Re: [Int-area] intarea charter

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>]

Margaret, Scott,

> The responsible AD(s) can approve changes to WG milestones without the 
> need to recharter.  So, as long as we don't provide a list of work 
> items in the charter text, adding new work items to the milestone list 
> will not require re-chartering.  I think we should add a milestone (or 
> a set of milestones) for each new work item, after we have accepted 
> the work item as a working group document, so that it is clear what we 
> are working on and when we expect it to complete.

Yes.

> I am not entirely sure what the line "Significant new work items will 
> be brought for approval to the IESG" means.  I think that should 
> either be better explained or removed.  The TSVWG has the following 
> wording, which I prefer:
>
> Additional work [...] in TSVWG must satisfy four
> conditions: (1) WG consensus on the suitability and projected quality
> of the proposed work item. (2) A core group of WG participants with
> sufficient energy and expertise to advance the work item according to
> the proposed schedule. (3) Commitment from the WG as a whole to
> provide sufficient and timely review of the proposed work item. (4)
> Agreement by the ADs, who, depending on the scope of the proposed
> work item, may decide that an IESG review is needed first.

This would be much better. Thanks.

Jari