![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Marcelo, Dave,
I think it is a requirement that if you have a v6-only network, you must be able to take your (current) dual-stack host into this network and not have breakage.I would argue that a dual-stack OS with IPv4 disabled is not a commonscenario.why not? I thought this was one of the primary scenarios..I mean, i though we were targetting for the case when there are no more v4 addresses and people deploy v6 networksI mean, if we have dual stack and we have v4 connectivity, we don't need natpt, since we can reach the v4 network using ipv4... i must be missing something very obvious here, could you explain?
Jari _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area