RE: [ipcdn] AD (MIB Dcotor) review of: draft-ietf-ipcdn-bpiplus-mib-11.txt

["Jean-Francois Mule" <jf.mule@cablelabs.com>]

Eduardo wrote:
> Please suggest any changes you would like
> 
> Proposed text:
> 
> 
> 2.2 Relationship between BPI+ and BPI MIBs
> This section describes the relationship between the BPI+ MIB 
> module defined in this document and the BPI MIB module 
> defined in RFC 3083 [RFC3083]. The BPI+ protocol interface is 
> an enhancement to the BPI protocol and it is a distinct 
> protocol from BPI. The associated BPI+ managed objects should 
> be considered separate from the BPI MIB objects defined in RFC 3083.
> 
> DOCSIS 1.1 and 2.0 systems implement both BPI+ and BPI 
> protocols to be backward compatible with 1.0 systems. For 
> more information regarding the interoperability between BPI 
> and BPI+ systems, refer to appendix C of [1] and for MIB 
> modules requirements, refers to section 4.6.1, Figure 9 of 
> [3] and 7.6.1, Table 7-9  of [4]

Looks good to me.
Jean-François

_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
IPCDN@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn