Re: [Int-area] intarea charter
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Int-area] intarea charter



About the SEAL, we have talked about it in the INT area
meetings on three separate occasions since IETF71, and the
document has matured significantly since that time. About
a date to advance the document, I believe it can be ready
to go much earlier than was listed in the draft wg charter;
let's say March 2010. About document category, I favor PS
but am willing to discuss other categories.

BTW, I am +1 for formation of the wg.

Fred
fred.l.templin at boeing.com  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: int-area-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:int-area-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Margaret Wasserman
> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 7:23 AM
> To: Jari Arkko
> Cc: Internet Area
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] intarea charter
> 
> 
> On Oct 1, 2009, at 12:59 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> >
> > In any case, we will make sure that there is an agreement to work on
> > every item in the list, either in the form of an earlier informal
> > decision (IPID, tunnel, unnumbered) or a new decision (SEAL). Does
> > that
> > satisfy your concern?
> 
> Yes, definitely.
> 
> I agree that this consensus should be pretty easy to establish in the
> case of documents that we've already been successfully developing in
> the less formal group.
> 
> Margaret
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.