IETF Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: A simple question, (continued)
  • Re: A simple question, Bob Braden
    • Re: A simple question, Peter Deutsch
  • Re: A simple question, Joe Abley
    • Re: A simple question, S Woodside
  • RE: A simple question, john . loughney
    • Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk
• Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Russ Allbery
  • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Joe Abley
  • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Spencer Dawkins
    • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Lloyd Wood
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John C Klensin
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John C Klensin
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Ole J. Jacobsen
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John Morris
      • Message not available
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John Morris
      • Message not available
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Dave Aronson
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Ross Finlayson
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Joe Abley
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Bill Manning
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Joe Abley
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John C Klensin
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Scott W Brim
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Donald Eastlake 3rd
  • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, MC
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Jeffrey Race
    • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John Stracke
      • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Valdis . Kletnieks
    • Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Lloyd Wood
• MPLS Support for DiffServ, VILLARREAL, STEVE (SBC-MSI)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: MPLS Support for DiffServ, Shahram Davari
• NOSHADE CLASS, internet-drafts
• RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py
  • Re: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner
    • Re: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Margaret Wasserman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py
    • RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner
  • RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py
    • RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner
  • RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py
    • RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner
  • RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py
    • RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner
  • RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py
    • RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner
• I-D ACTION:draft-iesg-charter-02.txt (fwd), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• BGP Black hole Community, Peering
  • Re: BGP Black hole Community, Dean Anderson
    • Re: BGP Black hole Community, Joe Abley
      • Re: BGP Black hole Community, Peering
      • Re: BGP Black hole Community, Joe Abley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: BGP Black hole Community, Rasheeduddin, Tariq
    • Re: BGP Black hole Community, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: BGP Black hole Community, John Stracke
      • Re: BGP Black hole Community, Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: BGP Black hole Community, Peering
  • Re: BGP Black hole Community, Peering
• A plea for calm, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: A plea for calm, Carsten Bormann
    • A modertor for the IETF list? (Re: A plea for calm), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: A modertor for the IETF list? (Re: A plea for calm), Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: A modertor for the IETF list? (Re: A plea for calm), Carsten Bormann
    • Re: A plea for calm, Dean Anderson
      • Re: Chastisement (A plea for calm), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Chastisement (A plea for calm), Dean Anderson
      • Re: Chastisement (A plea for calm), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Chastisement (A plea for calm), Dean Anderson
      • Re: Chastisement (A plea for calm), Dean Anderson
      • Re: Chastisement (A plea for calm), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Re: A plea for calm, Dave Crocker
• RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses, J. Noel Chiappa
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Fleischman, Eric
    • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Eliot Lear
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore
  • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, John Stracke
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Rob Austein
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore
  • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore
      • addresses in referrals (Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: addresses in referrals (Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses), Keith Moore
• draft-rmcgowan-unicode-procs-02.txt, Simon Josefsson
• RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Michel Py
• Hello,ietf,japanese girl VS playboy, internet-drafts
• RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Margaret Wasserman
  • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain
    • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Eliot Lear
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Måns Nilsson
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Matt Crawford
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Matt Crawford
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke
    • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Margaret Wasserman
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Matt Crawford
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Valdis . Kletnieks
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Bill Manning
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Michael Richardson
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Spencer Dawkins
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Daniel Senie
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Margaret Wasserman
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Pekka Savola
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Bill Manning
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Randy Bush
      • Thinking differently about names and addresses, Dave Crocker
      • RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Tony Hain
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Dave Crocker
      • site locals are bankrupt, Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, John C Klensin
      • RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Tony Hain
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Dave Crocker
      • RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Tony Hain
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), S Woodside
    • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
    • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Michel Py
• ignorant applications (and transport, and...), Dave Crocker
• Exit the tutorial, press, agenda
• RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Michel Py
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Christian Huitema
    • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
    • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Valdis . Kletnieks
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
    • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Vernon Schryver
  • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
  • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Brian Zill
    • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Fredrik Nyman
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke
      • v6 support (was Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))), Keith Moore
      • Re: v6 support (was Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))), Steven M. Bellovin
      • Re: v6 support (was Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))), Eric Rosen
• RE: Doing "real" work, Michel Py
  • Re: Doing "real" work, Valdis . Kletnieks
  • Re: Doing "real" work, Richard Perlman
• Suspension of posting privilleges for Jim Fleming, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• RE: "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing the ir employers..." ?, VILLARREAL, STEVE (SBC-MSI)
• FW: [ga] ITU-T Workshops on E-Health, E-Government, and Next Gene ration Ne tworks, Gordon . Lennox
• RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Christian Huitema
  • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tim Chown
    • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Matt Crawford
      • Re: site local addresses, Ole Troan
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tim Chown
    • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain
• U.S. DOD to Select the French GSM over CDMA ?, Jim Fleming
• "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing their employers..." ?, Jim Fleming
  • Re: "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing their employers..." ?, gratta
    • Re: "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing their employers..." ?, Jim Fleming
  • RE: "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing their employers..." ?, Steve Silverman
  • Re: "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing their employers..." ?, Michael Hammer
• RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Michel Py
  • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie
    • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), David Conrad
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), David Conrad
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Daniel Senie
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Andrew Newton
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Christian Huitema
    • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Matt Crawford
      • "...handwaving arguments that "something bad might happen"..." ?, Jim Fleming
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Margaret Wasserman
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Margaret Wasserman
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Margaret Wasserman
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), David R. Oran
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Bill Manning
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Bill Manning
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Margaret Wasserman
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Bill Manning
      • RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin
      • Re: Thinking differently, Bill Manning
      • Re: Thinking differently, Jaap Akkerhuis
      • Re: Thinking differently, Bill Manning
      • Re: Thinking differently, Randy Bush
      • Evolution in action (Re: Thinking differently), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Evolution in action (Re: Thinking differently), Pekka Savola
      • Re: Evolution in action (Re: Thinking differently), John C Klensin
      • Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Eric A. Hall
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Charles E. Perkins
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tim Chown
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Matt Crawford
  • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Christian Huitema
  • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Michel Py
    • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Eliot Lear
  • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Michel Py
    • Doing "real" work, Charles E. Perkins
• Early versions of RFC 2298, Kamal Jamali
  • Re: Early versions of RFC 2298, Tim Chown
• IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), S Woodside
  • Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), John Stracke
    • Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), S Woodside
      • Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), John Stracke
      • Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), shogunx
    • Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), John Stracke
      • Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), S Woodside
  • Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), Fred Baker
    • Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), John Stracke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), S Woodside
• RE: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Shahram Davari
  • Re: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Alex Zinin
    • Re: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Alex Zinin
• Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6. (fwd), Dean Anderson
  • Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6. (fwd), Jaap Akkerhuis
    • Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6. (fwd), Dean Anderson
      • Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6. (fwd), Rob Austein
      • please change the subject line, George Michaelson
    • Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6. (fwd), Lloyd Wood
• Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jim Fleming
  • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Peter O'Neil
    • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jim Fleming
    • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Lloyd Wood
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Keith Moore
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Eliot Lear
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jeroen Massar
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Fred Baker
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Pekka Savola
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Pekka Savola
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Keith Moore
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Lloyd Wood
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Paul Vixie
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jeroen Massar
      • site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Michael Mealling
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), John C Klensin
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Margaret Wasserman
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), John Kristoff
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), John Stracke
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), John Stracke
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Andrew Newton
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Louis A. Mamakos
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Lloyd Wood
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: site local addresses, Simon Leinen
      • RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Paul Hoffman / VPNC
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie
      • Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Keith Moore
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Margaret Wasserman
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Eliot Lear
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Eliot Lear
      • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Richard Carlson
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Keith Moore
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Richard Carlson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Michel Py
    • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jeroen Massar
  • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Michel Py
  • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Fred Baker
    • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tim Chown
    • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Måns Nilsson
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Pekka Savola
      • Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Måns Nilsson
  • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Michel Py
    • RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., shogunx
