[Int-area] support for draft-manner-router-alert-iana-02

To: "int-area at ietf.org" <int-area at ietf.org>
Subject: [Int-area] support for draft-manner-router-alert-iana-02
From: "Georgios Karagiannis" <karagian at cs.utwente.nl>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:53:00 +0000
Bounce-to: "Georgios Karagiannis" <karagian at cs.utwente.nl>
Delivered-to: ietfarch-int-area-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: int-area at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/int-area>
List-help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: int-area-bounces at ietf.org

Hi all

I would like to emphasize that I have read the
draft-manner-router-alert-iana-02.txt and i found it very useful on
solving the mismatch between IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert option value
field allocation in the IANA registry.

Therefore, I support the action of making this draft an RFC with status:
standards track.


Best regards,
Georgios
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Prev by Date: [Int-area] Comments on draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-02
Next by Date: Re: [Int-area] Comments on draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-02
Previous by thread: [Int-area] Using IKE to negotiate IPsec Protected GRE key based tunnel
Next by thread: [Int-area] more feedback on draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-02
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Int-area] support for draft-manner-router-alert-iana-02

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.