Re: [INDEP] Re: Last call on draft-klensin-independent...

[Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>]

  *> My concern in part derives from recent Independent Submissions which, 
  *> while specified as Informational Status, modify Standards Track 
  *> documents, or request the allocation of IANA parameters reserved for 
  *> Standards Action or IETF Consensus.  This does not appear to be precluded 
  *> by this document, yet if allowed to proceed would circumvent RFC 2026. 
  *> 
  *> > 

I hear with your concerns.  Let's try to talk about specific examples.
The IANA parameters are clearly wrong.  Now, an Independent Submission
should be able to DISCUSS or SUGGEST a POSSIBLE change in a standards
track protocol, I believe; it should not go beyond that, and it should
be clear.  Do you think we have violated this?

Bob Braden


_______________________________________________
INDEPENDENT mailing list
INDEPENDENT at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/independent