IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: names, addresses, routes, (continued)
  • Re: names, addresses, routes, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: names, addresses, routes, Pekka Nikander
  • Re: names, addresses, routes, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore
  • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Spencer Dawkins
  • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Dave Crocker
  • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Pekka Nikander
  • A roadmap for end-point identifiers? (was Re: where the indirection layer belongs), Pekka Nikander
  • RE: where the indirection layer belongs, Yuri Ismailov (KI/EAB)
  • RE: where the indirection layer belongs, Yuri Ismailov (KI/EAB)
  • RE: where the indirection layer belongs, Yuri Ismailov (KI/EAB)
  • RE: where the indirection layer belongs, Michel Py
    • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Pekka Nikander
  • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, J. Noel Chiappa
• Multiple Address Service for Transport (MAST), Dave Crocker
  • Re: Multiple Address Service for Transport (MAST), Randy Bush
• Thank you!, wsimpson
• Re: wcard-clarify breaking RFC 2308 NXDOMAIN, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: wcard-clarify breaking RFC 2308 NXDOMAIN, Alan Barrett
    • Re: wcard-clarify breaking RFC 2308 NXDOMAIN, Paul Vixie
• [no subject], vcerf
• RE: ASN.1 (Re: Pretty clear ... SIP), Rosen, Brian
• Re: Last Call: 'Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Warranty Certificate Extension' to Informational RFC, Denis Pinkas
• Solving the right problems ..., Tony Hain
  • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore
  • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Robert Honore
    • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Tony Hain
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore
    • where the indirection layer belongs, Keith Moore
      • RE: where the indirection layer belongs, Tony Hain
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Keith Moore
      • RE: where the indirection layer belongs, Tony Hain
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Keith Moore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Keith Moore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Keith Moore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, vinton g. cerf
      • Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Keith Moore
    • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Melinda Shore
  • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randall R. Stewart (home)
    • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randall R. Stewart (home)
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., vinton g. cerf
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randall R. Stewart (home)
      • Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems ...), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems ...), Randall R. Stewart (home)
      • Re: Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems ...), Jari Arkko
    • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Dave Crocker
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randall R. Stewart (home)
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Dave Crocker
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randall R. Stewart (home)
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Solving the right problems ..., john . loughney
    • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Tony Hain
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Mika Liljeberg
      • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Jeroen Massar
  • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Jeroen Massar
    • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Tony Hain
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Tony Hain
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., S Woodside
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., jfcm
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Fred Templin
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Andrew McGregor
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Tony Hain
      • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Jeroen Massar
      • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Tony Hain
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore
      • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Jeroen Massar
      • RE: Solving the right problems ..., vinton g. cerf
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Dave Crocker
      • Re: Solving the right problems ..., vinton g. cerf
      • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Henry Sinnreich
  • Re: Solving the right problems ..., USPhoenix
    • Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randy Bush
    • Re: Solving the right problems ..., shogunx
    • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Henry Sinnreich
    • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Henry Sinnreich
  • Re: Solving the right problems ..., USPhoenix
  • Re: Solving the right problems ..., USPhoenix
  • RE: Solving the right problems ..., Yuri Ismailov (KI/EAB)
• Re: Internal WG Review: Recharter of ADSL MIB (adslmib), C. M. Heard
• ietf.org, Bill Cunningham
• Pretty clear ... SIP, Dan Kolis
  • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, S Woodside
  • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, Dean Anderson
    • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, Karl Auerbach
      • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, Rob Austein
      • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, Eric A. Hall
      • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, Dean Anderson
      • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, Karl Auerbach
      • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, Dean Anderson
      • ASN.1 (Re: Pretty clear ... SIP), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, Michael Thomas
      • Re: Pretty clear ... SIP, Stephen Kent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Pretty clear ... SIP, Eric Burger
• AW: www.ietf.org., Matthias Krawutschke
  • Re: AW: www.ietf.org., shogunx
    • RE: AW: www.ietf.org., Jeroen Massar
      • RE: AW: www.ietf.org., shogunx
      • RE: AW: www.ietf.org., Jeroen Massar
    • Re: AW: www.ietf.org., Randy Bush
      • Re: AW: www.ietf.org., shogunx
      • Re: AW: www.ietf.org., Randy Bush
      • Re: AW: www.ietf.org., shogunx
      • RE: AW: www.ietf.org., Tony Hain
      • RE: AW: www.ietf.org., Randy Bush
      • RE: AW: www.ietf.org., Tony Hain
      • RE: AW: www.ietf.org., shogunx
      • Re: AW: www.ietf.org., Iljitsch van Beijnum
• www.ietf.org., Clint Chaplin
  • Re: www.ietf.org., Randy.Dunlap
• Re: Moving the ipng mailing list, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
  • Re: Moving the ipng mailing list, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • IPv6 Support at IETF.ORG [was Moving the ipng mailing list], Bob Hinden
• Re: E-mail Caught by Spam Filter Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage, Richard Welty
• E-mail Caught by Spam Filter Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage an d Engineering (fwd), Valdis . Kletnieks
• Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues], NM Research
  • Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues], John Stracke
    • Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues], NM Research
      • Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues], Scott Bradner
      • Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues], NM Research
      • Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues], NM Research
      • Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues], Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: [Fwd: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues], Valdis . Kletnieks
• Requirement for equipment for API test suite, Tim Wright
• Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Marshall Rose
  • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Pekka Savola
  • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Peterson, Jon
    • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Dave Crocker
    • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Marshall Rose
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), vinton g. cerf
      • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Henry Sinnreich
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Keith Moore
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Richard Shockey
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Marshall Rose
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Richard Shockey
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), vinton g. cerf
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Keith Moore
      • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Lisa Dusseault
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Rohan Mahy
      • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Henry Sinnreich
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Keith Moore
      • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Henry Sinnreich
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Keith Moore
      • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Henry Sinnreich
      • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), David Morris
      • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Message not available
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Dave Crocker
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), David Morris
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Rohan Mahy
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Marshall Rose
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Marshall Rose
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Alan Johnston
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Rohan Mahy
      • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Keith Moore
  • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Peterson, Jon
  • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Peterson, Jon
    • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Ari Ollikainen
    • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Dave Crocker
  • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach
    • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach
  • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach
  • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach
    • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Marshall Rose
  • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach
  • RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach
    • Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Marshall Rose
• Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues, NM Research
  • Re: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues, grenville armitage
• Information from Unicode Consortium: Unicode Technical Note on "Deterministic Sorting" added, Patrik Fältström
• IPv6 WG chair needed, Thomas Narten
• Announcing Availability of free Cook Report back Issues, Gordon Cook
• fixed wireless mesh, S Woodside
  • Re: fixed wireless mesh, Vernon Schryver
    • Re: fixed wireless mesh, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: fixed wireless mesh, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: fixed wireless mesh, S Woodside
      • Re: fixed wireless mesh, Alexandru Petrescu
      • Re: fixed wireless mesh, S Woodside
      • Re: fixed wireless mesh, Charlie Perkins
      • Re: fixed wireless mesh, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: fixed wireless mesh, Tony Hain
      • Re: fixed wireless mesh, S Woodside
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: fixed wireless mesh, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Securing SNMPv3 via SSH tunnels, Fleischman, Eric
  • Re: Securing SNMPv3 via SSH tunnels, Bill Strahm
    • Re: Securing SNMPv3 via SSH tunnels, Uri Blumenthal
  • Re: Securing SNMPv3 via SSH tunnels, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Securing SNMPv3 via SSH tunnels, Fleischman, Eric
  • RE: Securing SNMPv3 via SSH tunnels, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
  • FW: Securing SNMPv3 via SSH tunnels, Harrington, David
  • RE: Securing SNMPv3 via SSH tunnels, Harrington, David
• edu-discuss mailing list, Margaret Wasserman
• doubt, Rohit Gupta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: doubt, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Plenary presentations, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Evidence of Symmetric Amplification of Light, NM Research
  • Re: Evidence of Symmetric Amplification of Light, Mr. James W. Laferriere
    • Re: Evidence of Symmetric Amplification of Light, NM Research
    • Re: Evidence of Symmetric Amplification of Light, NM Research
• IETF financials for 2002, and budget for 2003, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Meeting, Bill Cunningham
• IETF meeting, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: IETF meeting, Dave Aronson
• when is the wireless going away?, Aaron Falk
• Korean cell phones, Ole J. Jacobsen
  • Re: Korean cell phones, Carsten Bormann
  • Re: Korean cell phones, Joe Abley
    • Re: Korean cell phones, Randy Bush
• more stuff that was good, Leif Johansson
  • IETF locations, Jari Arkko
• Two lost SecureID tokens found at the Crown Plaza, Andrew G. Malis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Two lost SecureID tokens found at the Crown Plaza, Andrew G. Malis
• Critique vs Criticism - Plenary comments, Michael StJohns
  • Re: Critique vs Criticism - Plenary comments, Michael Richardson
    • Re: Critique vs Criticism - Plenary comments, Tim Chown
      • Re: Critique vs Criticism - Plenary comments, Michael Richardson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Critique vs Criticism - Plenary comments, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
  • RE: Critique vs Criticism - Plenary comments, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: Critique vs Criticism - Plenary comments, Eric Rescorla
      • Re: Critique vs Criticism - Plenary comments, Michael Richardson
• help wanted, Randy Bush
• Vienna wireless/networking..., Tim Chown
  • RE: Vienna wireless/networking..., Jeroen Massar
• plenary power, Robert M. Enger
• in-addr.arpa missing, Randy Bush
  • Re: in-addr.arpa missing, Leif Johansson
    • Re: in-addr.arpa missing, Randy Bush
      • Re: in-addr.arpa missing, Leif Johansson
      • Re: in-addr.arpa missing, Joel Jaeggli
      • Re: in-addr.arpa missing, Pekka Savola
    • Re: in-addr.arpa missing, Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: in-addr.arpa missing, Michael Richardson
  • Re: in-addr.arpa missing, Roland Bless
• Response from a former IMPP Chair (Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Response from a former IMPP Chair (Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard), Robert Elz
  • Re: Response from a former IMPP Chair (Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard), Marshall Rose
    • Re: Response from a former IMPP Chair (Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Response from a former IMPP Chair (Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard), Marshall Rose
• re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Keith Moore
  • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, John Stracke
    • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Bill Strahm
      • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Keith Moore
      • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Randy Bush
    • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Keith Moore
      • RE: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, bill
      • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Jonathan Hogg
      • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, John Stracke
      • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Keith Moore
      • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Carsten Bormann
    • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Carsten Bormann
      • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Karl Auerbach
    • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Keith Moore
  • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Message not available
    • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Fred Baker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums, Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: The requirements cycle, Hamid Ould-Brahim
• no multicast of IETF plenaries, Keith Moore
  • Re: no multicast of IETF plenaries, Jeffrey I. Schiller
    • Re: no multicast of IETF plenaries, Ross Finlayson
      • Re: no multicast of IETF plenaries, George Michaelson
  • Re: no multicast of IETF plenaries, Joel Jaeggli
• Nomcom Result, Phil Roberts
• Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Mark Handley
  • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, itojun
    • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Pekka Savola
  • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Randy Bush
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Kevin C. Almeroth
    • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Randy Bush
      • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Keith Moore
      • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Keith Moore
      • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Keith Moore
      • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, John Stracke
      • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Randy Bush
      • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Keith Moore
      • Re: Multicast Last Mile BOF report, Randy Bush
• New Internet AD, Phil Roberts
• Innovations in protocols, Dan Kolis
  • Re: Innovations in protocols, Michael Richardson
  • Re: Innovations in protocols, incomin
• That's *really* new!, Dan Kolis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: That's *really* new!, Valdis . Kletnieks
• text conferencing at ietf57, Marshall Rose
  • Re: text conferencing at ietf57, Michael Richardson
• IETF PGP Key Signing Party - RESCHEDULED, Jeffrey Hutzelman
  • Re: IETF PGP Key Signing Party - RESCHEDULED, Ulrich Kiermayr
    • Re: IETF PGP Key Signing Party - RESCHEDULED, Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Kill 6to4/site-locals from the IETF57 WLAN please., Pekka Savola
• ssl jabber?, Leif Johansson
  • Re: ssl jabber?, Peter Saint-Andre
    • IETF jabber howto pointers please?, George Michaelson
      • Re: IETF jabber howto pointers please?, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: IETF jabber howto pointers please?, Alan Barrett
      • Re: IETF jabber howto pointers please?, Peter Saint-Andre
      • Re: IETF jabber howto pointers please?, Marshall Rose
      • jabber at ietf57, Marshall Rose
• Feasibility of 4G systems, NM Research
• Re: The requirements cycle (Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual....), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: The requirements cycle (Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual....), Dave Crocker
• draft-morris-policy-considerations-00.txt, John Morris
• Vienna Social event (sorry for bothering such a wide audience), David R. Oran
• IETF57 Wien WLAN readiness?, Pekka Savola
  • Re: IETF57 Wien WLAN readiness?, Stephen Casner
  • Re: IETF57 Wien WLAN readiness?, Kurt D. Zeilenga
  • Re: IETF57 Wien WLAN readiness?, Pekka Savola
• RFP: IPV6 addressable light switches, Simon Spero
• Lawful interception, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Lawful interception, Leslie Daigle
• jabber at Vienna IETF, Ronald van der Pol
• Much Regreted, NM Research
  • Re: Much Regreted, Graham Klyne
    • Re: Much Regreted, NM Research
      • Re: Much Regreted, Valdis . Kletnieks
• IPv6 Dynamic discovery of home agents, Fritz F. Saad
• draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
  • Re: draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement, Cyrus Daboo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement, itojun
• Address Allocation via Symmetric Amplification of Light, NM Research
  • Re: Address Allocation via Symmetric Amplification of Light, C. M. Heard
• [no subject], massaly
• The Future of Quantum Cryptography, NM Research
• basic refs, Pedro Fortuny
  • Re: basic refs, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: basic refs, john . loughney
• First Timers, Rohit Gupta
  • Re: First Timers, Ole J. Jacobsen
    • Re: First Timers, Richard Perlman
      • Re: First Timers, Ulrich Kiermayr
      • Re: First Timers, Richard Shockey
      • Re: First Timers, John Stracke
    • Re: First Timers, Dominic Pinto
  • Re: First Timers, Scott W Brim
    • Re: First Timers, Simon Spero
      • Re: First Timers, shogunx
      • RE: First Timers, Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\)
      • RE: First Timers, shogunx
      • Re: First Timers, Michael Koehler
  • Re: First Timers, shogunx
  • Re: First Timers, Randy Bush
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: First Timers, Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: First Timers, Johnny Eriksson
    • Re: First Timers, Dominic Pinto
  • Re: Re: First Timers, Rohit Gupta
  • Re: First Timers, Clint Chaplin
  • Re: First Timers, Ole J. Jacobsen
• IESG on WG review for L2VPN and L3VPN, Alex Zinin
• Re: Movie, Klensin
• the end-to-end name problem, S Woodside
  • Re: the end-to-end name problem, Keith Moore
    • Re: the end-to-end name problem, Einar Stefferud
      • Re: the end-to-end name problem, S Woodside
  • Re: the end-to-end name problem, Zefram
    • Re: the end-to-end name problem, S Woodside
  • Re: the end-to-end name problem, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: the end-to-end name problem, S Woodside
      • Re: the end-to-end name problem, grenville armitage
  • Re: the end-to-end name problem, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: the end-to-end name problem, grenville armitage
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: the end-to-end name problem, J. Noel Chiappa
• Where can I find capwap BOF Agenda ?, Soohong Daniel Park
  • Re: Where can I find capwap BOF Agenda ?, Andy Bierman
• about the internet-drafts submission, chuyonggang
• Seeking feedback on I-D discussing "public policy considerations", John Morris
• A Quantum Cryptography ( QC ) Critique, NM Research
  • Re: A Quantum Cryptography ( QC ) Critique, Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: A Quantum Cryptography ( QC ) Critique, NM Research
• what's a PWG?, Aaron Falk
  • RE: what's a PWG?, bill
  • Re: what's a PWG?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Re: what's a PWG?, Aaron Falk
