 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C Klensin wrote: >> Status report on core documents (hopefully "they have been >> approved" > One hopes, but that clearly depends on getting a revised version > of "utf8-headers" out and hoping it does not introduce any new > issues. I can't even guess on the others. RFC 5248 got its number. EAI DSN was approved with two comments: https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-eai-dsn/comment/83644/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-eai-dsn/comment/83634/ UTF8SMTP and the utf8-headers triggered a bunch of comments and DISCUSSions. It is not always obvious which draft is affected, but it is not only about utf8-headers: https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-eai-smtpext/ Frank _______________________________________________ IMA mailing list IMA at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima