Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Int-area] discussion of the ISP shared address idea



Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I don't understand why a customer using Net 10 can't be NATted (at the CPE)
> into an ISP using Net 10. Since NATs completely separate two address
> realms, I can't see any reason this would work any differently than
> by inventing Net10bis.

  The same thing happens when companies buy other companies.  The worst
I've seen (so far) is 3 layers of NAT, all using Net 10.  It works, and
it plays hob with equipment trying to have "internal" IP addresses.  But
hacking selected server equipment is usually cheaper than changing
hundreds of switches and thousands of end hosts.

  Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.