Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea

To: Shin Miyakawa <miyakawa at nttv6.jp>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:34:17 +1200
Cc: int-area at ietf.org
Delivered-to: ietfarch-int-area-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: int-area at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Wi/QB/uU/K7ecZmCaJN+JcOZDsuqUIfsjUhctvPyKA=; b=bjikclKYl40f6luWjQauqqnQcpoYB1bVHq4NiQstLemVnwKdhM5JidTDua/B+UPiVc 5F7wKpEAyFLyxawBjEyvWI4gqd+jIEUh+afMruX2yO/oewm4AhHKc48r5gadFhFIGLth plgH65qndHmasiieE5D9EZ0zkE2a7q8z/KTbA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=dY7tmuBdXY8owJNS9CIPFaSQYb6WIRt0gP/yM8qZIhBJl1R1DpVJ9MCyET4W7l07+e ZINeFrpzEW0l4wTCGG2xJbk8w/RyxkHEgfZ+RCKKflO7qSgpcduSH6UaHFK2Ihut6yRg Ltl+Jm87LegY871hxJd0cUTlx/kUPXWoWzH2k=
In-reply-to: <20080731.230554.104088185.miyakawa@nttv6.jp>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/int-area>
List-help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: University of Auckland
References: <4891B31D.3030003@piuha.net> <4891C22D.4010807@gmail.com> <20080731.230554.104088185.miyakawa@nttv6.jp>
Sender: int-area-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

On 2008-08-01 02:05, Shin Miyakawa wrote:
> From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
>> I don't understand why a customer using Net 10 can't be NATted (at the CPE)
>> into an ISP using Net 10. 
> 
> Because today's CPE can not do this.

Really? I don't quite understand how anyone could design a NAT
with that restriction. Can you explain this?

I also understood that in some countries, ISPs were already
forced to use nested NATs, so what address space do they use?

   Brian
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
  - From: Shin Miyakawa

References:
- [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
  - From: Shin Miyakawa

Prev by Date: [Int-area] Further additions to -thaler-ip-model-evolution
Next by Date: Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
Previous by thread: Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
Next by thread: Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.