[EAI] Re: draft-hurtta-eai-messagestore-00.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[EAI] Re: draft-hurtta-eai-messagestore-00.txt
Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> writes
in gmane.ietf.ima:
> Kari Hurtta wrote:
>
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hurtta-eai-messagestore-00.txt
>
> Some quick notes from reading it once:
>
> | (g) WWW browser access mail server with HTTP [RFC2616].
>
> I think you can resolve (2g) by a note stating that Web mail
> is typically based on IMAP or POP3, and therefore covered by
> your (2e) or (2f). If that's true, my POV is limited to a
> few ISPs and my guesses what they might do, behind what I see.
Adding note seems guite good idea.
That is not however universal truth :-)
For good measurement I disabled POP and IMAP
listeners on testing server. WWW interface
still works :-)
hurtta at leija:~$ telnet testiXXXX.fmi.fi 110
Trying 193.166.XXX.XXX...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
hurtta at leija:~$ telnet testiXXXX.fmi.fi 143
Trying 193.166.XXX.XXX...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
hurtta at leija:~$
That is Communigate Pro.
( Communigate Pro is quite strange product.
All listeners seems just to be one process.
Whole server is one process ( SMTP, HTTP, IMAP,
POP, SIP, Radius, LDAP and whatever)
there is is just big number of threads ...
)
Also if I read documentation of Courier-MTA correctly,
it's webinterface read directly Maildirs -- it is not
using IMAP ( http://www.courier-mta.org/sqwebmail/ )
/ Kari Hurtta
_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.