[EAI] Re: Ticket status, EAI, June 15, 2007

[Kari Hurtta <hurtta+gmane at siilo.fmi.fi>]

It is still unclear what was destiny of

         ISSUE: UTF8HDR 4.5: <angle-addr> and <addr-spec> on trace field syntax

Was that editoral issue? Or was it minor, non-important issue?

Basically when utf-8 address is allowed on for clause, rfc 2822
syntax needs extending:

  received        =       "Received:" name-val-list ";" date-time CRLF

  name-val-list   =       [CFWS] [name-val-pair *(CFWS name-val-pair)]

  name-val-pair   =       item-name CFWS item-value

  item-name       =       ALPHA *(["-"] (ALPHA / DIGIT))

  item-value      =       1*angle-addr / addr-spec /
                            atom / domain / msg-id


<addr-spec> does not allow utf-8 addresses. So <item-value>
need include <utf8-addr-spec>.

( Another problem is that syntax is changing. So change need to be tracked :-) )

On ISSUE I suggested

         item-value      =/      utf8-addr-spec


/ Kari Hurtta

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no> writes in gmane.ietf.ima:

> The following tickets are open on the EAI issue tracker:
> 
> 1483 SMTPEXT 2.7: Non-ASCII in response texts Text proposed in -06, no
> later discussion.
> 
> 1484 SMTPEXT 2.2: More exact definition of action choices Text
> proposed in -06, no later discussion.
> 
> 1485 UTF8HDR 4.6/DSN: Choice of body part for transport of UTF8SMTP messages
> MIME type message/something is proposed, no clear consensus. Poll will be
> sent.
> 
> 1486 SMTPEXT 2.7.2: Message retry Text proposed in -06, no later
> discussion.
> 
> 1487 UTF8HDR 4.2: Does this specification update MIME? Proposed
> resolution: Yes. Say so in introduction.
> 
> 1488 UTF8HDR 4.2: List MIME headers that are modified? Proposed
> resolution: Yes. We need an intro saying how we handle the
> difference in grammars.
> Propose to merge this with 1487.
> 
> 1490 UTF8HDR 4.2: Including Content-Description to picture (grammar)
> Propose to merge this with 1487.
> 
> 1491 UTF8HDR 4.2: Extending MIME (ABNF grammar) Propose to merge this
> with 1487.
> 
> 1492 SMTPEXT 2.7.3: <uFor> syntax Text proposed in -06, no later
> discussion.
> 
> 1493 SMTPEXT 2.4: Redefining of RCPT TO and MAIL FROM commands (ABNF
> grammar)
> Text proposed in -06, no later discussion.
> 
> 1494 UTF8HDR 4.4: <angle-addr> should include <obs-angle-addr>
> Proposed resolution: Yes; UTF-8 format needs to be an additional
> alternative (=/) on angle-addr.
> 
> 1495 SMTPEXT 2.5/2.6: Reply code used on DATA
> Text proposed in -06.
> 
> 1496 DOWNGRADE: Specify a simpler downgrade procedure?
> No discussion so far.
> 
> For the "text proposed in -06" tickets, we will interpret silence as "this
> is good enough", and resolve the tickets in a week or so. For the issues
> with no proposed solution, discussion is needed.
> 
>             harald, for the chairs



_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima