Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-07
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-07



The document editor remains agnostic on these issues and waits for a consensus call from the chair.

pr

On 9/20/09 at 5:09 PM -0400, Barry Leiba wrote:

My sense of the WG is that the WG doesn't feel that being creative in how IMAP options are specified is something this WG wants.

Hm. I don't read that at all, from the few responses we have. That said, I'm happy to accommodate: I propose that we take my previous note, with all the changes suggested in it, but we modify the way the capabilities are specified. Instead of "UTF8=x,y,z", we have "UTF8=x UTF8=y UTF8=z". In particular, that means that there is no "UTF8" capability, and that is instead called "UTF8=ACCEPT".

That should satisfy me, John, and Dave, as well as making Alexey and Joseph feel better.

Is that cool?

Barry


--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.