Re: [Int-area] intarea charter
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Int-area] intarea charter



Jari,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko at piuha.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:35 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Internet Area
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] intarea charter
> 
> On the date: there is no penalty for finishing early. Or I could put in
> a more reasonable date if you have a suggestion.

Suggesting a date would be beyond the scope of my
understanding of process, so I will refrain from
making any suggestions.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin at boeing.com

> On the document class: Admittedly I put Exp in a hurry and I knew this
> might not be right. Ralph has an ongoing question to the group about
> adopting the document as a work item, and doing some serious reviews on
> it. I think we need to get the input from the group on the right class.
> My own opinion is that experimental is not quite right because it would
> be repeating the same status as you already have on the RFC Editor
> submission. Then again, I'm not quite sure this it can be standards
> track either.
>
> Jari

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.