Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-pop-06
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-pop-06



On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, SM wrote:
> The following comments are for draft-ietf-eai-pop-06.
> 
> In Section 2:
> 
>   < Client requests depricated MUL language. Server replies
>       with -ERR response >
> 
> There is a typo for "depreciated".

I disagree: it should be "deprecated".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deprecate

(Business assets depreciate.  Items in standards are deprecated by newer 
standards.)


> In Appendix A:
> 
>   "Due to interoperability problems with RFC 2047 and limited deployment
>    of RFC 2231, it is hoped these 7-bit encoding mechanisms can be
>    deprecated in the future when UTF-8 header support becomes prevalent."
> 
> There is a typo for "depreciated".

As suggested above, this text is correct and should not be changed.


Philip Guenther

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.