Re: [Int-area] intarea charter

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>]

Marcelo,

> In some WGs, the chairs require a number (5 for instance) of thorough 
> reviews from non-authors to accept a WG document, which should reflect 
> that at least 5 people care about this in a serious way. Of course, in 
> a normal WG, there si already consensus that the work is needed cause 
> that was part of the charter discussion, so since in this case, and 
> the 5 reviews are needed to verify the quality of the document. In 
> this case, since the charter is opne, you would have both questiosn 
> raised at the same time i.e. whehter we care about the topic and 
> whehter the particular document is the right one, so probably the bar 
> should be even higher.

Right, this is a good formulation of the problem. I'll see if I can 
wordsmith something to the charter about this.

Jari