Internationalized eMail Address Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Mar 09 2011

[EAI] FYI: I-D Action:draft-duerst-eai-mailto-00.txt, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-08.txt, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] message/global, was I-D Action, John Levine
Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-08.txt, Charles Lindsey
[EAI] FYI: I-D Action:draft-duerst-eai-mailto-00.txt, "Martin J. DÃrst"

Mar 08 2011

Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-08.txt, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-08.txt, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-08.txt, John Levine

Mar 07 2011

[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-08.txt, Internet-Drafts

Feb 28 2011

Feb 25 2011

[EAI] Meeting in Prague, Joseph Yee

Feb 20 2011

Re: [EAI] consensus text and parameter of MAIL FROM, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] POLL: Is the new text in Abstract section in RFC5335bis good to replace the original?, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] [eai] rfc5335bis #10 (new): POLL: new text to insert as subsection (1.x) under section Introduction, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] consensus text and parameter of MAIL FROM, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] [eai] rfc5335bis #9 (new): POLL: new text in Introduction in RFC5335bis to replace the original, ned+ima

Feb 18 2011

Re: [EAI] POLL: Is the new text in Abstract section in RFC5335bis good to replace the original?, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [EAI] #10 - new text to insert as subsection (1.x) under section Introduction, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] #9 new text in Introduction of 5335bis, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] #8 New text in Abstract, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] POLL: Is the new text in Abstract section in RFC5335bis good to replace the original?, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] POLL: Is the new text in Abstract section in RFC5335bis good to replace the original?, ned+ima
[EAI] POLL: Is the new text good to insert as subsection (1.1) under the Introduction section, replacing section 1.2 under version 07 and section 1.1 under version 08 of RFC5335bis, Joseph Yee
[EAI] POLL: Is the new text in Introduction section in RFC5335bis good to replace the original?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] POLL: Is the new text in Abstract section in RFC5335bis good to replace the original?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] [eai] rfc5335bis #10 (new): POLL: new text to insert as subsection (1.x) under section Introduction, eai issue tracker
Re: [EAI] [eai] rfc5335bis #8 (new): POLL: new text in Abstract section in RFC5335bis to replace the original, eai issue tracker
[EAI] [eai] rfc5335bis #9 (new): POLL: new text in Introduction in RFC5335bis to replace the original, eai issue tracker
[EAI] [eai] rfc5335bis #8 (new): POLL: new text in Abstract section in RFC5335bis to replace the original, eai issue tracker
Re: [EAI] RFC5335bis review and poll, Jiankang YAO

Feb 17 2011

[EAI] RFC5335bis review and poll, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] [eai] rfc5336bis #5 (closed): consensus question: keep nested encodings for message/global?, eai issue tracker
Re: [EAI] [eai] rfc5336bis #3 (closed): consensus question: remove repetition of normative text?, eai issue tracker

Feb 16 2011

Re: [EAI] consensus text and parameter of MAIL FROM, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] consensus text and parameter of MAIL FROM, Charles Lindsey
[EAI] EAI session request for Prague meeting, Joseph Yee
[EAI] consensus text and parameter of MAIL FROM, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #3 - remove repetition of normative text?, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #5 - Keep nested encodings for message/global?, Joseph Yee

Feb 14 2011

Re: [EAI] is it time for chairs to give a conclusion for Issue #1 ?, Troy Starr
[EAI] is it time for chairs to give a conclusion for Issue #1 ?, Jiankang YAO

Feb 13 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, ned+ima

Feb 11 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Charles Lindsey

Feb 09 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Jason Nelson
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Dave CROCKER

Feb 08 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Shawn Steele

Feb 06 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Dave CROCKER

Feb 05 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Claudio Allocchio

Feb 04 2011

[EAI] OOF for a 10 days, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #4 - new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"? -- update, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #2 - new parameter to VRFY/EXPNonly after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] Should/may, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Should/may, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Should/may, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Should/may, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Should/may, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, ned+ima

Feb 03 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Should/may, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [EAI] IMA Digest, Vol 67, Issue 3, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Getting done quick, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Should/may, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Bill McQuillan
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Yao Jiankang
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Troy Starr
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John Levine

Feb 02 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #4 - new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"?, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #4 - new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] SMTP replies containing non-ASCII text (was: Re: Consensus result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM), John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, John C Klensin
[EAI] SMTP replies containing non-ASCII text (was: Re: Consensus result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM), John C Klensin

Jan 31 2011

Re: [EAI] Parameter(s) on MAIL options, John R Levine
Re: [EAI] Parameter(s) on MAIL options, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Parameter(s) on MAIL options, John R Levine
Re: [EAI] Parameter(s) on MAIL options, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAI LFROM, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Parameter(s) on MAIL options, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Parameter(s) on MAIL options, John Levine

Jan 31 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Troy Starr
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, E-mail Address Internationalization
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #4 - new reference and term, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #2 - new parameter to VRFY/EXPNonly after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Shawn Steele

Jan 30 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #5 - Keep nested encodings for message/global?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #4 - new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"?, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Gatewaying and Legacy support within EAI, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Bill McQuillan
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Jiankang YAO
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, John Levine

Jan 29 2011

Re: [EAI] Gatewaying and Legacy support within EAI, John R Levine
[EAI] Gatewaying and Legacy support within EAI, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Jiankang YAO
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #2 - new parameter to VRFY/EXPNonly after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, Jiankang YAO

Jan 28 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #3 - remove repetition of normative text?, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #5 - Keep nested encodings for message/global?, Dave CROCKER
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #3 - remove repetition of normative text?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #5 - Keep nested encodings for message/global?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #2 - new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #6 - Current metalanguage model acceptable? And Dave Crocker's proposal, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #7 - change definition of uAtom?, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] RFC5336bis (was Re: Proposal for Alternate ABNF), Jiankang YAO

Jan 26 2011

[EAI] RFC5336bis (was Re: Proposal for Alternate ABNF), Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), Jiankang YAO
Re: [EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-08.txt, Abel

Jan 25 2011

Re: [EAI] The -08 draft, John C Klensin
[EAI] The -08 draft, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-08.txt, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-08.txt, Alexey Melnikov
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-08.txt, Internet-Drafts

Jan 24 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John R Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, fujiwara
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), Shawn Steele

Jan 23 2011

[EAI] ABNF for IDN in EAI, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF, ned+ima

Jan 22 2011

Re: [EAI] an helminthine cafeteria, was Proposal for Alternate ABNF, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #3: remove repetition of normative text?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #7: change definition of uAtom?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #3: remove repetition of normative text?, John C Klensin

Jan 21 2011

Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Why the transition will be pretty fast in some places., John C Klensin
[EAI] Why the transition will be pretty fast in some places., Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #???: Media types that support multiple charsets SHOULD employ utf-8, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #???: Media types that support multiple charsets SHOULD employ utf-8, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #3: remove repetition of normative text?, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, ned+ima
[EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?), Dave CROCKER

Jan 20 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #4: new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #5: keep nested encodings for message/global?, Tony Hansen
Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #5: keep nested encodings for message/global?, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #4: new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"?, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #3: remove repetition of normative text?, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #???: Media types that support multiple charsets SHOULD employ utf-8, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, "Martin J. DÃrst"
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #???: Media types that support multiple charsets SHOULD employ utf-8, Shawn Steele

Jan 19 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, ned+ima
[EAI] Extensions to EAI (was: Re: Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Bill McQuillan
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #4: new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"?, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, ned+ima

Jan 18 2011

Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Bill McQuillan
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Troy Starr
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John R Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Bill McQuillan
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #5: keep nested encodings for message/global?, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #5: keep nested encodings for message/global?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Bill McQuillan
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, Troy Starr
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Troy Starr
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #5: keep nested encodings for message/global?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #7: change definition of uAtom?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #4: new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #3: remove repetition of normative text?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] parameter on MAIL FROM, Shawn Steele

Jan 17 2011

[EAI] Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #5: keep nested encodings for message/global?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #7: change definition of uAtom?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #4: new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #3: remove repetition of normative text?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] RFC publication numbers and titles, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] RFC publication numbers and titles, Bill McQuillan

Jan 16 2011

Re: [EAI] RFC publication numbers and titles, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] RFC publication numbers and titles, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] RFC publication numbers and titles, Alexey Melnikov

