Re: [EAI] The value of simplified downgrade

To: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [EAI] The value of simplified downgrade
From: SM <sm at resistor.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:23:02 -0700
Cc: ima at ietf.org
Delivered-to: ima at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1252614227; x=1252700627; bh=GosNutuBTkzo4DiJnzmrIZ+9YpLApaYItn3/5TvK8dU=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=c9L9uy57MDvOMWMimIWAF4h+jowKvweXTwt+1xTcZpBJdYGduqZDwa1vyqkykNu29 oEhj7LB6D0xetN9x4hkywmxjERMg/UkSrmBiDXXYkitDGDy8xXbnhBv2qi/kyFI1Ih me4XFTBQklOydVRD7uDUPmlEiY+X64hcyudD04gs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=zglC0VssQOCHMsBLyaFbFTL6uQxEGt433JrK+kbUjzYLIbn5p3sxto4+Fj2ZVIhq+ owt2LIc7HpyteazauNDEJpIrvMydXLu05av/3FAPPnTX58KRVYW+qcebb2Y8w59+aOs dgigQcqYVgt3W97Sph6693lXAocOVaB5uC4kVj8=
In-reply-to: <CAD7705D4A93814F97D3EF00790AF0B323DDCE56 at tk5ex14mbxc105.re dmond.corp.microsoft.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAD7705D4A93814F97D3EF00790AF0B323DDCE56 at tk5ex14mbxc105.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

At 11:16 10-09-2009, Shawn Steele wrote:

So you aren't suggesting an eai aware client should be able todowngradw w/o an eai aware server on it's side? That isunnecessarily restrictive.

No, my comment was about not having a MUA interact with the SMTPserver at the receiving end.


I'll comment further in my reply to Ernie's message.

Regards,

-sm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [EAI] The value of simplified downgrade
  - From: Shawn Steele

References:
- Re: [EAI] The value of simplified downgrade
  - From: Shawn Steele

Prev by Date: Re: [EAI] The value of simplified downgrade
Next by Date: Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-07
Previous by thread: Re: [EAI] The value of simplified downgrade
Next by thread: Re: [EAI] The value of simplified downgrade
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [EAI] The value of simplified downgrade

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.