Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-07
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-07
The document editor remains agnostic on these issues and waits for a
consensus call from the chair.
pr
On 9/20/09 at 5:09 PM -0400, Barry Leiba wrote:
My sense of the WG is that the WG doesn't feel that being creative
in how IMAP options are specified is something this WG wants.
Hm. I don't read that at all, from the few responses we have. That
said, I'm happy to accommodate:
I propose that we take my previous note, with all the changes
suggested in it, but we modify the way the capabilities are
specified.
Instead of "UTF8=x,y,z", we have "UTF8=x UTF8=y UTF8=z". In
particular, that means that there is no "UTF8" capability, and that
is instead called "UTF8=ACCEPT".
That should satisfy me, John, and Dave, as well as making Alexey and
Joseph feel better.
Is that cool?
Barry
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.