferud
• The proper forum for evaluation of Spam proposals, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: The proper forum for evaluation of Spam proposals, Shelby Moore
• POP3 prograsm that enforce old message policies, Dan Kolis
  • Re: POP3 prograsm that enforce old message policies, John C Klensin
  • Re: POP3 prograsm that enforce old message policies, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: POP3 prograsm that enforce old message policies, Cyrus Daboo
• POP3 delivers, not deletes, Dan Kolis
  • Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Shelby Moore
  • Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • POP3 delivers, not deletes III, Dan Kolis
    • Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Shelby Moore
  • Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, John C Klensin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Shelby Moore
  • Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Shelby Moore
• [no subject], shogunx
  • [no subject], Randy Bush
  • Re: your mail, Pekka Savola
    • Re: your mail, Paul Vixie
• You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Vernon Schryver
  • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
  • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
  • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Vernon Schryver
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., grenville armitage
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
  • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Zefram
    • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Vernon Schryver
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Randy Bush
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Vernon Schryver
    • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Sandy Wills
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., grenville armitage
  • Message not available
    • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Randy Bush
      • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
  • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
  • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
  • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore
  • Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Valdis . Kletnieks
• Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
• Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
  • Message not available
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
• Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Johnny Eriksson
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Johnny Eriksson
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
• How to create ID in Windows system?, wang liang
  • Re: How to create ID in Windows system?, Scott W Brim
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: How to create ID in Windows system?, Haas, Chris
  • Re: How to create ID in Windows system?, Bob Braden
• Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), shogunx
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), shogunx
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiatelegitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), grenville armitage
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Vernon Schryver
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
    • Message not available
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiatelegitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), grenville armitage
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), shogunx
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
    • Message not available
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
    • Message not available
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), vinton g. cerf
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), John C Klensin
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), shogunx
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks
• Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), John C Klensin
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Keith Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Keith Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), shogunx
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • weemail (was Proposal to define a simple architecture ...), jfcm
      • Re: weemail (was Proposal to define a simple architecture ...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: weemail (was Proposal to define a simple architecture ...), jfcm
      • Re: weemail (was Proposal to define a simple architecture ...), Valdis . Kletnieks
  • Message not available
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Vernon Schryver
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Bill Strahm
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Bill Strahm
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Spencer Dawkins
      • Message not available
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson
      • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
  • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore
    • Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiatelegitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), grenville armitage
      • literature review [ was: blah blah blah ], Randy Bush
      • Re: literature review [ was: blah blah blah ], Bob Hinden
      • Re: literature review [ was: blah blah blah ], Joe Touch
      • Re: literature review [ was: blah blah blah ], Dave Farber
• network management!!, Shoaib Khan
• Re: Re: My details, wsimpson
• Input to Proceedings for the 57th IETF Meeting, Rebecca Bunch
• Portable voice services with switching between urban and home, Dan Kolis
• Draft on 97.0.0.0. network, Vinod Vasudevan
  • Re: Draft on 97.0.0.0. network, Bill Manning
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Draft on 97.0.0.0. network, Vinod Vasudevan
• ASON and OBS Performance, Syed Murtaza Haider Bilgrami
• RE: names, addresses, routes, Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar \(UMKC-Student\)
• [Fwd: Where to start?], Sheri Salami
• RE: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Robert . Shaw
  • RE: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Christian de Larrinaga
  • Re: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), S Woodside
    • Re: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Masataka Ohta
  • Re: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Masataka Ohta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Robert . Shaw
    • RE: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Randy Bush
• VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Dan Kolis
• Re: Details, agenda
• Well, Marketing maybe (SIP, etc), Dan Kolis
• Multimedia presentation services like (ugh) VoIP, Dan Kolis
• A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian
  • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson
  • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Zefram
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Eliot Lear
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Bill Strahm
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Marshall Rose
    • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, ned . freed
    • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Jean-Jacques Puig
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Marshall Rose
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Steve Conner
    • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, John C Klensin
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, John C Klensin
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, wang liang
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Jean-Jacques Puig
  • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michel Py
  • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Thomas
      • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, ned . freed
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Jari Arkko
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Jari Arkko
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Lyndon Nerenberg {VE6BBM}
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Andrew Newton
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, S Woodside
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson
    • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson
  • A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, wang liang
  • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian
  • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian
    • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Doug Royer
    • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, ned . freed
  • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian
    • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver
  • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian
  • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian
    • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Jean-Jacques Puig
  • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian
    • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver
  • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian
    • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver
      • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, John C Klensin
      • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Fw: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
  • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian
    • RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Thomas
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Melinda Shore
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Thomas
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Melinda Shore
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Pete Resnick
      • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver
  • Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• VoIP whatever, Dan Kolis
  • VoIP whatever, Michael Thomas
• the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside
  • Re: the VoIP Paradox, grenville armitage
    • Re: the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, grenville armitage
  • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Re: the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Scott Bradner
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Michael Richardson
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Scott Bradner
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Kireeti Kompella
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Michael Richardson
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Richard Shockey
    • Re: the VoIP Paradox, ned . freed
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Michael Richardson
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Michael Richardson
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Michael Thomas
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Dean Anderson
  • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Masataka Ohta
    • Re: the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside
      • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Masataka Ohta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: the VoIP Paradox, Rod . Walsh
  • RE: the VoIP Paradox, john . loughney
  • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Bob Natale
    • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Ole J. Jacobsen
    • Re: the VoIP Paradox, Greg Cunningham
• RE: Testing Root A going away, Christian Huitema
  • RE: Testing Root A going away, shogunx
    • RE: Testing Root A going away, Dean Anderson
  • Re: Testing Root A going away, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: Testing Root A going away, Keith Moore
  • RE: Testing Root A going away, Rick Wesson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Testing Root A going away, Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Re: Wicked screensaver, chris
• RE: where the indirection layer belongs, Yuri Ismailov (KI/EAB)
  • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Keith Moore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Keith Moore
  • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore
    • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Keith Moore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, jfcm
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Dave Crocker
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Pekka Nikander
      • names, addresses, routes, Dave Crocker
      • Re: names, addresses, routes, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: names, addresses, routes, Dave Crocker