Internationalized eMail Address Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- Re: [EAI] message/global, was I-D Action, (continued)
- Re: [EAI] message/global, was I-D Action,
John R Levine
- Re: [EAI] message/global, was I-D Action,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] message/global, was I-D Action,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] message/global, was I-D Action,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: [EAI] message/global, was I-D Action,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] message/global, was I-D Action,
John Levine
- Re: [EAI] message/global, was I-D Action,
Tony Hansen
- Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-08.txt,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-08.txt,
Dave CROCKER
- [EAI] POLL RESULT: Is the new text in Introduction section in RFC5335bis good to replace the original?,
Joseph Yee
- [EAI] POLL RESULT: Is the new text in Abstract section in RFC5335bis good to replace the original?,
Joseph Yee
- [EAI] POLL RESULT: Is the new text good to insert as subsection (1.1) under the Introduction section, replacing section 1.2 under version 07 and section 1.1 under version 08 of RFC5335bis,
Joseph Yee
- [EAI] Meeting in Prague,
Joseph Yee
- Re: [EAI] #10 - new text to insert as subsection (1.x) under section Introduction,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] #9 new text in Introduction of 5335bis,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] #8 New text in Abstract,
Shawn Steele
- [EAI] POLL: Is the new text good to insert as subsection (1.1) under the Introduction section, replacing section 1.2 under version 07 and section 1.1 under version 08 of RFC5335bis,
Joseph Yee
- [EAI] POLL: Is the new text in Introduction section in RFC5335bis good to replace the original?,
Joseph Yee
- [EAI] POLL: Is the new text in Abstract section in RFC5335bis good to replace the original?,
Joseph Yee
- [EAI] [eai] rfc5335bis #10 (new): POLL: new text to insert as subsection (1.x) under section Introduction,
eai issue tracker
- [EAI] [eai] rfc5335bis #9 (new): POLL: new text in Introduction in RFC5335bis to replace the original,
eai issue tracker
- [EAI] [eai] rfc5335bis #8 (new): POLL: new text in Abstract section in RFC5335bis to replace the original,
eai issue tracker
- [EAI] RFC5335bis review and poll,
Joseph Yee
- Re: [EAI] [eai] rfc5336bis #5 (closed): consensus question: keep nested encodings for message/global?,
eai issue tracker
- Re: [EAI] [eai] rfc5336bis #3 (closed): consensus question: remove repetition of normative text?,
eai issue tracker
- [EAI] EAI session request for Prague meeting,
Joseph Yee
- [EAI] consensus text and parameter of MAIL FROM,
Joseph Yee
- Re: [EAI] is it time for chairs to give a conclusion for Issue #1 ?,
Troy Starr
- [EAI] is it time for chairs to give a conclusion for Issue #1 ?,
Jiankang YAO
- [EAI] OOF for a 10 days,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] IMA Digest, Vol 67, Issue 3,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] Getting done quick,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] Should/may,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAI LFROM,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] Parameter(s) on MAIL options,
John Levine
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
John Levine
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Dave CROCKER
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Dave CROCKER
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Dave CROCKER
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
John Levine
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Dave CROCKER
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Bill McQuillan
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Dave CROCKER
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Dave CROCKER
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Troy Starr
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Charles Lindsey
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #4 - new reference and term,
Shawn Steele
- [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #4 - new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"?,
Joseph Yee
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #2 - new parameter to VRFY/EXPNonly after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?,
Jiankang YAO
- [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM,
Joseph Yee
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #1 - Parameter on MAIL FROM,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #3 - remove repetition of normative text?,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #5 - Keep nested encodings for message/global?,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #2 - new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #6 - Current metalanguage model acceptable? And Dave Crocker's proposal,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #7 - change definition of uAtom?,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] The -08 draft,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-08.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] Why the transition will be pretty fast in some places.,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] Proposal for Alternate ABNF (was: Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?),
Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #???: Media types that support multiple charsets SHOULD employ utf-8,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] parameter on MAIL FROM,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] Consensus Issue #6: current metalanguage model acceptable?,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #5: keep nested encodings for message/global?,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #7: change definition of uAtom?,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #4: new reference and term for "ASCII", "non-ASCII", "UTF-8"?,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #3: remove repetition of normative text?,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #2: new parameter to VRFY/EXPN only after EHLO with UTF8SMTPbis?,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Joseph Yee
