[Int-area] practical issues with using v4-mapped addresses for nat64
marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Mon, 21 July 2008 11:00 UTC
Return-Path: <int-area-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-area-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-int-area-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AE83A6981; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F983A695C for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.308, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_BAD_ID=2.837, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3gpm6ZP+1AXK for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (smtp03.uc3m.es [163.117.176.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A4D3A6975 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dummyhost25.it.uc3m.es (unknown [163.117.139.225])by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EF349074D;Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:00:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <48846C5B.2050602@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:00:43 +0200
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: int-area@ietf.org
X-imss-version: 2.051
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scanInfo: M:B L:E SM:2
X-imss-tmaseResult: TT:1 TS:-11.0075 TC:1F TRN:63 TV:5.5.1026(16044.006)
X-imss-scores: Clean:100.00000 C:0 M:0 S:0 R:0
X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.0000 0.0000)
Cc: Philip Matthews <philip_matthews@magma.ca>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-mapped addresses for nat64
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: int-area-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: int-area-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, (discussing this in int area rather than behave following the guidelines of the ADs) Dave suggested that we could use v4-mapped addresses to represent v4 addresses in v6 land, when using the nat64. This has the advantage that dual stack nodes will automatically prefer native v6 connectivity cause the rfc3484 default policy table implies that. (the main argument is that if we use a different prefix, dual stack hosts will need to implement some way to determine which is translated connectivity vs translated connectivity, so legacy hosts, will not be able to distinguish that and may end up using translated connectivity and the apps that don't work through nat would fail) We have been doing some tests about how current OSes work with v4-mapped addresses and the results are not very encouraging. We (well, mostly Iljitsch actually) have made the following simple trial scenario. We have a IPv6 server and we have created the following RR: All under runningipv6.net: test1 IN AAAA ::ffff:83.149.65.1 test2 IN AAAA ::ffff:83.149.65.1 IN AAAA 2001:1af8:2:5::2 note that ::ffff:83.149.65.1 is unreachable in IPv6, but 83.149.65.1 is reachable in IPv4. So, when we have a dual stack machine as a source, the following happens when we try to go to these FQDNs using Safari on Mac or IE on Vista (we captured the packets to determine which IP version was used): Both Windows vista and MacOS Leopard Dual stack connecting to test1: it works so it sends IPv4 packets... this seems reasonable, but i wonder if it is always ok. Both Windows vista and MacOS leopard Dual stack sending to test2: it works and it they both send IPv6 packets, (this is what we want!) When we have a source machine that is v6-only (i.e. the v4 stack is disabled), the following happens: MacOs Leopard v6-only stack sending to test1: doesn't send any packets Windows vista sending packets to test1: doesn't send any packet MacOs Leopard v6-only sending packets to test2: stalled and then works using v6 packets, so it seemed it has preferred first the mapped address and then fall back to the real v6 Windows vista sending packets to test2: it works, so it preferring the real v6 address right away So, the conclusion from this is that we have a problem with v6 only hosts, since they seem to assume that v4-mapped are not usable when the v4 stack is down, even when they get this address in a dns AAAA RR. So according to this, using the v4-mapped address would imply that v6 only nodes would not work and would need updating. If this is the case, then i think we are better of with the other failure mode i.e. dual stack nodes sometimes preferring translated connectivity i think, cause seems a less severe failure and can be avoided by not exposing synthetic AAAA RR to dual stack hosts (which can be done by having no DNS64 functionality in the NDS server that is serving the dual stack hosts) (the other possibility is that we got our tests wrong :-) We did this in a minute, so it may well be wrong. So this needs host updates in the most popular OSes. Alternatively, we could depend on the fact that A records result in v4-mapped addresses in the stack anyway and forego the DNS64 step, but in that case changes are also necessary because the resolver only provides v4-mapped addresses to applications when there is IPv4 reachability. We have left the RR in the server, in case anyone else want to try them and share the results. We have additional RR so you can have more fun All under runningipv6.net: test1 IN AAAA ::ffff:83.149.65.1 test2 IN AAAA ::ffff:83.149.65.1 IN AAAA 2001:1af8:2:5::2 test3 IN AAAA ::ffff:83.149.65.1 IN A 83.149.65.1 test4 IN AAAA ::ffff:83.149.65.1 IN AAAA 2001:1af8:2:5::2 IN A 83.149.65.1 Regards, Iljitsch and marcelo _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
- [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-mapped … marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Dave Thaler
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Dave Thaler
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Dave Thaler
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Dave Thaler
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Dave Thaler
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Shin Miyakawa
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Julien Laganier
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Dave Thaler
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-map… Iljitsch van Beijnum