Jan 14 2011

[EAI] return A-label?, Jiankang YAO
[EAI] consensus questions, Joseph Yee

Jan 13 2011

Re: [EAI] UTF8REPLY, Shawn Steele
[EAI] "Latin" (was: Re: UTF8REPLY), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] UTF8REPLY, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] UTF8REPLY, John Levine
Re: [EAI] UTF8REPLY, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] UTF8REPLY, John C Klensin
[EAI] RFC publication numbers and titles, Ernie Dainow

Jan 12 2011

Re: [EAI] UTF8REPLY, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] UTF8REPLY, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] new question to the question list Re: syntax: uAtom, Jiankang YAO

Jan 11 2011

Re: [EAI] UTF8REPLY, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] UTF8REPLY, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] UTF8REPLY, ned+ima
[EAI] UTF8REPLY, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] new question to the question list Re: syntax: uAtom, "Martin J. Dürst"
[EAI] new question to the question list Re: syntax: uAtom, Jiankang YAO
Re: [EAI] syntax: uAtom, John C Klensin
[EAI] vrfy syntax, Jiankang YAO

Jan 09 2011

[EAI] syntax: uAtom, Jiankang YAO
Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, Jiankang YAO
Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, Barry Leiba

Jan 09 2011

Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] utf8 reply in RCPT Commands, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, John Levine
Re: [EAI] utf8 reply in RCPT Commands, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] utf8 reply in RCPT Commands, John C Klensin

Jan 08 2011

Re: [EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] utf8 reply in RCPT Commands, Dave CROCKER

Jan 07 2011

Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Barry Leiba
[EAI] utf8 reply in RCPT Commands, Jiankang YAO

Jan 05 2011

[EAI] determining the question set for consensus call, Joseph Yee
[EAI] MAY transmit mailbox names, Jiankang YAO
[EAI] Consensus-determining procedures, John C Klensin

Jan 05 2011

Re: [EAI] non-EAI messages, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Charles Lindsey

Jan 04 2011

Re: [EAI] Random thought on ASCII range, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Random thought on ASCII range, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Random thought on ASCII range, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Random thought on ASCII range, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Random thought on ASCII range, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Random thought on ASCII range, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] "non-ascii", John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] "non-ascii", Yangwoo Ko
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] "non-ascii", John C Klensin

Jan 03 2011

[EAI] "non-ascii", Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Random thought on ASCII range, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] non-EAI messages, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] non-EAI messages, Bill McQuillan
Re: [EAI] non-EAI messages, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] non-EAI messages, John Levine
Re: [EAI] Random thought on ASCII range, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Repeating normative text from other specifications, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] non-EAI messages, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Random thought on ASCII range, Yangwoo Ko

Dec 31 2010

Re: [EAI] non-EAI messages, Troy Starr
Re: [EAI] Repeating normative text from other specifications, Shawn Steele
[EAI] Random thought on ASCII range, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] non-EAI messages, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: Parameter on MAIL command, Yangwoo Ko
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Yangwoo Ko
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Dave CROCKER

Dec 30 2010

Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: Parameter on MAIL command, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Repeating normative text from other specifications, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Joseph Yee
[EAI] Repeating normative text from other specifications, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, John R Levine
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: Parameter on MAIL command, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Yangwoo Ko
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: Parameter on MAIL command, Yangwoo Ko

Dec 29 2010

Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] [apps-discuss] RFC5336 and VRFY/EXPN (was: Re: apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Parameter on MAIL command, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] ascii nomenclature, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, John R Levine
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, John Levine
Re: [EAI] [apps-discuss] RFC5336 and VRFY/EXPN (was: Re: apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis), Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: Parameter on MAIL command, Troy Starr
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, John C Klensin
[EAI] new terms Re: Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Jiankang YAO
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, Yangwoo Ko
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Yangwoo Ko
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: Parameter on MAIL command, Yangwoo Ko
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: Parameter on MAIL command, Jiankang YAO
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Barry Leiba
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, ned+ima

