[EAI] Re: MTA -> Final delievery MTA -> MDA (Re: MIME questions)

[Kari Hurtta <hurtta+gmane at siilo.fmi.fi>]

John C Klensin <klensin at jck.com> writes in gmane.ietf.ima:

> > F -> D      is LMTP

> >      F -> D        Your case #XCVXBX is closed.
> >      F -> D        .                  
> >      F <- D        250 Message parsed, UTF8SMTP detected
> >      F <- D        250 <client at example.com> sttored
> >      F <- D        XYZ <boss at example.com> UTF8SMTP not accepted
> 
> Note, fwiw, that the last three lines above violate 2821 (first
> two lines must have continuation markers, at least) and that,
> unless things have changed recently, many MTAs will assume that
> the  return codes on all members of a continuation set will be
> the same.
> 
>       john

You missed that this part is LMTP.   

It can not violate RFC 2821, because this is not SMTP :-)


Hovever, on that picture there was violation of RFC 2033. 
It should be

> >      F -> D        Your case #XCVXBX is closed.
> >      F -> D        .                  
> >      F <- D        250 <client at example.com> stored
> >      F <- D        XYZ <boss at example.com> UTF8SMTP not accepted

/ Kari Hurtta


_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima