Re: [Int-area] Adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis as WG draft

[<mohamed.boucadair at orange.com>]

Dear Scott,

No problem to add a reference to RFC6462. FWIW, I removed it because it was not mentioned in the text proposed by A. Cooper.

Cheers,
Med 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : int-area-bounces at ietf.org 
> [mailto:int-area-bounces at ietf.org] De la part de Scott Brim
> Envoyé : vendredi 10 février 2012 15:46
> À : Suresh Krishnan
> Cc : Internet Area
> Objet : Re: [Int-area] Adoption of 
> draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis as WG draft
> 
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 09:33, Suresh Krishnan
> <suresh.krishnan at ericsson.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >  There was significant support to adopt this draft as wg 
> item both in
> > the face-to-face meeting in Taipei and on the mailing list. 
> There were
> > some significant privacy concerns raised concerning the 
> draft, and they
> > needed to be addressed. Alissa performed a review and had 
> proposed some
> > text additions and changes to the draft to make it more specific and
> > useful. These changes have been made, and we feel that the draft is
> > ready to be taken up as a wg item.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Suresh & Julien
> 
> It looks like the privacy workshop reference was removed?
> 
> Since there is still a lot of misunderstanding about privacy in the
> IETF, and since the text on privacy does not include much explanation,
> there should be at least one reference so that implementors can
> understand the point.
> 
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>