Re: [EAI] Body parts
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EAI] Body parts





Frank Ellermann wrote:
Shawn Steele wrote:

a "you SHOULD do the obvious" norm does not really help, or does it ?
I think it does.  EAI requires that the client software understand
UTF-8 (otherwise From: and To: look stupid), so any application
must therefore be able to handle UTF-8 in the body as well.

That's what I doubted:  An EAI-aware MUA can of course handle UTF-8,
and hopefully the user of this MUA finds an e-mail service provider
with EAI-aware MSA / IMAP / POP3.  But this user might still have
friends with less capable MUAs and service providers, or use mailing
lists and newsgroups where UTF-8 is not yet the norm.

A technical SHOULD trying to modify netiquette would make me nervous.
Limited to "SHOULD be the default" it is acceptable, this could be
added to the eai-scenarios and/or eai-email-clients draft.

Section 4 in the eai-email-clients draft recommends UTF-8 as the default for new mail and the same character encoding as received mail for reply/forward. However since this document is informational only, recommendations are not as strong as SHOULD in a normative document.

Ernie

_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.