Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-mapped addresses for nat64

[Dave Thaler <dthaler at windows.microsoft.com>]

No IPv4 addresses to hand out == IPv6-only network
(for purposes of this discussion anyway)

-Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: int-area-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:int-area-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Ted Lemon
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:29 PM
> To: int-area at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-mapped addresses
> for nat64
>
> On Jul 22, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Dave Thaler wrote:
> > If you have a dual-IP-version
> > network and a host OS that supports both IPv4 and IPv6, why would
> > anyone disable IPv4 on the host?  That doesn't seem like a very
> > important case to me.
>
> Perhaps because you don't have any IPv4 addresses to hand out, and
> don't want to run a multilevel NAT infrastructure?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area