 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> I am sorry but I do not buy that at all. We have implementations that behave > this way and we now need to somehow pretend for your academic reasons that they > do not exist? Is the question under discussion whether to document what has already been implemented? If so, then discussion of the merits/demerits is indeed academic -- but so is discussion of adoption of the document as an IETF WG work item. Just put the documentation on a web site, or send it to the RFC Editor for publication as an Independent Submission. Or is the question whether the document is an appropriate basis for future work? If so, then discussion of merits/demerits is not at all academic -- it is a core issue. |
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area