Dec 28 2010

Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, ned+ima
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: Parameter on MAIL command, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [EAI] RFC5336 and VRFY/EXPN, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [EAI] [apps-discuss] RFC5336 and VRFY/EXPN (was: Re: apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] [apps-discuss] RFC5336 and VRFY/EXPN (was: Re: apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis), Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Yangwoo Ko
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, John C Klensin
[EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation, Dave CROCKER
[EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN, John C Klensin
[EAI] EAI review topic: Parameter on MAIL command, John C Klensin

Dec 27 2010

Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Barry Leiba
Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Dave CROCKER
[EAI] WG status, next steps, and the long "review" note, John C Klensin
[EAI] Analysis of comments on 5336bis (was: Re: apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] [apps-discuss] RFC5336 and VRFY/EXPN (was: Re: apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] [apps-discuss] RFC5336 and VRFY/EXPN (was: Re: apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis), Al Costanzo
Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?, John R Levine

Dec 26 2010

Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?, John C Klensin

Dec 25 2010

[EAI] RFC5336 and VRFY/EXPN (was: Re: apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis), John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] 5336bis, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] 5336bis, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] 5336bis, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?, John R Levine
Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?, John C Klensin

Dec 24 2010

Re: [EAI] Seasons' Greetings!, Daniel Taharlev
[EAI] Seasons' Greetings!, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?, John R Levine
Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?, John Levine
[EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Ned Freed

Dec 23 2010

Re: [EAI] draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt, Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Charles Lindsey
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Ned Freed
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Ned Freed
Re: [EAI] draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt, Dave CROCKER

Dec 22 2010

Re: [EAI] Co-chair's comments on state of the documents and the WG, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Co-chair's comments on state of the documents and the WG, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] [apps-discuss] (private) draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt (v3), Dave CROCKER
[EAI] (private) draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt (v3), Dave CROCKER
[EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis, Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] Co-chair's comments on state of the documents and the WG, "Martin J. Dürst"
[EAI] Co-chair's comments on state of the documents and the WG, John C Klensin

Dec 16 2010

[EAI] [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-eai-rfc5337bis-dsn-01.txt, Shawn Steele
[EAI] Fw: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-eai-rfc5337bis-dsn-01.txt, Jiankang YAO

Dec 12 2010

[EAI] FW:Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5337bis-dsn-1, Jiankang YAO

Dec 07 2010

[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
[EAI] Fw: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5337bis-dsn-1, Jiankang YAO
[EAI] review of rfc5335bis-06, Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] review of rfc5335bis-05.txt, Jiankang YAO

Dec 06 2010

Re: [EAI] review of rfc5335bis-05.txt, Shawn Steele
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-06.txt, Internet-Drafts

Dec 04 2010

Re: [EAI] My happiness with current drafts., Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] 5336bis, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] review of rfc5335bis-05.txt, Alexey Melnikov
[EAI] review of rfc5335bis-05.txt, YAO Jiankang
Re: [EAI] My happiness with current drafts., John C Klensin
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [EAI] draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-05.txt, Jiankang YAO
Re: [EAI] 5336bis, Jiankang YAO
Re: [EAI] draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-05.txt, Tony Hansen

Dec 03 2010

[EAI] My happiness with current drafts., Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] 5336bis, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] 2 remaining issues with draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-05.txt ABNF, John C Klensin
[EAI] 5336bis, Shawn Steele
[EAI] 2 remaining issues with draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-05.txt ABNF, Alexey Melnikov
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
[EAI] Comments on the latest ABNF in draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-04.txt, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [EAI] draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-05.txt, Jiankang YAO
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-06.txt, Internet-Drafts

Dec 02 2010

[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
[EAI] draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-05.txt, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [EAI] with protocol types Re: AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt, Alexey Melnikov
[EAI] with protocol types Re: AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt, Jiankang YAO
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-05.txt, Internet-Drafts

Nov 30 2010

Re: [EAI] AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt, Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt, John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] WG Co-chair review of 5335bis (headers extension), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [EAI] WG Co-chair review of 5335bis (headers extension), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [EAI] AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt, Shawn Steele
[EAI] WG Co-chair review of 5335bis (headers extension), John C Klensin

Nov 29 2010

Re: [EAI] WG Co-chair review of 5336bis (SMTP extension), Joseph Yee

Mail converted by MHonArc