Re: message/utf-8-headers (was Re: [EAI] Poll for MIME type - revised schedule and details)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: message/utf-8-headers (was Re: [EAI] Poll for MIME type - revised schedule and details)
Dear colleagues,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 02:42:19PM +0100, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> It was always am oddity that text/rfc822-headers was used originally, but
> now it is there noone can complain if the new DSNs use
> text/utf8-headers/whatever.
The above strikes me as a strange argument. It suggests that, because
some wart was selected once in the past, all future warts are
automatically unobjectionable. Surely that's not something we
believe, is it?
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew at ca.afilias.info> M2P 2A8
jabber: ajsaf at jabber.org +1 416 646 3304 x4110
_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.