Re: [EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-pop-04.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-pop-04.txt



At 3:51 PM -0700 7/13/08, Bill McQuillan wrote:

 In the LANG examples, I noticed an oddity:

       < A LANG command with no arguments is a request for
       a language listing. >

       C: LANG
       S: +OK Language listing follows:
       S: en English
       S: en-boont English Boontling dialect
       S: de German
       S: it Italian
       S: i-default Default language
       S: .

 I would have expected 3rd and 4th response lines to be:

       S: de Deutsch
       S: it italiano

 This raises the issue of what language should the "human readable
 description of that language" be in.

 I could imagine:

 1 - the server's preferred language
 2 - the language itself
 3 - i-default
 4 - the current language

 Since the "human" most likely to read the "description" is the user trying
 to find a language s/he understands, I vote for #2.

 Also #4 might be combinatorily difficult.  ;-)

Hi Bill,

Good to see you still active in this stuff.

This is a good point, and one I'm inclined to agree with. The text already says that the language listing uses UTF-8.

--
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly-selected tag: ---------------
Perhaps the real reason why we have always been able to champion free
speech in this country is that we know perfectly well that hardly
anybody has got anything to say, and that no one will listen to anyone
that has.       -- Editorial, Daily Mail [British Paper, date unknown]
_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.