Re: [Int-area] intarea charter

[Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya at yahoo.com>]

+1

Regards,

Behcet



----- Original Message ----
> From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan at ericsson.com>
> To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>
> Cc: Internet Area <int-area at ietf.org>
> Sent: Mon, October 12, 2009 10:28:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] intarea charter
> 
> Hi Jari,
> 
> On 09-10-12 11:18 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> > The second possibility is to create two groups, a discussion forum and a 
> document development group. The benefit of this approach is that the two roles 
> are clearly separated and similar to what has been done on other areas. Two sets 
> of chairs would be needed, and at least the ones for the document part would not 
> be the ADs. A potential downside is that if we create a new group in a place 
> where we traditionally have not had that much work, we might open an avenue for 
> publishing unnecessary documents, documents that were rejected by existing 
> working groups or BOFs, etc. 
> 
> I support this option. The intarea meeting could be a gatekeeper for the intwg 
> to keep such (useless, rejected) documents out. i.e. Charter items for the intwg 
> need to have been discussed in intarea and found sufficient support prior to 
> inclusion.
> 
> Cheers
> Suresh
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area