Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:34:17 +1200
> >> I don't understand why a customer using Net 10 can't be NATted (at the CPE)
> >> into an ISP using Net 10.
> >
> > Because today's CPE can not do this.
>
> Really? I don't quite understand how anyone could design a NAT
> with that restriction. Can you explain this?
Because, often a CPE is a router with NAT function with single routing table.
>
> I also understood that in some countries, ISPs were already
> forced to use nested NATs, so what address space do they use?
As talked in the meeting, in this case, they just simpley restrict
cusutomers not to use 10.0.0.0/8 in cutomer premises.
But as just it is told in the meeting, sometime small
companies and/or brach offices run 10.0.0.0/8 in the LAN.
Regards,
Shin Miyakawa
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.