Re: [Int-area] updated to draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered-03
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Int-area] updated to draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered-03



On 10/1/07, Danny McPherson <danny at tcb.net> wrote:

On Oct 1, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Joe Touch wrote:

> MUST is the directive to implementers of this specification, and is
> appropriate (I didn't check, but presumably it is paired with "MUST be
> ignored on receipt").

I did look for that, didn't recall seeing it (or any other error
handling, etc.., for that matter).

I've added that.  What other error handling do you think might be useful
to define?

Alia


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.