Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-pop-06
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-pop-06
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, SM wrote:
> The following comments are for draft-ietf-eai-pop-06.
>
> In Section 2:
>
> < Client requests depricated MUL language. Server replies
> with -ERR response >
>
> There is a typo for "depreciated".
I disagree: it should be "deprecated".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deprecate
(Business assets depreciate. Items in standards are deprecated by newer
standards.)
> In Appendix A:
>
> "Due to interoperability problems with RFC 2047 and limited deployment
> of RFC 2231, it is hoped these 7-bit encoding mechanisms can be
> deprecated in the future when UTF-8 header support becomes prevalent."
>
> There is a typo for "depreciated".
As suggested above, this text is correct and should not be changed.
Philip Guenther
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.