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Troy Starr
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
fujiwara
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Bill McQuillan
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Dave CROCKER
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Dave CROCKER
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John Levine
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John C Klensin
- Message not available
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Bill McQuillan
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John C Klensin
- Message not available
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Bill McQuillan
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Bill McQuillan
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John R Levine
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John Levine
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John R Levine
- Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Troy Starr
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Consensus Issue #1: parameter on MAIL FROM?,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] return A-label?,
Jiankang YAO
[EAI] consensus questions,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] RFC publication numbers and titles,
Ernie Dainow
[EAI] UTF8REPLY,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] syntax: uAtom,
Jiankang YAO
- Message not available
- Message not available
[EAI] utf8 reply in RCPT Commands,
Jiankang YAO
[EAI] determining the question set for consensus call,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] MAY transmit mailbox names,
Jiankang YAO
[EAI] Consensus-determining procedures,
John C Klensin
Re: [EAI] Repeating normative text from other specifications,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] Random thought on ASCII range,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] non-EAI messages,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Parameter on MAIL command,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] ascii nomenclature,
Shawn Steele
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
Shawn Steele
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
John Levine
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
John R Levine
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
ned+ima
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
John R Levine
- Re: [EAI] EAI review topic: VRFY/EXPN,
Yangwoo Ko
[EAI] EAI review topic: Parameter on MAIL command,
John C Klensin
[EAI] WG status, next steps, and the long "review" note,
John C Klensin
[EAI] UTF-8 in a Subject header field?,
Dave CROCKER
Re: [EAI] draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] (private) draft review of: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt (v3),
Dave CROCKER
[EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis,
Claudio Allocchio
Re: [EAI] apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis,
Ned Freed
[EAI] Analysis of comments on 5336bis (was: Re: apps-team review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis),
John C Klensin
- [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Dave CROCKER
- Message not available
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Yangwoo Ko
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Dave CROCKER
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Yangwoo Ko
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Joseph Yee
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Yangwoo Ko
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Joseph Yee
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Dave CROCKER
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Yangwoo Ko
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
John C Klensin
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Charles Lindsey
- Message not available
- Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Barry Leiba
Re: [EAI] Unicode vs. UTF-8 / Encoding vs. Representation,
Dave CROCKER
[EAI] Repeating normative text from other specifications,
Dave CROCKER
Message not available
[EAI] Co-chair's comments on state of the documents and the WG,
John C Klensin
[EAI] [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-eai-rfc5337bis-dsn-01.txt,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] Fw: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-eai-rfc5337bis-dsn-01.txt,
Jiankang YAO
[EAI] FW:Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5337bis-dsn-1,
Jiankang YAO
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-07.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[EAI] Fw: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5337bis-dsn-1,
Jiankang YAO
[EAI] review of rfc5335bis-06,
Joseph Yee
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[EAI] review of rfc5335bis-05.txt,
YAO Jiankang
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-07.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[EAI] My happiness with current drafts.,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] 5336bis,
Shawn Steele
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-05.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[EAI] Comments on the latest ABNF in draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-04.txt,
Alexey Melnikov
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-05.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[EAI] WG Co-chair review of 5335bis (headers extension),
John C Klensin
[EAI] WG Co-chair review of 5336bis (SMTP extension),
John C Klensin
[EAI] mailbox in rfc5321 and 5322 VS mailbox in rfc5335bis and 5336bis,
Jiankang YAO
- Message not available
- Message not available
[EAI] AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-03 .txt,
Alexey Melnikov
[EAI] WITH protocol types Re: AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt,
Jiankang YAO
Mail converted by MHonArc
