Re: [EAI] How to prevent up-conversion (Re: Respawn "Messages on original form" (Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-01.txt))
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EAI] How to prevent up-conversion (Re: Respawn "Messages on original form" (Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-01.txt))



Charles Lindsey wrote on 3/27/07 14:49 +0100:
Let us take an example. A message body was in Q-P on the wire. Is the IMAP
implementation entitled to store it in only its decoded (8bit) form?  Suppose
the message was in fact signed by DKIM or PGP-mime (both of which  are
supposed to sign the Q-P form - a bad design decision, but there it  is). The
recipient (or his MUA) finds that the signature is broken. So the  recipient
requests to see the original form of the message so that he can  check for
himself exactly why the signature did not work (maybe some  trailing empty
line had got lost, and by manually restoring it he can make  the signature
work).

Mail gateways in general are not required to preserve signatures beyond a best-effort to preserve multipart/signed content. Final delivery to a mail store that may or may not be native RFC 2822 would count as a gateway.


               - Chris


_______________________________________________ IMA mailing list IMA at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.