Re: [EAI] Proposed resolution of List-* and downgrade- Issues

["Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz at gmail.com>]

Martin Duerst wrote:

> My understanding is that this is enough for people to figure
> out that with EAI, they can use IRIs (encoded in UTF-8) in
> the Archived-At header(s) of EAI messages.

> If somebody thinks that's not enough, and a revision of RFC
> 5064 is needed, please tell me.

Not at this time, let's wait until the dust of IDNAbis and EAI
settles.  BCP 9 mumbles something about "six months", but IMO
an RFC 5064 promotion can wait until EAI, 2822upd, and IDNAbis
catch up.

 Frank

_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima