Re: message/utf-8-headers (was Re: [EAI] Poll for MIME type - revised schedule and details)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: message/utf-8-headers (was Re: [EAI] Poll for MIME type - revised schedule and details)



Dear colleagues,

On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 02:42:19PM +0100, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> It was always am oddity that text/rfc822-headers was used originally, but  
> now it is there noone can complain if the new DSNs use  
> text/utf8-headers/whatever. 

The above strikes me as a strange argument.  It suggests that, because
some wart was selected once in the past, all future warts are
automatically unobjectionable.  Surely that's not something we
believe, is it?

Best regards,
A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew at ca.afilias.info>                              M2P 2A8
jabber: ajsaf at jabber.org                 +1 416 646 3304 x4110


_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.