• "The RIRs do not charge for Internet Number Resources.", Jim Fleming
• RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Scott Petrack
  • RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jim Fleming
• RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SI P for conference calls, Orit Levin
• The AM Internet or the FM InterNAT ?, Jim Fleming
• Three I* society Registries...and Three New Toy (Proof of Concept) TLDs ?, Jim Fleming
• Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Richard Shockey
  • Re: Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Jim Fleming
  • RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Henry Sinnreich
    • RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Jiri Kuthan
      • RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Dan Freedman
      • NAT traversal....????....Re: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Jim Fleming
      • RE: NAT traversal....????....Re: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Dan Freedman
      • Re: NAT traversal....????....Re: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, S Woodside
  • Re: Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Christopher Allen
    • Re: Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Bill Woodcock
  • Re: Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, RL 'Bob' Morgan
  • Re: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Henry Sinnreich
• Happy Lady Day, anthony
• Deleting from this mailing list, Mounir Benzaid
• Pls. delete me from this list, Devendra_Vyas
• A very nice game, BeardC
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A very nice game, internet-drafts
• Re: [PubSoft] Anti War Page (fwd), shogunx
• BEST Best Practices of the IETF, Christopher Allen
• IETF Patent Licenses are RAND (fwd), Joe Baptista
  • Re: IETF Patent Licenses are RAND (fwd), Scott W Brim
• How to get more reviewers for documents, aki . niemi
  • RE: How to get more reviewers for documents, Nikhil Mittal
    • Re: How to get more reviewers for documents, David J. Aronson
  • RE: How to get more reviewers for documents, Vach Kompella
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: How to get more reviewers for documents, aki . niemi
  • RE: How to get more reviewers for documents, aki . niemi
• charging for IETF participation, Dave Crocker
  • Re: charging for IETF participation, Pekka Savola
    • Re: charging for IETF participation, Dave Crocker
  • Re: charging for IETF participation, John Stracke
    • Re: charging for IETF participation, Rajesh Talpade
  • Re: charging for IETF participation, David J. Aronson
    • Re: charging for IETF participation, Daniel Senie
  • Re: charging for IETF participation, David Terrell
• Lost, USB adapter., Måns Nilsson
• Found: AC adapter, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
• 38 IETFs ago, RL 'Bob' Morgan
• Lost Laptop Battery, Ben Campbell
• Tutorials, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Barrel-bottom scraping, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Pekka Savola
    • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Scott W Brim
      • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Peter Deutsch
      • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Scott W Brim
      • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Tim Chown
      • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, John A. Loughney
      • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Randy Bush
      • Tutorials, Charlie Perkins
      • Re: Tutorials, Randy Bush
      • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Pekka Savola
      • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: Training et.al., Bill Manning
      • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, grenville armitage
      • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC)
    • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Michael Richardson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Barrel-bottom scraping, Franck Martin
• Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Spencer Dawkins
  • Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Pekka Savola
  • Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Michael Hammer
    • Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., John Stracke
    • Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Fred Baker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., aki . niemi
    • Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Tim Chown
      • Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Dave Crocker
• slide fonts, Perry E. Metzger
  • Re: slide fonts, Dave Crocker
    • Re: slide fonts, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: slide fonts, Scott W Brim
      • Re: slide fonts, John Stracke
      • Re: slide fonts, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: slide fonts, Donald Eastlake 3rd
      • Re: slide fonts, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• OCSP/CA, abdo-lkarim.el-ouassaidi at ensimag.imag.fr
• On IETF Funding, Daniel Pelstring
• Chest congestion, Tony Hain
  • Re: Chest congestion, vinton g. cerf
    • Update - was RE: Chest congestion, Tony Hain
• IETF56 Network Status - 2003-03-18 17:30 PST, Brett Thorson
• Spring 2004 IETF, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Spring 2004 IETF, Lipford, Mark A [PCS]
• TONIGHT: Project JXTA Engineering Meeting - Continental 8/9 - 7pm PST, Jeffrey Altman
• Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Margaret Wasserman
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Aaron Falk
    • Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Randy Bush
    • Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Spencer Dawkins
      • Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, David J. Aronson
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Bob Hinden
    • Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Randy Bush
      • Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Bob Hinden
      • Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • Publishing the budget (Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Publishing the budget (Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday), Lynn St.Amour
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John Stracke
    • Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Scott W Brim
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Michel Py
• IETF56 Network Status 2003-03-18 01:10, Brett Thorson
• Printing at IETF 56, Stuart Cheshire
  • Re: Printing at IETF 56, Joel Jaeggli
• DHCP Problems, Brett Thorson
• Re: rfc-ed reference style [Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP], Dr. Jeffrey Race
  • Re: rfc-ed reference style [Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP], Ole J. Jacobsen
    • Re: rfc-ed reference style [Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP], Lloyd Wood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: rfc-ed reference style [Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP], Bob Braden
• jabber note-takers, Leif Johansson
  • Re: jabber note-takers, Marshall Rose
    • Re: jabber note-takers, Leif Johansson
• Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco (fwd), Jiri Kuthan
  • Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco (fwd), Marshall Rose
• IETF56 Network Status - 2003-03-16 21:30, Brett Thorson
• New S.F. Asian Museum, Dave Crocker
• weird (broken?) IPv6 routing, Aaron Falk
  • Re: weird (broken?) IPv6 routing, Aaron Falk
    • Re: weird (broken?) IPv6 routing, Lloyd Wood
• Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Michael Richardson
  • Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Marshall Rose
    • Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Michael Richardson
      • Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Marshall Rose
    • Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Aaron Falk
      • Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Marshall Rose
      • Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Marshall Rose
• mac having trouble with DHCP, Perry E. Metzger
• RE: Why not a ".IETF" TLD? (was: Re: Financial state of the IETF. ..), Franck Martin
• reverse, Randy Bush