• IAB open architecture meeting in Vienna, Leslie Daigle
• Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard, hardie
    • Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard, Vernon Schryver
    • Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard, Marshall Rose
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
• concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Paul Vixie
  • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Zefram
    • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Paul Vixie
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Zefram
    • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Zefram
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, niket
  • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson
    • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, hardie
    • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Paul Vixie
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Paul Vixie
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Zefram
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Zefram
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Paul Vixie
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Paul Vixie
      • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Higgs
• microsoft nat comment, S Woodside
• Re: 57th IETF - Social Event, itojun
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: 57th IETF - Social Event, Kozdon, Peter
• RE: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP ), Michel Py
  • Re: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP ), Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP ), Michel Py
• UPNP was:RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py
  • Re: UPNP was:RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), John Stracke
    • Re: UPNP was:RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore
      • Re: UPNP was:RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), John Stracke
      • SRV (was Re: UPNP was :RE: myth ...), Keith Moore
  • stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP ), Keith Moore
• Re AXFR clarify to Draft standard, Dean Anderson
• axfr-clarify, again, D. J. Bernstein
• non-complain mail system at alcatel.com, Michael Richardson
  • Re: non-complain mail system at alcatel.com, vinton g. cerf
    • Re: non-complain mail system at alcatel.com, Dave Crocker
    • Re: non-complain mail system at alcatel.com, Paul Vixie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: non-complain mail system at alcatel.com, Bob Braden
    • Re: non-complain mail system at alcatel.com, Simon Leinen
• UWB - Ultra Wide Band - still experimental, Joe Baptista
• Checking if signed mail works now, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• replacing NAPT, S Woodside
• Re: Last Call: SDP attribute for qualifying Media Formats with Generic Parameters to a Proposed Standard, ned . freed
  • Re: Last Call: SDP attribute for qualifying Media Formats with Generic Parameters to a Proposed Standard, Colin Perkins
• COACHES bof announcement, John Loughney
• RE: primary purpose of firewalls, Michel Py
  • Re: primary purpose of firewalls, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: primary purpose of firewalls, Michel Py
    • Re: primary purpose of firewalls, Keith Moore
      • Re: primary purpose of firewalls, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: primary purpose of firewalls, David Morris
      • Re: primary purpose of firewalls, S Woodside
      • Re: primary purpose of firewalls, David Morris
      • Re: primary purpose of firewalls, Keith Moore
  • RE: primary purpose of firewalls, Michel Py
  • RE: primary purpose of firewalls, Michel Py
• Re: myth of the great transition, J. Noel Chiappa
  • Re: myth of the great transition, S Woodside
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: myth of the great transition, Michel Py
  • Fwd: myth of the great transition, S Woodside
• use of (the term) NAT considered dangerous, S Woodside
• RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Christian Huitema
• Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), John Loughney
  • ISPs giving users NATted addresses (was myth of the great transition), Keith Moore
  • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla
• RE: NATs are NOT Firewalls, Michel Py
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: NATs are NOT Firewalls, Michel Py
    • RE: NATs are NOT Firewalls, shogunx
• test mail, Soohong Daniel Park
• Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Bob Braden
  • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore
    • Re: myth of the great transition, S Woodside
      • Re: myth of the great transition, Keith Moore
      • Re: myth of the great transition, Peter Deutsch
      • firewall logic (was Re: myth of the great transition), Keith Moore
  • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michael Thomas
      • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Paul Vixie
      • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Richard Shockey
      • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Paul Vixie
      • Re: myth of the great transition, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: myth of the great transition, Paul Vixie
      • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Richard Shockey
      • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Paul Vixie
  • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michael Thomas
  • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Einar Stefferud
    • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department, Paul Vixie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore