Re: [EAI] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-07
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EAI] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-07



On 3-Sep-09, at 4:28 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:

[snip]


While not strictly a security consideration, it would be useful for
section 11 to point out the potential for user confusion caused by
SEARCH command match strings that have different UTF-8 representations
but display identically or similarly (strings that look like they
should match don't).

(*mumble*) This seems to me a job for RFC 3629, not this document. (And, BTW, it does so.)

Agreed with Pete, the security concerns are user name and password. SEARCH is more of usability than security. Maybe mention it in design rational instead? (Just suggesting, not saying it MUST or SHOULD)

Regards,
Joseph



** There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document

I'll find that.

== The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate

Huh? It's in there. Or is this document so old that it doesn't use the precise recommended wording? I'll leave that for the RFC Editor.

idnits 2.11.12 found a few things (I've deleted a couple of
obviously incorrect "Missing Reference:" warnings):

Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html: == Unused Reference: 'RFC2045' is defined on line 475, but no explicit
   reference was found in the text

Not sure if this one is needed or not.

Added a reference.

== Unused Reference: 'RFC2183' is defined on line 486, but no explicit
   reference was found in the text

I've entered an RFC Editor note that updates the document to reference this RFC.

Added.

** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 1341 (Obsoleted by RFC 1521)
According to authors this reference is intentional.

It is.

Thanks David (and Alexey).

pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.