Re: [INDEP] Re: comments on draft-klensin-independent-05.txt

[Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>]

  *> 
  *> One additional tuning suggestion.   If we are going to move
  *> toward posting a notice that a document has gone into RFC Editor
  *> review as an independent submission somewhere, I think we should
  *> allow the IESG to notify the RFC Editor that _they_ are
  *> initiating that review as well.  If they never take advantage of
  *> it, nothing is lost.  But, again in the interest of efficiency
  *> and flexibility, if an AD happens to notice a document headed
  *> down the "independent" path that seems problematic, in the
  *> spirit of this exchange I don't see any reason to prevent the
  *> IESG from initiating the review if they think that is
  *> appropriate.
  *> 
  *>      john
  *> 

Not unreasonable, although the program begins to get rather obscure
with locks and signals! ;-)

The information that a given draft is in RFC Editor review as an
independent submission is of course always available in the RFC
Editor quueue, but I suppose there could be a display that shows
the time derivative of the queue.

Boib


_______________________________________________
INDEPENDENT mailing list
INDEPENDENT at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/independent